T
Theo520
Guest
I think they’ve been posted several times.Post them. …
Why are you commenting without reading what went on in the meeting?
I think they’ve been posted several times.Post them. …
Retract that video games accusation.Through Google Earth??
Is that as close as you have been with persons from Haiti,Africa…" this kind of people ".?
Have video games affected the brain or what?
We look at the skills they bring to the table. In addition, bringing someone here is not a permanent commitment.Retracted. But pray tell, how should we be considering people who want to come here if the right is not automatic?
I am open to hearing a coherent argument. Nobody has offered a coherent argument as to why the country of origin should matter.Nobody has been able to answer the question to your satisfaction because you are so opposed to such considerations that it is not possible to get you to reconsider your position.
The Dems in the DACA meeting clearly thought country of origin mattered, and Haitians should get preferential treatment of visa allocation.I am open to hearing a coherent argument. Nobody has offered a coherent argument as to why the country of origin should matter.
I disagree with the dems, but that shouldn’t surprise you.The Dems in the DACA meeting clearly thought country of origin mattered, and Haitians should get preferential treatment of visa allocation.
In large part, with the exception of the much-abused H1-B program, the L-1 visa and maybe some smaller exception programs, we do NOT look at their skills. Chain migrants are admitted almost solely on their relationship to the original migrant who petitions for them. That’s something that has to stop.We look at the skills they bring to the table. In addition, bringing someone here is not a permanent commitment.
So you are on Trump’s side in this case, you just would have told them to ‘piss off’ more eloquently,I disagree with the dems, but that shouldn’t surprise you.
Because the culture of that country matters when it comes to considering how well the applicant might assimilate versus how much public support he or she needs. Some countries have produced better migrants than others; I should think that is not in dispute.I am open to hearing a coherent argument. Nobody has offered a coherent argument as to why the country of origin should matter.
We only need to refer to what’s being used already. I think our elected Dem reps were arguing that Haitians deserve special Visa treatment exactly because their country is a s-hole.Because the culture of that country matters when it comes to considering how well the applicant might assimilate versus how much public support he or she needs. Some countries have produced better migrants than others; I should think that is not in dispute.
No, I am not on Trump’s side either.So you are on Trump’s side in this case,
That has nothing to do however with the economic status of the country. There are plenty of countries with per capita incomes in the $1500 range that produce fine immigrants.Because the culture of that country matters when it comes to considering how well the applicant might assimilate versus how much public support he or she needs. Some countries have produced better migrants than others; I should think that is not in dispute.
I am have only taken the position the whether the country of origin is a $h!hole or not is not a decent criterion for informing immigration policy. It will be difficult for you to get me to reconsider that.it is not possible to get you to reconsider your position.
Agreed, in part: American culture is not a monolith.There are many different foreign cultures. Some of those cultures are closer to American culture than others. If you cannot agree with that much, there is nothing further to discuss.
In a universe of very low unemployment?In what universe does it make sense to admit so much competition for jobs?
I think that the reason is more related toe the change in the economy favoring jobs for more highly educated people, while there remains a continuing squeeze on opportunities for low education workers. Again, please note that whatever the origin of this phenomenon, it does not make a case for considering immigration on the basis of country of origin.This is a major reason real wages haven’t risen in inflation adjusted terms in a long time,
Presumably, under discussion is how to deale, is how to deal with people who have been living in America for some time after having been admitted on with temporary protected status. That includes people from Haiti and El Salvador. I think the Trump administration wants to deport them in short order. I have not read about the fate of their children born here while living under TPS.The Dems in the DACA meeting clearly thought country of origin mattered, and Haitians should get preferential treatment of visa allocation.
i strongly support chain immigration. The best resettlement and assimilation program I can think if is the support of family already adapted to and doing well the new country.Chain migrants are admitted almost solely on their relationship to the original migrant who petitions for them. That’s something that has to stop.
How many years for TPS aliens from Haiti and El Salvador?living here illegally for a couple years,
Yes, you have said it. But without foundation. And you appear to be conflating a policy of what to do with legal residents on TPS with applications to enter the US.The Dem argument is as I’ve said, Haitians deserve special treatment because their home country is a “you know what” hole.
Here is an article about aliens in the TPS program. It makes an intriguing claim about the discussion, that I have not heard before:How many years for TPS aliens from Haiti and El Salvador?
President Donald Trump reportedly became enraged during a bipartisan immigration meeting Thursday, after lawmakers proposed allowing long-term recipients of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) to retain legal status in return for ending the diversity visa lottery program. The president wondered aloud why the U.S. would want “all these people from shithole countries.”
Trump’s anger is confusing. He has vowed to crack down on illegal immigration, yet revoking TPS is changing the legal status of hundreds of thousands of immigrants currently living in the U.S. from legal to undocumented. And going forward, this will create a host of other problems for both these immigrants and the U.S. as a whole.