Traditions of Man - Divorce and Remarriage

  • Thread starter Thread starter Eden
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
Eden:
In the same way, you see examples in the Bible of how a marriage can be declared null - “Pauline privilege” and “porneia”. The declaring of a marriage null is called “annulment” because annulment means “to make null”.
Ok now were getting some where, if other Churches follow the exact same Bibical rule but instead of calling it annulement they call it divorce, why do Rc belivers feel the allow 2nd and 3rd marrages, whe RC also remarries ther own after an annulments.
 
40.png
blackbelt:
Ok now were getting some where, if other Churches follow the exact same Bibical rule but instead of calling it annulement they call it divorce, why do Rc belivers feel the allow 2nd and 3rd marrages, whe RC also remarries ther own after an annulments.
Divorce declares a marriage happened but has ended. Annulments declare a sacramental marriage never took place - it declares the sacramental marriage never was. I know this might be confusing the first time you encounter it, but are you seeing the distinction?
 
Hm…why does believers have to choose either divorce or annulment to go separate way? Why wanted to reject gift given by God?. If both parties treat marriage as holy and continue to build their relationship between god and themselves, every problem in marriage can be work out in his name. Why wanted to upset God who give us gift 😦

Isn’t our God can make the impossible turn possible??
 
40.png
happygal:
Hm…why does believers have to choose either divorce or annulment to go separate way? Why wanted to reject gift given by God?. If both parties treat marriage as holy and continue to build their relationship between god and themselves, every problem in marriage can be work out in his name. Why wanted to upset God who give us gift 😦
The problem is, when one or both have not entered into the sacrament because they are not sincere or because they do not understand or because they are not in their right mind, a sacred marriage has NOT taken place. When this happens and one of the parties suspects the other did not enter into the sacrament in a valid way, the sacramental marriage NEVER took place to begin with. An annulment is just an official acknowledgement of that fact. A divorce is the severing of a marriage that was sacramental. The union is valid in the eyes of God. So, any “marriage” following would be an adulterous relationship in the eyes of God.
 
40.png
Eden:
Divorce declares a marriage happened but has ended. Annulments declare a sacramental marriage never took place - it declares the sacramental marriage never was. I know this might be confusing the first time you encounter it, but are you seeing the distinction?
Yes I see the difference in how Rc looks at it, what I am saying is that view in IMHO is incorrect, the bible says “ what God has joined together let NO MAN separate” that would include every living past, present and future man and woman breathing air on the face of the planet if the Popes and bishops and priests breath air then they are included. ( I mean no disrespect of them)

Now if RC takes that position that the marriage in question never took place then they are denying the fact that in the marriage God has blessed them and that God joined them in marriage.

Where as other churches admit that God has joined and blessed the marriage and the divorce is a SIN. But RC because of there view of annulment are saying there was no marriage so there can be no sin and they can marry aging, this is a loop hole to deal with the problem of Rc members leaving there spouse so they had to come up with a solution and not go against Gods word so bingo annulments was born.

From what the Holy Spirit has reviled to me when 2 people are joined as one it is the Spirit of the 2 that become one and when these 2 split the sin has been committed the stain is there and it can not be undone BUT the stain on the soul can be washed by Christ blood spirtually of course.

And this view is biblical and makes sense, when 2 people join in one spirit (marriage) the 2 involved experience a very deep knowledge of each other , mind you some marriages go deeper that others and no one can go deeper than God in ones soul (heart) .
 
40.png
blackbelt:
Yes I see the difference in how Rc looks at it, what I am saying is that view in IMHO is incorrect, the bible says “ what God has joined together let NO MAN separate” that would include every living past, present and future man and woman breathing air on the face of the planet if the Popes and bishops and priests breath air then they are included. ( I mean no disrespect of them)
But an annulment is an acknowledgement that God never joined them together because one or both of the parties failed to satisfy the requirements necessary for this sacred union to be valid. The rules for a civil marriage would have been fulfilled on that day, but not for a sacred union in the eyes of God.

One of them made a false commitment on the altar which was not recognized in the eyes of God either because they deceived the other, they were mentally incapacitated (this can include being under the influence of a drug) or they did not understand what they were committing to.
 
A little more to understand how the Church can declare whether or not a sacramental marriage took place.

