Trump accuses Obama administration of wiretapping Trump Tower phones

  • Thread starter Thread starter kat07
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The Trump administration really does have a problem with leaks. There is a new article in the Washington Post with the title, “Inside Trump’s fury: The president rages at leaks, setbacks and accusations.” The article makes him sound a little unhinged with statement like, “Trump was mad — steaming, raging mad.” And then it says:

“This account of the administration’s tumultuous recent days is based on interviews with 17 top White House officials, members of Congress and friends of the president, many of whom requested anonymity to speak candidly.”

washingtonpost.com/politics/inside-trumps-fury-the-president-rages-at-leaks-setbacks-and-accusations/2017/03/05/40713af4-01df-11e7-ad5b-d22680e18d10_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_trumptumult-830pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.02d8a4f05661

His administration is leaking like a sieve.
 
Hardly any of the MSM articles I’ve read about contacts between Trump’s people and the Russians have said that there is any proof that anything illegal took place. Most of them have admitted that these might have been perfectly innocent meetings. It’s the Trump people who have been acting suspiciously as if they had something to hide. Why else would they have had the Russian ambassador come for a secret meeting at Trump Tower? He didn’t come in the front entrance where he might have been seen by reporters. Instead, he was admitted secretly by a side entrance. And then there was Sen. Session’s evasive answers about contacts between people connected to the Trump campaign with the Russians at his confirmation hearing. He should have disclosed his own meetings with the Russian ambassador.
According to The Telegraph, Mike Flynn and Jared Kushner were at the meeting with the Russian ambassador at Trump Tower, post-election in December. I don’t know if it is esbalished fact that the ambassador came through a back entrance. The telegraph article says “reportedly”.

How many other meetings with ambassadors or officials have been left undisclosed? Maybe many. I doubt every meeting that had happened at Trump tower has been disclosed as to those that attended and presumably there is not a legal requirement that the participants of every meeting has to be disclosed.
 
The Trump administration really does have a problem with leaks. There is a new article in the Washington Post with the title, “Inside Trump’s fury: The president rages at leaks, setbacks and accusations.” The article makes him sound a little unhinged with statement like, “Trump was mad — steaming, raging mad.” And then it says:

“This account of the administration’s tumultuous recent days is based on interviews with 17 top White House officials, members of Congress and friends of the president, many of whom requested anonymity to speak candidly.”

washingtonpost.com/politics/inside-trumps-fury-the-president-rages-at-leaks-setbacks-and-accusations/2017/03/05/40713af4-01df-11e7-ad5b-d22680e18d10_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_trumptumult-830pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.02d8a4f05661

His administration is leaking like a sieve.
More anonymous sources… there seem to be reports of what anonymous sources are saying to the media on a regular basis, is there not? Where do these anonymous sources find the time to do there actual jobs?
 
DaddyGirl;14520862]They are not out to “get” Trump; they are out to uncover the* truth.*
:rotfl:

Yes, that’s why they’ve been caught with their pants down so many times.

Really, most folks outside of NYC, DC or LA are not fooled by these talking points anymore.
And let me remind you…Republicans like John M and Lindsey G–among many others-- are just as alarmed and vocal about the same issues re Trump as the Dems and media.
Yes, we know the Democrats have been using them as a false front to advance their agenda, which is a big reason why Donald Trump was the nominee.

They also have state-wide races they have to win and the Senate is a different animal to win.
You’d have to be from outer space not to see that, and not to see that something is really rotten in the state of Denmark … and heavy hands the head that wears the crown.
Welcome to the party. Conservatives have known that for almost 25 years.
 
These sources are usually people on the inside whom the reporter has known for many years whom they trust. And the sources often talk in order to get truth out.
It only takes a 5-minute interview on the phone.

Donald Trump acted as an “anonymous source” for his own stories a few years ago. And he himself has used them. *A lot.
*

.
If the media were soooo trustworthy, these kinds of excuses and defenses would not be necessary.
 
According to The Telegraph, Mike Flynn and Jared Kushner were at the meeting with the Russian ambassador at Trump Tower, post-election in December. I don’t know if it is esbalished fact that the ambassador came through a back entrance. The telegraph article says “reportedly”.

How many other meetings with ambassadors or officials have been left undisclosed? Maybe many. I doubt every meeting that had happened at Trump tower has been disclosed as to those that attended and presumably there is not a legal requirement that the participants of every meeting has to be disclosed.
As one comment already pointed out, the Russian ambassador sat with Democrats during a speech.

Do they have to be investigated as well?
 
Unhealthy being around Trumph these days. So far 8 prominent Russian diplomats and operatives implicated in Trumph-Rusian scandal have died since this scandal broke. The latest Alex Oronov. This includes all the Russian cybersecurity experts responsible for the DNC hack mentioned in the secret dossier during the election.
 
As one comment already pointed out, the Russian ambassador sat with Democrats during a speech.

Do they have to be investigated as well?
The Russian ambassador sat in public with the Democrats, not in a private meeting. The Russian ambassador met in private with Jared Kushner and Mike Flynn at Trump Tower and with Sen. Sessions in his office. There is a difference.
 
