Traditionalist and Charismatic

  • Thread starter Thread starter henrikhank
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
But you didn’t intially say that we are to live the spirit of poverty; you said that we are supposed to be living poverty, which is different.

Regarding the gifts and charisms of the Holy Ghost, the Church teaches that we should cooperate with the graces given by the Holy Ghost for our sanctification, through frequent reception of the sacraments, staying true to Church teaching, staying in a state of grace through regular confession and penance. To my knowledge, the traditional teaching does not include the “gifts of the Holy Spirit” in regards to speaking in tongues, prophecy, or being slain in the spirit as imparting sanctifying grace. Perhaps you can show Church teaching which proves otherwise?
Honestly, Denise. If you cannot accept the instruction of the Apostle Paul in the Scriptures, I really don’t think anything else will help. In fact,given the number of informative links you have been given, it seems pretty clear that you are not able to encompass the fact that God has given charismatic gifts to everyone, and that they are to function alongside the sacraments for the building up of the believer, and the body.
 
Honestly, Denise. If you cannot accept the instruction of the Apostle Paul in the Scriptures, I really don’t think anything else will help. In fact,given the number of informative links you have been given, it seems pretty clear that you are not able to encompass the fact that God has given charismatic gifts to everyone, and that they are to function alongside the sacraments for the building up of the believer, and the body.
I’m a simple-minded person, and not an intellectual like yourself.

Are you going to respond my question regarding your statement about how we have to answer to God if we supposedly leave by the side of the road or bury “Gifts” that He chooses to give us? Please take notice that I’m not asking for your private interpretation of Scripture. I’m asking for bonafide Church teaching.
 
I’m a simple-minded person, and not an intellectual like yourself.

Are you going to respond my question regarding your statement about how we have to answer to God if we supposedly leave by the side of the road or bury “Gifts” that He chooses to give us? Please take notice that I’m not asking for your private interpretation of Scripture. I’m asking for bonafide Church teaching.
I must have missed a post, because I could not find any such question. I think if you are not able to accept the Teaching of the Apostles present in the Holy Scriptures, then there is nothing else that will really be of much use. The interpreter of Scripture is the Church, not any private individual. You have been given quotes from the Vatican documents, the catechism, and members of the Magesterium. I think that is the best that anyone can do.

Hopefully others that are reading the thread may find these resources more useful than you have.

May God bless you, and keep you, my beloved sister. :highprayer:
 
The gifts of the Holy Spirit, indeed the Holy Spirit Himself, are a blank space on which you can write anything.

Traditionalists are more concerned with getting to a TLM (or indeed finding one at all), than with developing spiritual powers.

I’m afraid that if Charismaticism involves people babbling at Mass or trying to jazz it up, then that’s a giveaway for me. They just don’t get it, biblical quotes notwithstanding. Hard to imagine the Apostles behaving like that.
 
The gifts of the Holy Spirit, indeed the Holy Spirit Himself, are a blank space on which you can write anything.

Traditionalists are more concerned with getting to a TLM (or indeed finding one at all), than with developing spiritual powers.

I’m afraid that if Charismaticism involves people babbling at Mass or trying to jazz it up, then that’s a giveaway for me. They just don’t get it, biblical quotes notwithstanding. Hard to imagine the Apostles behaving like that.
A very telling post. I sincerely hope you are not intending to speak for all “traditionalists”.
 
I must have missed a post, because I could not find any such question. I think if you are not able to accept the Teaching of the Apostles present in the Holy Scriptures, then there is nothing else that will really be of much use. The interpreter of Scripture is the Church, not any private individual. You have been given quotes from the Vatican documents, the catechism, and members of the Magesterium. I think that is the best that anyone can do.

Hopefully others that are reading the thread may find these resources more useful than you have.

May God bless you, and keep you, my beloved sister. :highprayer:
I appreciate you kind sentiments in this post. I hope that you can see that Charismaticism and Traditionalism are worlds apart, really. I don’t think that Charismatics are bad or have bad intentions. Despite what I’ve written, I think that they are good people…just misguided.

I agree with Inquisitor Max’s latest post, in that traditional Catholics are more concerned with getting to a TLM than with developing spiritual powers. I, for one, just want to worship Our Lord in the reverent and dignified manner in which He deserves.
 