The consent of the couple is at the heart of the ceremony. Of all of the seven sacraments, this is the only one in the Western Church conferred not by a sacred minister but by the participants themselves. The priest is present to witness the marriage in the name of the Church and to bless it, but the wedding itself takes place through the public consent of the couple. It is for this reason that the priest invites the man and woman to declare their consent:
"Since it is your intention to enter into marriage, join your right hands, and declare your consent before God and His Church.

After receiving their consent, the priest invokes God’s blessings on their decision and reminds everyone present that what God has joined, human beings “must not divide”.

(This is an excerpt from The Catholic Way by Bishop Donald W. Wuerl)

You can see then, that the consent of both couples before God is what makes the sacrament valid. If one or both does not consent to the sacrament in mind and heart at that moment, they have not created a valid union in the eyes of God.
 
40.png
Eden:
But an annulment is an acknowledgement that God never joined them together because one or both of the parties failed to satisfy the requirements necessary for this sacred union to be valid. The rules for a civil marriage would have been fulfilled on that day, but not for a sacred union in the eyes of God.

One of them made a false commitment on the altar which was not recognized in the eyes of God either because they deceived the other, they were mentally incapacitated (this can include being under the influence of a drug) or they did not understand what they were committing to.
I understand the reasoning of RC, but the bible also says that when we pray or ask for blessings that 'IT IS DONE" in other words when a marriage is blessed and a priest prays over the couple believe that it is done!, this is a deep part of our faith!

This is why also Jesus said that if we even think of having sexual relations with another it is still adultery because we have the desire in our hearts (soul), the sin is committed against the spirit and in spirit we have joined with the one we desired to have sex with.

A marriage is no different only difference is we take it one step future and marry the partner , but before we married them we were sexually actuated to them and then fall in love with them. But as the years go by for some we need to grow and understand that sex is not love but desire and love (AGAP ) is the highest good of the other which is the same love that God loves us with.

So in every respect of Jesus’s teachings it all lines up with divorce is a sin and the RC view has stumbling blocks when it comes to there view on this and what Christ taught.
 
40.png
blackbelt:
So in every respect of Jesus’s teachings it all lines up with divorce is a sin and the RC view has stumbling blocks when it comes to there view on this and what Christ taught.
I don’t agree that the Sacrament of Matrimony as understood by the Church is a stumbling block to what Christ taught. Christ elevated marriage to the status of Sacrament and the Church has always recognized it as such.

“Flee wicked arts; but all the more discourse regarding them. Speak to my sisters, that they love in our Lord, and that their husbands be sufficient for them in the flesh and spirit. Then, again, charge my brethren in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that they love their wives, as our Lord His Church. If any man is able in power to continue in purity, to the honour of the flesh of our Lord, let him continue so without boasting; if he boasts, he is undone; if he become known apart from the bishop, he has destroyed himself. It is becoming, therefore, to men and women who marry, that they marry with the counsel of the bishop, that the marriage may be in our Lord, and not in lust. Let everything, therefore, be done for the honour of God.” Ignatius of Antioch, To Polycarp, 5 (A.D. 110).

St. Ignatius was bishop of Antioch. He was said to have been ordained by Peter himself. He was auditor to the apostles. You can see in this quote that he refers to a marriage being “in our Lord and not in lust”. This quote illustrates that the early Christians understood a sacramental marriage has certain factors which must take place in order to be valid.
 
40.png
Eden:
The problem is, when one or both have not entered into the sacrament because they are not sincere or because they do not understand or because they are not in their right mind, a sacred marriage has NOT taken place. When this happens and one of the parties suspects the other did not enter into the sacrament in a valid way, the sacramental marriage NEVER took place to begin with. An annulment is just an official acknowledgement of that fact. A divorce is the severing of a marriage that was sacramental. The union is valid in the eyes of God. So, any “marriage” following would be an adulterous relationship in the eyes of God.
Well anyway, the explaination from catholic/protestant stand their own point. As long as whoever have their first marriage failed. Meaning they do not treat it holy and do not believe in working out their problem through God. As believer, we should bear in mind, before we say I DO is better to ask yourself whether are you willingly to spend the rest of our life with our partner, thur problems and hardship and at the same time walk hand in hand through god. If your first thoughts is not certain, then PLEASE give time to yrself and reconsider before saying I DO. We walk in faith and if one does not have faith in God then how should one be able to work out any problems in marriage. Divorce/Annulment is just not the main solution. Is the faith we have in God…God never please with separation of marriage he give to all believers…Is we human who make it turn sour!!! So what if pple go through couple of failed marriage, does meaning each and everytime divorce/annulment continue, till they find their perfect partner!!! How can that be!!!
 
