Thoughts on what age dating should start?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Elzee
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
E

Elzee

Guest
Several of us were talking about this the other day and I thought it would be interesting to open this discussion up on this forum. I know it depends on many factors, but what are your thoughts on determining at what age a teen is ready to start dating - - going as a couple in groups, going out alone as a couple, etc. What restrictions should apply? It seems this starts so early anymore. I see girls and boys as young as 12 and 13 holding hands, hugging, calling each other boyfriend/girlfriend.
 
My parents rule was that 16 is the earliest age to start dating. I think anything before that is awful young. If anything is happening at that age, it should be in a group. In fact, I sometimes wonder if 16 is too young. Some people don’t really start to mature until they are out of school and on their own. At least that’s what it seems like. Once someone knows what it’s like “out there,” then they start to lose the “game time” mentality. Then there are those who never grow up. It just depends on the actual maturity of the person.
 
I expect I’ll be alone or in the definite minority on this, but our view has been that dating shouldn’t occur until one is ready to begin contemplating marriage. The temptation to sexual sin will be greatly reduced by not going out alone with members of the opposite sex. Group dates, where it’s understood that no one is going to be leaving the main group to isolate themselves … and where the group is doing something fun and wholesome: amusement park, eating out, movies, bowling can be fine. But one on one dating at 16-17-18…there’s no reason for it. No mainstream Catholic is going to be for early marriage, so why favor throwing your kids into temptation years and years before they can even consider getting married? The statistics on even “good Catholic kids” entering college and ending up in sexual relationships is about 80% … throw in contraception, STD’s and abortions … I don’t think we can assume our kids are stronger than we were.🤷
 
I’m the mom of two grown daughters, and I still do a lot of (volunteer) work with children and teenagers.

I would say that once a girl has started her period, it is very difficult to keep her from getting interested in boys. You can try, but God made females to develop an interest in the opposite sex once they are fertile, and I believe your efforts to keep her a little girl will fail and create much conflict and unhappiness in your family.

So I think that it is better to encourage, yes, encourage, interest in boys, but to guide your daughters so that they learn how to be friends with boys, who, up until the hormones kicked in, were “icky” to most girls!

Keep in mind that there is nothing evil happening when a girl is interested in a boy. That’s normal. Even if the girl is young, if she is fertile, it’s still normal. God made her to want children–that’s a good thing. So don’t try to give your daughters the impression that they are doing anything wrong. Just guide them.

IMO, a girl should be allowed to go out with mixed groups (boys and girls) starting around age 10, if she has enough friends (boys and girls) who are interested in going out together. Obviously these groups will be driven to their destination by their parents, and I don’t have a problem with parents chaperoning the activities–in fact, I think a chaperone hovering somewhere in the distance, but within shouting distance, is a good idea.

I’m thinking of the following activities for these mixed groups:

A movie (rated G; e.g., a Pixar animation film, or a Disney cartoon movie)–this should definitely be chaperoned, but Mom or Dad should sit away from the group of kids.

A sports event, especially a school event at their own school, but also a city team (E.g., going to see a Bears game).

A concert or play/musical. The play or musical should be something fairly “G-rated.” I know that plays and musicals don’t have ratings, but use common sense and the internet to research the plays/musicals. E.g., “Spring Awakenings” would be a big “NO!” for younger teens and pre-teens. “Fiddler on the Roof” would be a “yes.” “Putnam County Spelling Bee” would be a “Maybe,” but I’m guessing that the boys would be so embarrassed by it that they would beg their parents to please move away from their city to a new home across the country, so I wouldn’t allow it for a young mixed group.

A service project; e.g., serving in the rescue mission soup kitchen, or picking up trash in a city park or at the school.

A church service or Mass.

A family get-together, if there is enough room to accommodate the group of friends.

A meal at a family-style restaurant (e.g., Culvers) that does NOT serve alcohol. I’m certain that no decent restaurant would sell alcohol to a group of young teens, but it’s just the atmosphere. Why take a chance?

Now–as for dating–I would say two couples can go out together by around age 13-14, and to the same type of events as above, and again, they will be driven to their destination by their parents. I don’t think chaperones are necessary at this age.

I would say dating with just a boy and girl could happen as early as 13. Certainly by age 16.

You might think that 13 is too early, but I don’t agree. I think that it’s good when “children” start working on their relationship young. They “grow up together,” and form their values and opinions and worldview.

But most importantly, when the dating couple is young, they are still very much under the authority of their parents, and so there is someone outside of themselves to control their relationship. Because they don’t drive, they have no choice but to rely on their parents, and this means that they have to demonstrate respect for parents who are quite capable of locking up the car and saying, “No, you will stay home tonight.”