Unhealthy being around Trumph these days. So far 8 prominent Russian diplomats and operatives implicated in Trumph-Rusian scandal have died since this scandal broke. The latest Alex Oronov. This includes all the Russian cybersecurity experts responsible for the DNC hack mentioned in the secret dossier during the election.
so what is your evidence of a connection between Trump and 8 prominent Russian diplomats and operatives?
 
so what is your evidence of a connection between Trump and 8 prominent Russian diplomats and operatives?
You can do your own research but some of it is confidential.

It’s amazing how people want to put it us vs. them mentality instead of focusing on the truth. Apparently the cat is out of the bag, CNN reports

CNN Just Confirmed A MAJOR Part of Trump’s Russian Blackmail Dossier


CNN’s Jim Acosta just reported that former Trump foreign policy advisor J.D. Gordon told him that it was Donald Trump himself who ordered the abrupt change in language to the Republican Party’s official policy platform regarding the Russian Federation’s invasion of the Ukraine, the annexation of the Crimean peninsula, and support for the pro-Moscow “rebels” in Donetsk and Luhansk.

Also Carter Page is backtracking on what he previously stated. Seems like the dam just broke.
 
You can do your own research but some of it is confidential.

It’s amazing how people want to put it us vs. them mentality instead of focusing on the truth. Apparently the cat is out of the bag, CNN reports

CNN Just Confirmed A MAJOR Part of Trump’s Russian Blackmail Dossier


CNN’s Jim Acosta just reported that former Trump foreign policy advisor J.D. Gordon told him that it was Donald Trump himself who ordered the abrupt change in language to the Republican Party’s official policy platform regarding the Russian Federation’s invasion of the Ukraine, the annexation of the Crimean peninsula, and support for the pro-Moscow “rebels” in Donetsk and Luhansk.

Also Carter Page is backtracking on what he previously stated. Seems like the dam just broke.
:yawn:

All this shows is Trump isn’t a small-c conservative.

Old news.

And the left needs to get over the fact they lost this election because people didn’t like their ideas---- and understand most of their ideas do not work.
 
:yawn:

All this shows is Trump isn’t a small-c conservative.

Old news.

And the left needs to get over the fact they lost this election because people didn’t like their ideas---- and understand most of their ideas do not work.
+1
 
You can do your own research but some of it is confidential.

It’s amazing how people want to put it us vs. them mentality instead of focusing on the truth. Apparently the cat is out of the bag, CNN reports

CNN Just Confirmed A MAJOR Part of Trump’s Russian Blackmail Dossier


CNN’s Jim Acosta just reported that former Trump foreign policy advisor J.D. Gordon told him that it was Donald Trump himself who ordered the abrupt change in language to the Republican Party’s official policy platform regarding the Russian Federation’s invasion of the Ukraine, the annexation of the Crimean peninsula, and support for the pro-Moscow “rebels” in Donetsk and Luhansk.

Also Carter Page is backtracking on what he previously stated. Seems like the dam just broke.
Fake news
 
Reading reports that the FISA application rejected initially in June was appealed to the FISA review court and successfully appealed - by ALL Clinton appointee judges. Some reports saying the meeting on the tarmac with Loretta Lynch in June could have also been about this as well.

Remember the IRS target of Conservatives were the outcome was no crime. I wouldn’t doubt if Obama and Clinton weaponized the Justice Department to go after Trump; just as Obama had done to Conservatives…
 
Reading reports that the FISA application rejected initially in June was appealed to the FISA review court and successfully appealed - by ALL Clinton appointee judges. Some reports saying the meeting on the tarmac with Loretta Lynch in June could have also been about this as well.

Remember the IRS target of Conservatives were the outcome was no crime. I wouldn’t doubt if Obama and Clinton weaponized the Justice Department to go after Trump; just as Obama had done to Conservatives…
I noticed you did not cite any references for the “reports” you have been reading. “Some say” is not a very reliable source either. Do you have any more support for Trump’s irresponsible allegations than he did (which is none)?
 
As one comment already pointed out, the Russian ambassador sat with Democrats during a speech.
How cute, pivoting to try to make this about the meetings per se; meetings are fine if the content is proper.

So did these Democrats lie about the meeting? Did they attempt to cover it up? Have they claimed amnesia about the what was discussed? Did they assert that nothing improper was discussed then backtrack to saying only that they don’t recall? Did they fumble like this while the was a discussion of potentially illicit contacts?
 
I noticed you did not cite any references for the “reports” you have been reading. “Some say” is not a very reliable source either. Do you have any more support for Trump’s irresponsible allegations than he did (which is none)?
It’s all over alt-right sites and boards. No reports - just speculation and conspiracy theorizing. Many put the initial FISA application after the WJC Lynch meeting - although that meeting was June 27, Some say that HRC’s October 31 tweet on the on the Russian Trump tower computer connection prove that she had inside info on the October FISA; they neglect to note that the story went public that day in Slate.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top