40.png
happygal:
God never please with separation of marriage he give to all believers…Is we human who make it turn sour!!! So what if pple go through couple of failed marriage, does meaning each and everytime divorce/annulment continue, till they find their perfect partner!!! How can that be!!!
I completely agree with you that it is an affront to God to outwardly portray a posture of sincerity of heart and to inwardly reject the sacred element of matrimony.

It is a terrible societal problem we have - the casual way in which marriage is regarded. It is to the detriment of our families and to our faith that marriage and divorce are so easy to come by in this society and that divorce and remarriage have lost their stigma.

The reason so many more marriages end with annulments in the Church is a reflection of our society in general which influences even Catholics to regard marriage as just a ceremony with the best dresses, flowers, decorations, music and reception venue and not as a sacrament before God.

Marrying has become to some degree - a money-making business in the West. We have “the wedding industry”. Do we have more annulments (marriages null from the start) because our culture emphasizes the superficial over the sacred? I don’t know what is presented in each individual annulment petition to the tribunal to make a judgment as to whether or not the increase in annulments in the U.S. since 1930 is valid or not.

The sacredness of marriage is certainly under attack in our society. I think we can all agree on that.
 
40.png
Eden:
I don’t agree that the Sacrament of Matrimony as understood by the Church is a stumbling block to what Christ taught. Christ elevated marriage to the status of Sacrament and the Church has always recognized it as such.

QUOTE]

I was speaking of annulment , matrimony is blessed
 
40.png
blackbelt:
40.png
Eden:
I don’t agree that the Sacrament of Matrimony as understood by the Church is a stumbling block to what Christ taught. Christ elevated marriage to the status of Sacrament and the Church has always recognized it as such.

QUOTE]

I was speaking of annulment , matrimony is blessed
How is an annulment a stumbling block to what Christ taught?

Annulment: A declaration that a valid marriage never existed
 
40.png
Eden:
40.png
blackbelt:
How is an annulment a stumbling block to what Christ taught?
because you fail to see the sin against the spirit and Christ spoke about the inner man (spirit & soul) and that sin is done aginst the spirit and once ist done ist done
 
40.png
blackbelt:
40.png
Eden:
because you fail to see the sin against the spirit and Christ spoke about the inner man (spirit & soul) and that sin is done aginst the spirit and once ist done ist done
An annulment does not cause sin, it is a recognition that the intent before God never existed.

Again, how does allowing divorce and remarriage in other Christian faiths seem justified in light of all you have presented?
 
40.png
Eden:
40.png
blackbelt:
An annulment does not cause sin, it is a recognition that the intent before God never existed.

Again, how does allowing divorce and remarriage in other Christian faiths seem justified in light of all you have presented?
I disagree intent before God is there for most again we do not know the hart of all people , we all take oaths in Gods name and then try and justify why we go against that oath When a couple gets married they believe in there hearts this is the one to marry we all want that white picket fence that nice home that perfect marriage, but then comes Kids, Bills, Mortgage, Illness, Problems problems problems but instead of looking to Christ for relief and guidance in there ignorance they look to another partner or want out of the problem so they split , but weather a divorce or annulment the fact remains the Kids suffer and the family unit is no more.

Please don,nt get me wrong all I have present goes for all Christians including myself, there is no justification of divorce or annulments weather one is RC or Prostanant, or Baptist or what ever , except for what Christ taught and even in a case of adultry i belive that the couple must honestly and humbally try and reconsile.

Remember IM born and raised RC , but a few years ago I had a supernatural experience with God that led me to study Gods word and I have had some revelations and understandings since and still do , but because of this I learned to separate mans laws with Gods laws , but because you and I see different on this point of annulment does not make you better than I or I better than you we are both Gods children.