Thank you everyone for your enlightening posts. In my small Parish, the first active lay group was Cahrismatic for several years, until we initiated a group for the Sacred Heart Devotion. What I learned is that many who were already in the Charismatic group came to the Sacred Heart group. Some told me that they wished the Sacred Heart devotion was here first, because that is what they actually needed. I think there is a hunger for God in the souls of the people, and they must address it, and for my case, the available group was Charismatics for several years.
Again, it is the same over here as I am noticing from your posts from elsewhere (I am in Africa) that the Charismatic group need extra guidance for observing the traditions of the Catholic Church, especially the Rosary and the Saints. I am not judging, but just observing.
 
So…you don’t believe that Catholics are going against the Church if they don’t accept CR, or that we have to accept what Charismatics believe as absolutely necessary to hold the Catholic faith? Okay…but you believe that we will have to answer to God for burying, or leaving by the side of the road, supposed “Gifts” that He wants to give us, correct?
Exactly how will we have to answer to Him, according to Church teaching?
I don’t think they’re going against the Catholic faith is they don’t accept the CR. They don’t have to. Like also you don’t have to accept something like Fatima.

I do think you do have to accept the charisms as part of the ordinary Christian life, because that’s part of Church teaching. If you don’t accept that, you don’t accept something that’s part of Church teaching.

I’m sure everyone will have to answer for the many times we’ve neglected to make use of the gifts (both supernatural and natural) God has given us, and the times we’ve buried them for whatever reason. Only Our Lady ever really made full use of them. All of us are guilty.
 
The gifts of the Holy Spirit, indeed the Holy Spirit Himself, are a blank space on which you can write anything.

Traditionalists are more concerned with getting to a TLM (or indeed finding one at all), than with developing spiritual powers.

I’m afraid that if Charismaticism involves people babbling at Mass or trying to jazz it up, then that’s a giveaway for me. They just don’t get it, biblical quotes notwithstanding. Hard to imagine the Apostles behaving like that.
The Holy Spirit Himself is NOT a blank space on which you can write anything. Where on earth are you pulling that from? The Holy Spirit is GOD. That is extremely relativistic. You don’t define what the Holy Spirit is. He’s truth itself, and to say that would mean that you yourself would have to be God. That makes no logical or theological sense at all. The gifts of the Holy Spirit are defined in the Bible and in the Catechism (though those lifts are exhaustive).

Your focus should be on getting to Mass to receive the Eucharist and participate in the reality of what the Mass is - and this will be a way of seeking spiritual gifts (especially love, the greatest of spiritual gifts). If you’re just going to TLM because that’s your preference, and your focus in life is getting there because you like the TLM better, not because of what the Mass is, then your guilty of the same mistake that you’re criticizing against. You go to Mass not because you like it, or it feels good. You go to Mass to adore Christ. And to do that, you need the Holy Spirit and His gifts.

If you’re absolutely convinced that that’s what “Charismaticism” is… But in any case, the Apostle did behave a bit like that. You notice they were thought drunk because they came out of the upper room ‘babbling’ in tongues and over the top enthusiastic about the faith. Without the experience of Pentecost, the natural tendency is to mirror the Apostles’ pre-Pentecost behavior: locked up behind closed doors only concerned for themselves. I hope that’s not what being a traditionalist is, being comfortable at the TLM and scared of going out and preaching the Gospel and concerned only with themselves. Because that’s really what I see. It’s not very Catholic or traditional. After every Mass, in which we are filled with the fullness of God Himself, we’re supposed to burst out of the Church and proclaim the Gospel in the fiery enthusiasm of Pentecost.
 
The gifts of the Holy Spirit, indeed the Holy Spirit Himself, are a blank space on which you can write anything.
I don’t know what you are trying to say here, Inq, but on it’s face, this is a blatantly heretical statement.

The HS is the third person of the Trinity, divine, immutable, the very fullness of the Godhead present in the Church. Not only can mankind not “write anything” upon God our creator and Giver of Life, but nothing that we can do can in any way tinge His omnipotent nature. You may need to revisit the catechism of the Church. :eek:

“Holy Spirit” is the proper name of the one whom we adore and glorify with the Father and the Son. The Church has received this name from the Lord and professes it in the Baptism of her new children.