Once your kids are 16 or older, you’ve lost them. Even if they are close and you love each other, realistically, you no longer have much control over them. They can drive and work, and often teens of this age figure out how to work and earn enough money to buy their own car and insurance and then they can drive.

I think that by age 16, the "child’ is no longer a child, and should have all the adult skills necessary to survive and thrive in the United States. So IMO, it’s useless to try to deal with them as “children” and forbid any dating. You’re bucking all of God’s creation to do this. GOD created children to grow up and become parents themselves. The best you can do is guide, and if you have done a good job of guiding while the child is growing up, you will still have some influence once the child IS grown up.

That’s my opinion. Hope it’s helpful to some and harmful to none.
 
I was never given an age limit on when I was allowed to start dating boys.
I remember becoming very interested in them (beyond innocent crushes) at the age of 13. I didn’t actually start dating until I was almost 18.

I have a daughter now…and I know this is going to be a hot topic of discussion when the time comes (hubby seems to think 25 is an appropriate age…:rolleyes:)

Personally, I don’t think a young couple is mature enough for independent dating until they are 17 or 18.
I think group dates can be fine for teens as young as 15…as long as they are responsible and they are picked up and dropped off by a parent.

Clearly this is up to the discretion of the parents and the teenager…if the teenager demonstrates a level of responsibility and confidence of one’s self (in matters of faith, sexuality and intention) that has been discussed at length with the parent’s…then I can’t see the harm of dating at said age.

I’m somewhat torn on the issue though…because I absolutely agree that dating is meant to discern marriage and I can’t imagine two 15 year olds discerning something of this magnitude.
 
Definitely not before the age of 17!

After all, the next step, beyond dating, in all likelihood is sex, and there is no way people who are not legally adults should even step up to that.

ICXC NIKA
 
I expect I’ll be alone or in the definite minority on this, but our view has been that dating shouldn’t occur until one is ready to begin contemplating marriage. The temptation to sexual sin will be greatly reduced by not going out alone with members of the opposite sex. Group dates, where it’s understood that no one is going to be leaving the main group to isolate themselves … and where the group is doing something fun and wholesome: amusement park, eating out, movies, bowling can be fine. But one on one dating at 16-17-18…there’s no reason for it. No mainstream Catholic is going to be for early marriage, so why favor throwing your kids into temptation years and years before they can even consider getting married? The statistics on even “good Catholic kids” entering college and ending up in sexual relationships is about 80% … throw in contraception, STD’s and abortions … I don’t think we can assume our kids are stronger than we were.🤷
Well if it helps I’m in the minority with you. The issue I see is with indoctrinating kids into believing multiple short term romantic attachments are good/normal. I have both an 18 year old daughter and 15 year old son. My daughter is allow to date assuming she is looking to get married. Since she openly says shes not ready to marry then why “test the waters”?
 
I would say late teens, 18 to early twenties is the best time to start dating. I am almost 19 and I don’t think I am ready. I think it’s much better for a group of friends, boys and girls, to go out and just enjoy their time. I think it’s better to practice self discipline and prepare oneself to be the “right” person before they start considering dating and even marriage 🙂

-This is coming from a soon to be 19 year old 😛
 
Come on Catholics, what are you thinking. Please consider this. “Dating” is commonly understood in our present-day society as a girl-boy romantic relationship WHICH HAS ABSOULTE NO INTENTION to progress to marriage.
As such, a good definition would be “guaranteed-heartbreak relationship”.
Why do we insist in putting our children thru that ? Do you really think it is appropriate to place children in a situation that would naturally lead to them becoming parents at the age of 12 -17 ???

In times before these, young people did not “date”, in such a whimsical fashion, they COURTED. Courtship was (usually) begun with the parents’ blessing & approval, and if all went well between the young people, the expected outcome was marriage.

I know this is a real stretch from the way things are today, but to hear RC’s talk about sending their kids on dates at 13 years old ( and SEEING too many cases of the disaster it can bring ), just makes me wonder. Seems too many parents want their kids to grow up WAY to fast.

JP-II’s “Theology of the Body” should be required reading for all young people, AND their parents.

I see that GEddie, Usige, and Rafarose understand what i am saying, thank goodness there are some who get it. I wish all parents and teens did !
 
I have always had more guy friends than girls. So I have always hungout in groups with boys. Boys were never a taboo thing. 🤷 I wasn’t allowed to have a one on one date until I was 16. My first real boyfriend hungout at the house with my family several times before we went on our first date. Out of the few boyfriends I had, they all hungout with my family first.
I still had mostly guy friends in high school and it was no big deal for me to go hunting, fishing, and mud riding with them. I was like everyone’s little sister, so when I did have a boyfriend, they were usually given a hard time.😃

I think it depends on the kid. If I have a girl who is like me when it comes to boys, I’m sure that I will treat her like my mom treated me. If I have a boy crazy child I may be stricter on her. It all depends on the kiddo. 🙂
 
I’m 18 and I’ve never once gone on a date.