I understand the Vatican has a real problem with this so do other denominations, there trying to deal with it the best they can, but we still have to see divorce/annulment for what it is a spiritual sin , IMHO until we see that, we will continue in this dilemma of separation of Gods families and kids growing up with single parents or living on the streets.

What is the first step to an alcoholics recovery? ADMITANCE, in other words “ Hi I’m Frank and I’m an Alcoholic” OR what is the first step to being saved! Recognize that we are SINNERS now that we know what we are we understand that we need a savior. Same analogy in a marriage once moms and dads understand that it’s a sin period we begin the healing process
 
40.png
blackbelt:
40.png
Eden:
Problems problems problems but instead of looking to Christ for relief and guidance in there ignorance they look to another partner or want out of the problem so they split , but weather a divorce or annulment the fact remains the Kids suffer.

Please don,nt get me wrong all I have present goes for all Christians including myself, there is no justification of divorce or annulments weather one is RC or Prostanant, or Baptist or what ever , except for what Christ taught .
I can tell you that if someone is still suffering the effects of alcohol or drug use when they marry or if they say they will convert to Catholicism, attend RCIA and then after the marriage say they never intended to become Catholic and that they believe it is all bunk that is cause for investigating whether a sacred union ever took place.

You are assuming that every person ends up on the altar for the right reasons, looking for the white picket fence, etc. Unfortunately, that is just not the case. Sometimes the motive comes down to what St. Ignatius refers to when he says “that the marriage may be in our Lord, and not in lust”.

You are free, obviously, to disagree with Church teaching. I believe that the Church teaches only truth on matters of faith and morals. I believe that it is possible for a marriage in a church that is blessed by a priest to not have been sacramental because one or both parties did not have the intent.

Unfortunately, none of what we are discussing addresses the Christian denominations which allow for divorce and remarriage. People get remarried after divorce in Christian churches all the time. Why is this happening and how is it justified biblically?
 
The position of the RCC on annulments is basically a smokescreen designed to hide the fact that the RCC is handing out divorces. This is clear from the fact that the overwhelming majority of people who apply for an annulment will get it, and in most cases it is on the basis of “defective consent”. It is a rather serious abuse of situations where an annulment might be justified, as happened before Vatican II and where the rate of annulments was much much smaller than what is seen today. Just about anyone can get an annulment based on the condition of “defective consent.” There is no difference in the real world between a couple or a family which has undergone a RC annulment, based on “defective consent”, or one which has undergone a Protestant divorce. The results and the setup is exactly the same in both cases. First there is a marriage ceremony. then the couple live together for a while and perhaps have one or more children. Then one of the partners wants out of the marriage. So they apply for the breakup. In one case it is called a divorce, in the other it is called an annulment. But the result is exactly the same. After the official recognition of the breakup, both partners are free to remarry. It is just a word game that is being played by Roman Catholics where they sanctimoniously say that they are against divorce, but then they go around and allow the overwhelming majority of people who apply for an annulment to have it. You said you wanted statistics. I gave you some already to show that the rate of increase of family breakups among Catholics has far exceeded the divorce rate in the USA at large. And I do not detect any sympathy for the children of the families which have been broken by the RC system of marriage annulments. These children are suffering, due to the marraige annulmente given out by the RCC which have wrecked their families and destroyed their relationship with their two parents.
 
40.png
Eden:
40.png
blackbelt:
Unfortunately, none of what we are discussing addresses the Christian denominations which allow for divorce and remarriage. People get remarried after divorce in Christian churches all the time. Why is this happening and how is it justified biblically?
This has been addressed, Christian denominations do not allow for it except for adultery as Christ taught, the only difference between RC and other Christians is that Christians see it as a sin and RC goes around and says no the marriage never happened.

If you were to see spiritual that it is a blemish on ones soul to divorce or annul only then could you see that even after annulment its remarriage.

You can not undo what is done, if a woman is pregnant she can undo it we all know that’s called abortion but the fact remains its a sin and it produces bad fruit. A break up weather its a divorce or an annulment produces bad fruit. What ever is not of God or his ways produces bad fruit, God is good and can only produce good fruit, nothing good comes out of annulments so we can see that this act is not of Gods ways.
 
40.png
Eden:
Unless your parents had an annulment, please do not speak for children of annulled marriages. .
That’s where we differ. I think that children who are harmed by marital breakups should be listened to and heard.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top