Perhaps I’ve been reading too many of your posts causing me to slip into the passive voice.
Well done. Now, if you could furnish us with your theory as to how we came to be here? Unless you’re like Buzz and literally have no idea.Freddy:
Perhaps I’ve been reading too many of your posts causing me to slip into the passive voice.
However, I corrected the slip…
You might consider upping the dosage on those meds.
I need medication because I’m asking you for your views on the process which brought us to this point? Rather than continuously deflecting, why not simply answer the question? You must have some idea. I’m sure even Buzz does even though he says not.Freddy:
You might consider upping the dosage on those meds.
Asked and answered – more than once. Having multiple senior moments? If so answering again will only cause you more frustrations; indulging your weakness may accelerate senility. You’ll find re-reading the posts good therapy – or are you just troll/baiting?
That’s not quite true. Your suggestion to go back a hundred posts or so came up with zilch. And I went back a lot further than that just in case I missed something. You have offered nothing. I’m sure that if you did you could simply repeat it or give us a post number.Freddy:
Asked and answered – more than once. Having multiple senior moments? If so answering again will only cause you more frustrations; indulging your weakness may accelerate senility. You’ll find re-reading the posts good therapy – or are you just troll/baiting?
No. That would do you a disservice. Did you know that taking on difficult mental tasks can prevent or slow down alzheimer’s disease?
So there was no explanation. You can use the next post to give one if you like.Freddy:
No.
Stephen J. Gould : "The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persist as the trade secret of paleontology . The evolutionary trees that adorn our textbooks have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils…”
Quite true - DNA points to sheep dogs and poodles sharing a common ancestor – the wolf. However, DNA does not demonstrate that humans and birds share a common ancestor, for example.
Have you ever considered the possibility that the Fall (original sin) might have something to do with these ailments, including your so-called useless appendix?
No one except atheists needs to accept the Darwinist explanation for the history of life on earth – it’s irrelevant, both theologically and scientifically. However, a good reason for rejecting Darwinist folklore is that it is not a convincing explanation for the fossil record.
I was reasonable and thought about it … then I rejected Darwinism at as an adequate explanation for the history of life on earth. The truth can set you free, too.
That is excellent Darwinian propaganda, but what a pity it isn’t true. The Cambrian explosion flat-out contradicts “common descent” and Darwinian evolution.
When we are (hopefully) resurrected into our glorified bodies, will we have to wait billions of years for those bodies to evolve from a bug? I hope not.
This is what the Cambrian explosion appears to demonstrate – life-forms appearing suddenly without any evidence of evolution. For some odd reason, theistic evolutionists have a great deal of trouble accepting this demonstration of God’s miraculous creative power.
That depends what you mean by “evolution”. I accept that scientific evidence suggests “evolution” has taken place – the first organisms that came into existence were simple prokaryotes and later comes all the diversity of life seen in the fossil record and then the life we we see on earth today – that history could be described as “evolution”.
Not all folks who reject Darwinism are Bible literalists and not all of them do so because of religious reasons. For example, you can read every anti-Darwinism article published at evolutionnews.org (Discovery Institute) and you will not come across one argument based on religion or some Bible text or some personal “vision of God” – all their arguments are 100% based on scientific evidence.
Believed nothing which you claim he did. Gould was a staunch evolutionist, and would rightly call you out on cherry-picking quotes of his to support your position.
A refuted position which has had no supportive evidence provided whatsoever.
That’s why so much of our DNA is common between us!
I have. It’s a ridiculous theory. No changes in the human anatomy have ever been detected among fossils or ancient mummified remains which would indicate such a sudden change.
Of course. However, some theories are simply worse than others. We have evidence; we are not in a vacuum.
Once again, a baseless, debunked statement.
Nobody has said this except you.
Because it’s not a miraculous creation event.
Wow, what a reliable source
Funniest thing I’ve seen all day. One look at the organization’s history says the exact opposite.
) If we were made in God’s and the Darwin theory were true, God would have to be an animal. God wanted us to be free like Him, so he gave us a soul and free will - two things animals don’t have. We have to be like God, just like it says we are. If we are evolved animals, God must be an animal. If God is an animal, that would mean animals are like God. He clearly has free will, so all animals would have to free will, which they don’t. Do not believe what mankind says of things. They try to explain how creation could’ve happened without God being real. Obviously, this is foolishness to the highest degree. Another thing that’s foolishness is thinking we could be sure of something when, according to them, it happened “billions of years” ago. People believe this because of human pride and the feeling of the need to know something. Man can go insane from ignorance, and that’s one of the biggest things to for someone to ) 
The prevailing opinion is that Genesis is figurative poetry.
If you decide that every part of it must be literal.
First: Impersonal and personal are completely subjective and unrelated to the manner of creation.
We are both. They are not mutually exclusive.
Who said the soul evolved? I have claimed the exact opposite.
Meaning His mental and spiritual image; logical, rational minds which do many things out of reach for lesser ones. It does not mean physical image. God has no physical image.
If a part of a book is poetry, and part nonfiction, does that mean even the poetry is nonfiction? No. Genesis is not one literary genre. It is a mix.One cannot take one part of Genesis, and not the rest. It also involves a detailed history tracing generations from Adam and Eve to Noah. I believe it traces all the way to Abraham, but I’ll leave y’all to check that. (I can’t do all the work!
False.
This entire section rests on the false notion that God created man in His physical likeness, which is impossible since God does not have one. We cannot look like what does not exist.
God and evolution have not, are not, and will never be mutually exclusive. Even the Church says so. To claim otherwise is to claim to know more than the Church.
Do those quotation marks mean you disagree with the age of the Earth?
No. We believe this because the careful methods of hypothesis, testing, and evaluating have revealed it to us. There is no pride involved.
It is not silly talk, unless you just don’t believe in the use of science at all. There’s nothing special about evolution when it comes to other science. It’s just another field, but gets singled out by creationists for one reason or another.
Evolution is not satanic or a lie from him. Evolution is science, nothing more. I don’t really know what else to say to respond to such a claim.
I’ve said it many times and I will say it again. It is physically impossible for all fossilized fauna and flora to have coexisted at any point in Earth’s history. Period. If you want to know more about why, I will tell you. If not, then this point stands and I will continue to bring it up to debunk the “great flood wiped out the dinosaurs” myth.
Myths are mythical, not reality.
False. They are referring to multi-millenial periods of widespread glaciation. It has nothing to do with global floods.
That would be plate tectonics. Not only have all continents been united a great many times in Earth’s history, humans would never have survived in Pangaea, like almost every other thing alive today.
God did not “tell us” that the flood broke up the continents. You read that into the passage. Plate tectonics broke up the continents, and continue to move them across the Earth.
Yes, because the weight of evidence is against your version of the flood. Frankly, you are wrong, and the unlying evidence is right.
The flood would not change radiometric dating and make it so unreliable, nor would it change anything outside of Earth which we use to date the age of the Solar System.
As airtight as a convertible with the top down.
Then your feelings are not in accordance with reality.
That’s what we call “coincidence.”
I will agree with you once all of science is proven completely wrong and any evidence at all to support your beliefs comes to light.
It started with the Big Bang. No asteroid involved. Don’t know where that idea came from…
Ignoring the fact that your conception of the Big Bang is very far off, both planets and asteroids form as a result of the interactions of matter according to physical laws. There is no mystery as to why these things happen. I have explained before how these things occur, and I will again if needed.something had to have created both the asteroid and the planet. What could create such things that was impersonal (when they are both so carefully designed) and did not have power like God does? (Insert “Think About It” meme