I am getting more interested in guys, but I don’t feel anywhere near ready to be married yet, so I wait. I personally believe that dating shouldn’t start until one is ready for marriage. That can mean different things to different people, but my primary focus right now needs to be college. So I am getting to understand guys and build friendships with them, but not dating and not leading anybody on thinking that I am interested in that, either.

I’ll date when and if I find the right type of guy, at the right time.

Obviously by 18, a parent has no control over their child’s dating or lack thereof, unless they are still living with them. But I don’t think most 18 year olds are ready to start building that type of relationship.
 
definitely later rather than earlier. and i thik it’s very important for parents to be in constant comminucaiton with their kids the whole way. unfortunately, there is sometimes a tendency to sweep the conversation of sex under the rug which ultimately does more harm than good. though i’m juust one of those odd ones who really doesn’t have much desire for marriage. i feel like God has called me to do other things. i’ve only had one sort of romantic interest but i relized that wasn’t going to work so backed off. and besides, there’s a pretty slim chance of someone actually wanting to marry me so i think i should just focus on other things
 
16

Old enough to drive in case driving oneself home from a date becomes necessary for any reason, and this could be a life-saving skill in some situations.

I met my husband at 13 or 14.
We dated off and on from about 16 until we got serious at 18. Got engaged at 18.
Married at 19.

Been married for 15 years and counting. 🙂

A teenager, even in America, is old enough chronologically to be discerning marriage. Many individual teens may be too irresponsible to handle dating with an eye for marriage, but then again, so are many 30-somethings.

So I think 16 should be the baseline age for beginning dating, and then it should be between the parents and teen to discuss the types of dates that are appropriate and safe.
 
I expect I’ll be alone or in the definite minority on this, but our view has been that dating shouldn’t occur until one is ready to begin contemplating marriage. The temptation to sexual sin will be greatly reduced by not going out alone with members of the opposite sex. Group dates, where it’s understood that no one is going to be leaving the main group to isolate themselves … and where the group is doing something fun and wholesome: amusement park, eating out, movies, bowling can be fine. But one on one dating at 16-17-18…there’s no reason for it. No mainstream Catholic is going to be for early marriage, so why favor throwing your kids into temptation years and years before they can even consider getting married? The statistics on even “good Catholic kids” entering college and ending up in sexual relationships is about 80% … throw in contraception, STD’s and abortions … I don’t think we can assume our kids are stronger than we were.🤷
I agree with this post 100%. It is best during the teenage years to do group dates as suggested. thank-you for your honesty and bravery.
 
I think it depends on the individual in question.

I’d like to say that there is no dating until 18, but the truth is that my husband and I started dating at 16 and got married at 22. Hard to tell my kids that dating isn’t allowed when they wouldn’t be here if my parents had had the same rule! Still, any dating that goes on under my roof will be well supervised and moderated by me.
 
It really depends on the person. My grandparents actually started seeing each other when my grandmother was 13. You can fall in love pretty young and have a lifelong marriage. I honestly don’t see a problem with going out on dates and getting to know what you are looking for in the opposite sex. Going out on a date does not mean you will automatically engage in something immoral. Dates can be very innocent. It just depends on the people and their values.
 
I accept other poster’s opinions based on their own young dating experience. However, I ask **(and I’m not asking you to answer this on the forum, just to yourselves), **were you or were you not involved intimately before you married? Were you able to just keep it at hand holding and sharing french fries, or did it progress over the years to something else? If you held it together I am very impressed and happy for you. Many of us didn’t and don’t want that for our kids.
 
It really depends on the person… I honestly don’t see a problem with going out on dates and getting to know what you are looking for in the opposite sex. Going out on a date does not mean you will automatically engage in something immoral. Dates can be very innocent. It just depends on the people and their values.
👍
 
I accept other poster’s opinions based on their own young dating experience. However, I ask **(and I’m not asking you to answer this on the forum, just to yourselves), **were you or were you not involved intimately before you married? Were you able to just keep it at hand holding and sharing french fries, or did it progress over the years to something else? If you held it together I am very impressed and happy for you. Many of us didn’t and don’t want that for our kids.
I think being open, talking, and teaching kids is better than keeping them locked up. Honestly, if they have a car and a little bit of free time, they can have sex. It doesn’t take long to do the do.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top