Oh, I’m happy now. Happy that the blood of at least three ethnic groups flow in my veins without causing me any discomfort whatsoever. Happy that I don’t have to resort to placating one stream so that the other can flow, or to exaggerating the reasonable demands of one stream so as to invalidate said demands. I’m happy about a lot of things actually, including the fact that the God who created all races loves them each equally.
Is there more than one definition of justice? How does that work?
That would be a rational, impartial definition of justice. However, there are some out there, prancing around the halls of the US Capital, addressing the Chamber of the House, who will not be satisfied until George Zimmerman placed on the headsman’s block.
Honestly Scott, I expected a different genre of discourse from you.
Ya, its been a rough week.
Sometimes I get testy when I read or watch the complete irrationality of some people in this case. I don’t mean you, I mean, in general.So the only way you can make a 911 call and report weird behavior is if someone else is there with you and/or sees it? Fantasy land. One person reporting it in a court of law holds up. . I know.
Let’s just say I have a higher expectation of people. There are (and always have been) extremists on every side of an issue. All that matters in this specific case, is that the parents get justice for their son. The rest, we’re grown up enough - generally speaking - to deal with.
If you’re going to paraphrase, please do me the kindness of paraphrasing accurately. Again, a suspicious person was reported, with no accompanying suspicious behavior related. Those are facts which speak for themselves.
Already forgiven. Tried to delete but wasn’t fast enough, obviously.Ya, its been a rough week.
This is an example of what I am talking about:
Maybe the girlfriend is waiting to sign for a book deal?
What’s really weird is if a 17 year old committed a crime against a 10 year old, eveyrbody and his brother would be talking about the man who inflicted harm against a little kid.
you had made a claim that trayvon had called 911, yet you didn’t have a link to back it up. when asked later you gave an article stating the articles were taken down. if you knew they were taken down, i would have thought you’d have known there was no evidence of a call and would not have stated that there was. maybe you didn’t know they were taken down until after you posted that?
Why would you think it’s required?
I figured it was that or she has a stake in the civil trial.
seekerz seems to want, and feel free to correct me if I am wrong, Zimmerman to make a statement to the press either personally or through his attorney. She wants to know why he thought Martin was on drugs. Why did he think that Martin was acting suspiciously.
The reason for the suspicious behavior was given… I mean .how many times do you have to say it? As well, when or why is it necessary to have someone standing next to you on phone to corroborate the behavior. You simply report what you see. If someone else sees the behavior that you did , your lucky. Many times thats not the case. It comes down to refusing to believe Zimmerman on the behavior. Thats shows bias towards one view.seekerz seems to want, and feel free to correct me if I am wrong, Zimmerman to make a statement to the press either personally or through his attorney. She wants to know why he thought Martin was on drugs. Why did he think that Martin was acting suspiciously.
Simply saying that someone was acting suspiciously isn’t enough. She wants to know why. Otherwise she doesn’t believe there was any reason for his phone call to 911 (or the non-emergency number) other than racial profiling. Forget the fact that he didn’t seem to know Martin’s race when he first called. Unless he can give concrete reasons, or better yet, have already given those reasons to the police, she believes he was using racial profiling.
And because he was using racial profiling…I am not sure what that means.
