Tim Staples debating Mike Gendron

  • Thread starter Thread starter Roman_Catholic_1
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I’m sure we all remember in the Bible when the rich young man aked Jesus, “What must I do to be saved?”

Jesus responded, “Just accept me as your personal Lord and Saviour.”

Wait a minute, that doesn’t sound right…
He also never says to the rich young man to believe in the pope, indulgences, co-redeeming works of mary, baptism, and purgatory to be saved either…I would encourage you to read the rest of that passage and you will see that even the disciples knew they couldn’t be saved based upon what Jesus was saying to the man. Unfortunately none of us are “good” when it comes to standing before God. We have all sinned and deserve hell. That is why Jesus stated later in that verse that “with people this is impossible, but with God all things are possible.” Hence, we cant save ourselves by works etc…only by Jesus. Blessings
 
No, but he does indicate obedience to those who “sit on the seat of Moses”. Clearly, they speak for Him. Heck, if we can think we speak for Him based on our opinions of Scripture, why not those who have been commisioned to do so?
 
Both, 2 Timothy 3:16 says, “All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness.”
When this statement was made, the New Testament was not in written form!
Timothy is stating that the Old Testament is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness.
Does this imply that the New Testament should not be considered?
Or sacred Tradition - that is that instruction from Jesus to his Apostles and from them to their sucessors and disciples?
That sacred Tradition was retained for generations and part of it was written into the books that were declared canonical by Pope Damsus in the late fourth century - we now refer to it as the New Testament and it includes the source that you quote - Timothy!
 
I am reading this blog because it started with comments about Mike Gendron debating Tim Staples. I’ve recently come in email contact with Mr. Gendron. (Last week, before I even found out about the debate.) I tried to engage Mr. Gendron in a discussion about the Rosary and the verses he used to argue were the same as the the ones this John555 guy is using.

I’m shocked at how easy it is to predict what these evangelical protestants will say about Catholicism. Really, it would be pretty easy to publish an encyclopedia with charts showing the accurate Catholic theological responses to each of these predictable strains of thought that bother the protestants. (This has probably already been done.)

When Mr. Gendron realized I was going to stay on the point and not let him lead me, and when I gave him loads of correct information, he simply cut off contact. I haven’t heard from him again. All I wanted to do was ask him to add to his teaching that the Rosary is a meditative prayer on scripture, and the prayers themselves are from scripture. (I didn’t expect him to be fair, but I wanted to see if he knew he was being unfair. He does.)

He was kind of condescending to me assuring me that he ALREADY KNEW the Rosary was a meditative prayer on the gospels, but when he teaches it to protestants, of course he won’t tell that part. Then he told me that I didn’t know the “true gospel” and that I didn’t know the “consequences of a bad choice”. I told him thanks for the concern, and that talking to him was allowing me to sharpen my understanding of my Catholic faith.

Maybe that’s why he cut me off. Either he’s given up on me and my salvation, or he’s realized I know my faith and he can’t hoodwink me, or maybe he didn’t want to be the catalyst for driving me into deeper understanding of my Catholic faith.

Anyway, all anti-catholics are predictable. Learn your faith and don’t be afraid of them. Be more afraid of just letting them go with NO correction at all. I doubt anything I said will change Mr. Gendron’s views, but I believe I was obedient to God in challenging him. He really though he could send me one copy of his outrageous newsletter and I’d actually say “Oh, dear! Thank you so much for teaching me the true gospel, I made a huge mistake in attending RCIA (not once but twice, once as a sponsor) and converting from fundamentalism, and reading the Church fathers, and listening to the Holy Spirit. Now that I’ve heard YOUR talk Mr. Gendron. . .well, I’ll just give up the Eucharist that has helped me not only straighten out my mind, but also understand the Bible in context for the first time. . .and all because of YOUR little newsletter, Mr. Gendron.”

Now, really, WHY would I want to put the scales back on my eyes?

Again, don’t be afraid of these anti-catholics. Learn your faith and have confidence that you and I are in the right place. Be as nice as you can be while giving them your best answer, knowing you are doing the right thing, whether they ever accept what you say or not.
I agree with you, but maybe, just maybe you planted a seed that the Holy Spirit will nurture. Look at Scott Hahn! He used to be VERY anti-Catholic. I agree, us Catholic must learn our Faith and from the right sources. Such as Catholic Answers or EWTN. Watch Fr. John Corapi on EWTN. Hes on several times a week with different series. As well as many other wonderful programs. I recently attended a conference by Fr. Corapi and it was a real eye opener. I wish every Catholic on earth could have heard him. God Bless, Memaw
 
This is all I could find but I couldn’t open it because my internet connection is almost non-existant. I have to know how it ended, can anybody listen to it and let me know?:gopray2:

relevantradio.com/NETCOMMUNITY/Page.aspx?&pid=209&srcid=275

God bless

EDIT* looks like that link does nothing. It appears you have to sign into the web-site 😦
I agree. I sign in and click and it is automatically deleted. Can anyone show precisely how you sign up to listen to the debate?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top