J
Joie_de_Vivre
Guest
EBH&T is longer than LGBT which is counterproductive for simplification.EBH&T? But then that is as long as the one being used. Oh well-I guess there is no solution to the initial proliferation.
EBH&T is longer than LGBT which is counterproductive for simplification.EBH&T? But then that is as long as the one being used. Oh well-I guess there is no solution to the initial proliferation.
My personal mood, intent and posting style is off topic.…To Lion IRC - there’s no need to answer every “hope you’re doing well today” with snark. Just ignore it. And those who are suggesting you trying to reframe your comments are right. I agree with a lot of what you say, but, no one will listen to a banging gong or noisy cymbal (forgive my biblical misquote).
I see, so what is a completely objective view toward the idea that individuals with a mental illness owe an apology to others for the inconvenience and hardship their mental illness, which they did not ask for and do not want, has caused these other people? What’s the completely objective view one should have toward someone who, after demanding such an apology and claiming said apology is needed in order to help the individual with their mental illness, proceeds to ignore an apology given to them because said apology comes from someone who does not fit their “it’s all about me, me, me” justification for demanding the apology?To others, (including Rin), Oldguy, maybe Cherry, some others (I not only lost track of the point of this thread by reading ~600 posts, but also who’s taken what position by all the sniping and smart-xxx replies) while compassion is certainly evident in your posts, it is also clear that the matter has been internalised so much so that it may be preventing a completely objective view. Step outside and TRY to understand your opponent’s point of view. Go watch a CA Apologist in a debate. They NEVER resort to the name calling and one-upsmanship this post has devolved to.
Yes, I noticed that. Now Grace tells me I am insensitive. My warped sense of humor strikes again!EBH&T is longer than LGBT which is counterproductive for simplification.
If you are a white heterosexual male you are not allowed to be offended by anything. just saying.That group that calls themselves “Q- Nation” kind of offends me since the “Q” word is somewhat of a pejorative or IS, if some quibble with my just saying “somewhat” but from there vantage point, perhaps it is justified.
.
I don’t speak for Lion IRC but I remember a thread, maybe it was a torture thread where you excused yourself. We all probably should do that from time to time. However, I’m unaware of what was said that might need an apology. Still, as we are always told, discuss the issues themselves. Peace my Brother.I see, so what is a completely objective view toward the idea that individuals with a mental illness owe an apology to others for the inconvenience and hardship their mental illness, which they did not ask for and do not want, has caused these other people? What’s the completely objective view one should have toward someone who, after demanding such an apology and claiming said apology is needed in order to help the individual with their mental illness, proceeds to ignore an apology given to them because said apology comes from someone who does not fit their “it’s all about me, me, me” justification for demanding the apology?
Ah, sorry, estesbob. I didn’t realize you were attempting to be funny.Yes, I noticed that. Now Grace tells me I am insensitive. My warped sense of humor strikes again!![]()
Story of my lifeAh, sorry, estesbob. I didn’t realize you were attempting to be funny.
Thank you, I’ll take your advice.I don’t speak for Lion IRC but I remember a thread, maybe it was a torture thread where you excused yourself. We all probably should do that from time to time. However, I’m unaware of what was said that might need an apology. Still, as we are always told, discuss the issues themselves. Peace my Brother.
Story of my life![]()
Isn’t it possible that instead of trying to legitimize the feelings of every delusional person on the planet so that they still feel good about themselves, we point out the fact that ALL human beings are flawed and broken and in need of redemption, not just those of a particular group? It’s becoming a reasonable question to ask just how far do we have to go to accommodate people’s delusions in order to spare their feelings?But why would someone who describes herself by the acronyms you’re questioning ever engage in a conversation with someone who is flip about them? Isn’t this the crux of this story’s experience? The girl who killed herself felt her responses were being ignored (and according to her, belittled). That can’t help in trying to reach out to someone like her.
I’m not interested in convincing transgender people that they’re “delusional.” I don’t think they are. But even if I did, I’m a teacher. And the Socratic method is by far the most successful approach in my experience. Outright snarky dismissal of what one firmly believes doesn’t lead that person to reconsider anything in my experience.Isn’t it possible that instead of trying to legitimize the feelings of every delusional person on the planet so that they still feel good about themselves, we point out the fact that ALL human beings are flawed and broken and in need of redemption, not just those of a particular group? It’s becoming a reasonable question to ask just how far do we have to go to accommodate people’s delusions in order to spare their feelings?
I would quibble with these statistics. Many surveys such as these on LGBTIQ people are not done as a poll would be done, with a crosssection of society or those involved, but are self-selecting. One such survey I read part of the details of said the news had been desseminated on forums dedicated to trnasgender people and other information sources for the community, as the author put it, and those who wanted to came and answered the questions.https://catholictrans.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/2014-11-04-transyouthsupport.jpg?w=602&h=1024
Somewhat different numbers between those supported and rejected by family.
http://content.gallup.com/origin/ga...roduction/Cms/POLL/q10eg4mu3e-ock3lcb3hgq.gif
LGBT people are more likely to be poor and poor people people are more likely to experience higher rate of mental illness and domestic violence; family rejection is associated with poverty, higher rates of mental illness, domestic violence and suicide.
I’m not aware of the Socratic method requiring abject surrender by the teacher until the student decides to change his mind and agree. That’s what referring to a transgender person using the incorrect gender pronoun really is. Or maybe I’m misunderstanding you.I’m not interested in convincing transgender people that they’re “delusional.” I don’t think they are. But even if I did, I’m a teacher. And the Socratic method is by far the most successful approach in my experience. Outright snarky dismissal of what one firmly believes doesn’t lead that person to reconsider anything in my experience.
Not to mention the fact that 40% of homeless youth are LGBT, greatly outsurpassing their percentage of the population, which is closer to 4-5%.As to the income questions, part of all this is related to the work they tend to get into: women in general tend to get into fields which do not pay as much as fields men are more likely to get into. Considering the higher likelihood of a homosexual man’s going into a lower-paying field (music, art), along with the higher likelihood among the homosexual population as a whole of mental illness and other difficulties, it is not surprising that they often have lower incomes, for reasons which may well be apart from homosexuality.
Joshua Alcorns parents:On Twitter, columnist and author Dan Savage demanded an indictment on charges such as child abuse, neglect, reckless endangerment and manslaughter. “#LeelahAlcorn’s parents threw her in front of that truck,” Savage tweeted, referring to the semi tractor trailer that struck Alcorn early Sunday when she stepped in front of it. “They should be ashamed—but 1st they need to be shamed. Charges should be brought.”
“We told him that we loved him unconditionally. We loved him no matter what.
Where are you getting that the kids are thrown out? I’m sure there are probably some, but I’m not seeing that as a factor in the article…Not to mention the fact that 40% of homeless youth are LGBT, greatly outsurpassing their percentage of the population, which is closer to 4-5%.
williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/press/americas-shame-40-of-homeless-youth-are-lgbt-kids/
How anyone can throw their kid out of their house merely for being gay or transgender I have no idea. It is cruel and heartless.