R
So you go ad hominem. Trump said he did not know anything about Lewis. Was the report accurate or not? Trump did not say he “supports” renaming the bridge, at least according to Fox News.Typical CNN hit piece. Trump said nothing bad about Lewis even though Lewis apparently snubbed him, and apparently even praised the man and supports renaming the bridge.
Do you remember what Hillary Clinton did when Gingrich’s mom called her outside her name? It rhymes with ‘witch’. Compare that and Trump’s decision to be small about slights.It sounds like Lewis at one point called Trump a racist.
A lot of us would probably skip going to the funeral of someone who called us that. And that’s besides the other stuff.
No, he was petty and mean spirited.Did you watch the interview? The president was not disrespectful.
That’s a rhetorical device of reducing a person’s stance to an absurd level. It is obvious that no one here said that. You set up a strawman that it will be easy for you to knock down.So you think Trump should have fallen down in worship of Lewis.
What you did not know is hard to believe. However, you have left the subject and now insert your review of John Lewis, which is not the issue.I didn’t know a whole lot about Lewis until his death.
You have nothing about Trump here, just your parochial assessment that John Lewis (in your opinion) ‘did evil’ in his life. Is that Trump’s view or was his reaction just as to Lewis not appearing at his inauguration?We should not speak ill of the dead, no matter how vile some of their actions were, since they might have repented at the last. But neither should we sanctify people who have done evil things even if they have also done good things. Better to note their passing without undue comment.
Trump said he “had no objection” to the re-naming. That’s far from supporting such a move or ‘being fine’ with it. No one claimed that Trump was against the re-naming.Did President Trump say he was against renaming the Edmund Pettus bridge?
I don’t believe he did. I think he said he did not have a problem with that so he
is fine with renaming the bridge - he is not against it…
He certainly did. There’s no denying it. Voting against Infants Born Alive acts, voting in favor of partial birth abortions. Having a 100% pro-abortion NARAL record. That’s evil. I don’t know what Trump thinks about that.John Lewis (in your opinion) ‘did evil’ in his life
We’re not talking about ‘over praise’. The question here is common decency instead of petulance. You know which one Trump chose.As you know, my point was that I believe it’s inappropriate to over-praise a person just because he died.
No it doesn’t mean he doesn’t support it (whew!); it means that he won’t oppose it. I am claiming that he said what he said and that the meaning is obvious.So you are saying when President Trump says he has no objection to the renaming
of the bridge that doesn’t mean he doesn’t support it? You are claiming he said he is against the renaming because he did not phrase the sentence differently and
say he supports it.
That’s not for me to say.So please explain what he would have against renaming the bridge?
I don’t support watermelon seed spitting contests yet I don’t oppose them. The concept is pretty clear.You say he won’t support it. Why not? Yet you also say he won’t oppose it.
This makes no sense.