The term “Spirit” translates the Hebrew word ruah, which, in its primary sense, means breath, air, wind. Jesus indeed uses the sensory image of the wind to suggest to Nicodemus the transcendent newness of him who is personally God’s breath, the divine Spirit. On the other hand, “Spirit” and “Holy” are divine attributes common to the three divine persons. By joining the two terms, Scripture, liturgy, and theological language designate the inexpressible person of the Holy Spirit, without any possible equivocation with other uses of the terms “spirit” and “holy.”
Code:
  Traditionalists are more concerned with getting to a TLM (or indeed finding one at all), than with developing spiritual powers.
There is no contradicdtion or opposition between the TLM and developing as a Christian. When one uses the gifts that God gives them, they grow spiritually, and they serve the Church. This is important whether we attend a Divine Litugy (Eastern), Traditional Latin Mass, or Novus Ordo.

We are to GROW UP, and BE TRANSFORMED. This will not happen if our only devotion to God happens during Mass once a week. That is taking one well balanced and nourishing meal once a week, and thinking it is sufficient to meet our needs.
Code:
 I'm afraid that if Charismaticism involves people babbling at Mass or trying to jazz it up, then that's a giveaway for me. They just don't get it, biblical quotes notwithstanding. Hard to imagine the Apostles behaving like that.
I agree. I am not familiar with the term “charismaticism”. This thread is my first exposure to such a term. Perhaps it does include “babbling”, but since I have not experience with it, I am not in a position to say.

The daily experience and use of the charismatic gifts, on the other hand, includes no “babbling”, and is not an effort to “jazz up” the Mass, but one’s own soul to God’s use. We are commanded by God to stir ourselves and one another to good works.

I find it sad that Traditionalists on this thread seem to have so little regard for the contents of the Holy Scriptures.
 
I don’t think they’re going against the Catholic faith is they don’t accept the CR. They don’t have to. Like also you don’t have to accept something like Fatima.

I do think you do have to accept the charisms as part of the ordinary Christian life, because that’s part of Church teaching. If you don’t accept that, you don’t accept something that’s part of Church teaching.

I’m sure everyone will have to answer for the many times we’ve neglected to make use of the gifts (both supernatural and natural) God has given us, and the times we’ve buried them for whatever reason. Only Our Lady ever really made full use of them. All of us are guilty.
I don’t have to accept that “Charisms” are an ordinary part of Christian life. And it’s not Church teaching that I have to accept it. Extraordinary - perhaps. If you and other Charismatics feel compelled to speak in tongues and prophecy, that’s your choice, but it was never a part of ordinary CATHOLIC Christian life. Protestant Christian life; yes, for quite some time now, for the Pentacostal Hillbilly denominations.

It’s not Church teaching that I have to answer to God if I don’t ask to have the gift of tongues or prophecy. Such silliness! If these gifts were given to me (without asking) I would go to my confessor for guidance. It is not a part of Church teaching that we must ask for these “gifts.”

You believe that Our Lady made full use of these gifts? How? That’s a new one (and I’m quite familiar with the approved Marian apparitions)!
 
Code:
I appreciate you kind sentiments in this post. I hope that you can see that Charismaticism and Traditionalism are worlds apart, really.
I think I do see that. Since I am unclear what the word “charismaticism” means, all I can go by is how it has been referenced on this thread. From what I can tell, it has nothing to do with Catholic faith at all. In fact, it may be a product of some people’s imagination.

It seems to me that spreading false notions like those that have been characterized in this thread as “charismaticism” is damaging to the body of Christ. I may have said this in response to the very first post of the thread,but it did not become clear to me until later the term “charmismaticism” seems to be use to refer to abuses and fears of people that don;t understand and are closed to the authentic gifts of the Holy Spirit to the Church.
Code:
  I don't think that Charismatics are bad or have bad intentions. Despite what I've written, I think that they are good people...just misguided.
It has certainly become abundantly clear that one can be equally misguided, whether one is open to the Gifts of God, or completely closed off to them.
I agree with Inquisitor Max’s latest post, in that traditional Catholics are more concerned with getting to a TLM than with developing spiritual powers. I, for one, just want to worship Our Lord in the reverent and dignified manner in which He deserves.
Although such an approach to one’s spirituality is very narrow and limiting, it is certainly not damaging in any way. We can always pray that the persons attending the TLM will hear the Word of God preached during that time, so that their spirits become open for all the abundance of God’s gifts that he has for them, and that, at some point, they will become open to the equipping of themselves to do the work of the ministry. 👍
 
Being “charismatic” should involve responding to the graces of baptism and confirmation and living daily in the reality of Pentecost. That means developing and using the gifts the Holy Spirit has given each of us, of which the charismatic gifts are a part. Speaking in tongues is one of those gifts, and if there is ecclesiastic approval from the proper authority, I don’t see a problem with that at Mass. If there is not, I do. As for “jazzing up the Mass”, if you mean playing rock and roll music, or something like that, at Mass, I disapprove of this. We should use proper liturgical music at Mass, following the model of Gregorian chant. But we should be fully involved in the liturgy, and our joy and enthusiasm should be apparent.
 
