T
Tantum_ergo
Guest
Joining with codebilly and Soutane here. 


**Originally Posted by ron77nyc **
** I remember seeing women dressed in black on thier knees **beating their breasts at the altar and kissing the feet of a statue of the Blessed Virgin ****when I was a boy growing up in an Italian neighborhood in New York.
Response Soutane:
**Good for them!!! ****We still have little old Italian ladies who beat their breast at the altar during consecration (as do I) **and lovingly touch the statue of Our Lady Of Mount Carmel (as do I)
Strangely enough it is these devout women who attend mass EACH day.
This is where you are judging incorrectly. There is a conflict between scripture and tradition. Father, Son and Holy Spirit all live in us. This is what the apostles taught and this is what the church teaches if you dig in and search.They are revealing so much about themselves.I guess that I’ve gone beyond irritation or annoyance about their “misconceptions”,which I believe are quite deliberate and wilful and have gone into fullblown concern for the state of their souls due to the utilization of lies and halftruths for the sake of “winning” an arguement.Bearing false witness about one’s neighbour is the BREAKING of a commandment.Calumny is an odious despicable SIN.There are consequences to sin.You may succeed in annoying and vexing us,but what are you doing to your souls?
No form of worship of Jesus is easier than direct personal relationship with Him. Mary’s relationship with Jesus is dearest, most tender, and easiest to understand.
Hi Soutane:
It doesn’t have to be that hard though if Jesus is the absolute focus of your worship and you are in a personal relationship with him.
“What’s in a name? That which we call a roseI appreciate your post here and thank you for the time you put into the response here. I simply do not feel comfortable attributing titles to Mary as coredemptrix and comediatrix as do most anyone who is not Catholic. I think a “thank you” for her saying yes to God is appropriate and sufficient.
There is no conflict only a misunderstanding. Remember that Tradition came before the written word of Scripture. Your statement is contradictory.This is where you are judging incorrectly. There is a conflict between scripture and tradition. Father, Son and Holy Spirit all live in us. This is what the apostles taught and this is what the church teaches if you dig in and search.
If it wasn’t so tragic it would be absolutely entertaining to watch the RCC dance around quotes like that one about Mary being sovereign in heaven.I see your line of reasoning here. But also bear in mind that it is very easy to make the common mistake of anachronistically back projecting modern semantics into a word or phrase that the original author never intended. This will happen progressively more as information is being linked across cultures and times and modern society accelerates its own semantic drift to accommodate the high rate of information assimilation. It is prudent to first examine the character of the man who wrote that and discern that he was a good Christian who clearly would not be so foolish to ever elevate Mary above God nor live in a faith that was inconsistent with his own beliefs. He was Catholic and at no times in the Church’s history has The Church ever elevated Mary to a level of deity or equality with God.
The word “sovereign” can thus pertain to a supreme council or royal family that still has a supreme head - God.
I think we can take it as reasonble that the person who composed that prayer took the word “sovereign” in the human monarchical sense. There are sovereign Kings, Queens, Princes and Princesses sharing authority according to role each has and in accordance with the King’s grant. But only the King is head over all the royal court and his decision is final.
I would say that the person is simply recognizing that God has crowned Mary as Queen of Heaven and when God permits Queen Mary to speak or act she is to be listened to and obeyed with the same respect as if He had spoken. This is an authority thing more than anything. Assigning authority is not the same think as impossibility of assigning divinity or adding a new divine person to “The Trinity”.
In the Catholic Christology Mary is attached at Jesus’ side and we under them as their children. Jesus “Son of Man” is Himself hypostatically attached through His 2nd Person to The Godhead - The Trinity. Yes, clearly this is a very powerful and honored position indeed but it is still NOT divinity. It is the highest honor any created being can possibly ascend to in heaven. But a created soul no matter how pure is finite. It can can not contain God’s infinite spirit - a finite created soul would in a sense explode if it was even permitted to try to contain the infinite God.
Bottom Line:
Mary is sovereign in her authority but not in her created nature. That authority is cooperatively constrained to the extent of God’s Will.
Don’t worry - trust God. Nothing happens in heaven or on earth without God’s consent. Mary is your mother and when she speaks she can be as trusted to speak with God given authority. Most often Mary as Queen Mother speaks to encoruage, compel and warn and always defers to God’s Will.
James
You can’t go back any further than the teachings of Jesus, Paul and Peter. That’s where it started.There is no conflict only a misunderstanding. Remember that Tradition came before the written word of Scripture. Your statement is contradictory.
Once the Canon was complete and the age of the Apostles ended, there was no longer a need for more traditions.You can’t go back any further than the teachings of Jesus, Paul and Peter. That’s where it started.
Yikes … please wipe the spittle from your mouth …… PRAYING TO THE OBJECT OF YOUR OBSSESSION, my! my! my!
You know what they say…
…It certainly LOOKS like a duck…what are those pieces of skin between the toes?..by golly, it WALKS like a duck…what is that long flat beak for?..those feathers, why…and what IS that noise? Is that barking? No, by golly, I think it QUACKS like a duck! But it’s not. It’s really a dog, and we have some very impressive authorities with amazing pedigrees who will back this up, and by the way, what they say can actually trump anything you may have been taught about ducks
Going to Jesus through Mary.Well, Adrift (and James) are right, Ron.
Remember, any ‘appearance’ of contradiction is simply that, an appearance. Why, you can take plenty of passages from Scripture that ‘appear’ to contradict each other, but they don’t really, do they?
If you trust Scripture, then at heart you’re trusting the Catholic Church, because when all’s said and done’, she’s the reason you have it. . .and Martin Luther himself acknowledged it.
Now you said that the Father, Son, and Spirit live in us (and we in them). Very true. Now, what ‘Sacred Tradition’ has contradicted this? I can think of none.
It’s not that at all. I don’t think that is necessary. Does that mean I’m anti-Catholic? I’ve never done it that way. St. Paul says we can approach the throne of grace with freedom and confidence.Ron, we go to Jesus through St. Paul, we go to Jesus through each other. . . remember, we are all members of the Body. We don’t go to Jesus and ‘bypass’ all the other members of His body, do we? I think you are somehow thinking that Jesus is ‘separate’ from ‘the Body’, and that if one speaks of Mary or another saint, that one is ‘separating’ them from, and putting them in opposition to, Jesus.
I understand that but what I don’t understand is this: Talking about Jesus and praying to God without an intermediary gets people agitated. Why is that?St. Louis de Montfort spoke of “Jesus in Mary”. . .not as though Mary was the ‘greater’ and Jesus was ‘contained’, but rather that Jesus, like the sun, is reflected by Mary, the moon. The light of the sun is IN the light of the moon, isn’t it?
I guess you didn’t really read what I said. I was praising those folks for their goodness.Ron, only Christ knows their hearts,your heart,or mine.Not you.Do you not see how arrogant you sound?
Ron, please sincerely try to understand “relationship” with Jesus. Relationship with Jesus Christ is not limited to your current understanding.It’s not that at all. I don’t think that is necessary. Does that mean I’m anti-Catholic? I’ve never done it that way. St. Paul says we can approach the throne of grace with freedom and confidence.
I understand that but what I don’t understand is this: Talking about Jesus and praying to God without an intermediary gets people agitated. Why is that?