I don’t have to accept that “Charisms” are an ordinary part of Christian life. And it’s not Church teaching that I have to accept it. Extraordinary - perhaps. If you and other Charismatics feel compelled to speak in tongues and prophecy, that’s your choice, but it was never a part of ordinary CATHOLIC Christian life. Protestant Christian life; yes, for quite some time now, for the Pentacostal Hillbilly denominations.

It’s not Church teaching that I have to answer to God if I don’t ask to have the gift of tongues or prophecy. Such silliness! If these gifts were given to me (without asking) I would go to my confessor for guidance. It is not a part of Church teaching that we must ask for these “gifts.”

You believe that Our Lady made full use of these gifts? How? That’s a new one (and I’m quite familiar with the approved Marian apparitions)!
I was speaking in general about the charismatic gifts, which aren’t limited to extraordinary things like tongues, prophecy and miracles.

You do have to accept that the charisms (speaking somewhat generally here) are part of the ordinary Christian life because the Bible and the Catechism and the Magisterium (especially through Vatican II) say so. I’ve validated this claim many many times with numerous quotes.

Speaking in tongues was obviously part of Catholic life as we see in the Acts of the Apostles and in the letters of St. Paul. So was prophecy. We can also see this from records and documents of early Christian rites of initiation. I’ve also validated this claim with several quotes from Church Fathers.

In Corinthinas 14 Paul says to strive to prohesy, as well as he wishes “all of you would speak in tongues”. I’ve posted links to a homily by St. John Chrysostom on this numerous times.

What I said at the end of my post I meant in general not only with supernatural gifts but also natural talents. Our Lady made full use of these. But she is recorded to having spoken in tongues, in Acts 2. Since she was there in the Upper Room at Pentecost.

Going to your confessor for guidance is a very good practice.
 
Code:
I don't have to accept that "Charisms" are an ordinary part of Christian life.
I know this is true, Denise. God made us in his own likeness and image, and that means we all have free will. There are hundreds of thousands of so called “Catholics” that pick and choose which parts of the Church teaching they are willing to accept. They believe they can reject part of the Catholic faith, and still be Catholics in good standing. They are commonly called “cafeteria catholics”.
Code:
  And it's not Church teaching that I have to accept it.
You are right. The Church teaches that no article of faith or doctrine can be compulsed upon a person, and that every soul must be free to reject the Truth.
Code:
Extraordinary - perhaps. If you and other Charismatics feel compelled to speak in tongues and prophecy, that's your choice, but it was never a part of ordinary CATHOLIC Christian life.
It is not a compulsion, but a privilege to receive the Gifts of God. The HS never “compluses” anyone. Just as you are not “compelled” to accept the doctrines of the faith.

It has always been an ordinary part of Catholic Christian life. People have not always practiced the faith in the same way the Apostles did. That is why the Apostles spoke in tongues, and most now do not. Some elements of the faith have fallen by they wayside, presumably because many individuals did not know, or refused to accept that such things are part of the normal Catholic faith experience.
It’s not Church teaching that I have to answer to God if I don’t ask to have the gift of tongues or prophecy. Such silliness!
We will all have to answer for God if we willfully and stubbornly reject the doctrines of the faith, and if we refuse to use the gifts he has given us for the service of the Church.
If these gifts were given to me (without asking) I would go to my confessor for guidance. It is not a part of Church teaching that we must ask for these “gifts.”
You are right. Most of us are baptized as infants, and the charismatic gifts, along with the gift of salvation are afforded to us without asking. All of us have received these gifts in our baptism. When one begins to unwrap and use those gifts, it is most appropriate to seek spiritual direction. 👍
Code:
You believe that Our Lady made full use of these gifts? How? That's a new one (and I'm quite familiar with the approved Marian apparitions)!
Is there some reason she would be denied by God? When they were in the upper room, do you think the tongues of fire passed her by?
 
I was speaking in general about the charismatic gifts, which aren’t limited to extraordinary things like tongues, prophecy and miracles.

You do have to accept that the charisms (speaking somewhat generally here) are part of the ordinary Christian life because the Bible and the Catechism and the Magisterium (especially through Vatican II) say so. I’ve validated this claim many many times with numerous quotes.

Speaking in tongues was obviously part of Catholic life as we see in the Acts of the Apostles and in the letters of St. Paul. So was prophecy. We can also see this from records and documents of early Christian rites of initiation. I’ve also validated this claim with several quotes from Church Fathers.

In Corinthinas 14 Paul says to strive to prohesy, as well as he wishes “all of you would speak in tongues”. I’ve posted links to a homily by St. John Chrysostom on this numerous times.

What I said at the end of my post I meant in general not only with supernatural gifts but also natural talents. Our Lady made full use of these. But she is recorded to having spoken in tongues, in Acts 2. Since she was there in the Upper Room at Pentecost.

Going to your confessor for guidance is a very good practice.
Where does the catechism say that the Charisms which Charismatics ascribe to (speaking in tongues and prophecies) should be, or are, a part of ordinary Christian life?
 
Where does the catechism say that the Charisms which Charismatics ascribe to (speaking in tongues and prophecies) should be, or are, a part of ordinary Christian life?
The links and passages from Scripture have been posted in the thread, Denise. If you don’t want to look at them, or understand them, that is your choice. There is one reference that has not been posted, though:

is the neglect of revealed truth or the willful refusal to assent to it. "Heresy is the obstinate post-baptismal denial of some truth which must be believed with divine and catholic faith, or it is likewise an obstinate doubt concerning the same; apostasy is the total repudiation of the Christian faith; schism is the refusal of submission to the Roman Pontiff or of communion with the members of the Church subject to him."Incredulity

Incredulity is a grave matter. :eek:
 
Where does the catechism say that the Charisms which Charismatics ascribe to (speaking in tongues and prophecies) should be, or are, a part of ordinary Christian life?
It speaks more in general about the charisms listed in Corinthians 12, see paragraph 2003 among others. It says sometimes these charisms are more extraordinary (such as miracles or tongues). This doesn’t mean that tongues or miracles are necessarily very rare, however. I remember hearing about an argument at the Vatican Council over whether tongues and prophecy should be considered “extraordinary” since they seem meant to be so common. It says many many times throughout the CCC that all the faithful share in the prophetic office of Christ. This doesn’t mean specifically that everyone has to go around prophesying, but as Moses says in the book of Numbers “would that everyone could be a prophet of the Lord” (this is when several of the elders began prophesying in the camp).
 
I know this is true, Denise. God made us in his own likeness and image, and that means we all have free will. There are hundreds of thousands of so called “Catholics” that pick and choose which parts of the Church teaching they are willing to accept. They believe they can reject part of the Catholic faith, and still be Catholics in good standing. They are commonly called “cafeteria catholics”.

You are right. The Church teaches that no article of faith or doctrine can be compulsed upon a person, and that every soul must be free to reject the Truth.

It is not a compulsion, but a privilege to receive the Gifts of God. The HS never “compluses” anyone. Just as you are not “compelled” to accept the doctrines of the faith.

It has always been an ordinary part of Catholic Christian life. People have not always practiced the faith in the same way the Apostles did. That is why the Apostles spoke in tongues, and most now do not. Some elements of the faith have fallen by they wayside, presumably because many individuals did not know, or refused to accept that such things are part of the normal Catholic faith experience.

We will all have to answer for God if we willfully and stubbornly reject the doctrines of the faith, and if we refuse to use the gifts he has given us for the service of the Church.

You are right. Most of us are baptized as infants, and the charismatic gifts, along with the gift of salvation are afforded to us without asking. All of us have received these gifts in our baptism. When one begins to unwrap and use those gifts, it is most appropriate to seek spiritual direction. 👍

Is there some reason she would be denied by God? When they were in the upper room, do you think the tongues of fire passed her by?
Sigh

Stubbornly refuse to accept the doctrines of the faith? So what doctrine is it that says that we are supposed to seek speaking in tongues and prophesying?
 
Sigh

Stubbornly refuse to accept the doctrines of the faith? So what doctrine is it that says that we are supposed to seek speaking in tongues and prophesying?
Read Corinthians 14. “Seek eagerly the greatest spiritual gifts: especially that you might prophesy.”
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top