G
GaryTaylor
Guest
:This is true, unfortunately.
:This is true, unfortunately.
Your still squirming and you support the culture of death. Clear today and in the past, makes no difference of Bernie or Hillary, nice attempt at deflection though. I don’t chase bones either.Gary, I’ve said many times I’m not a Republican or a Democrat. I’m an Independent.
And added to that, what about strip clubs Trump has had ?What about Trumps support of torture, murder of the families of “suspected” terrorists, and violence at his rallies? He epitomizes a culture of death.
yes.He has no blood and his hands unlike those in office.
We can’t read his heart, but we can hear all the lies that he spews. It doesn’t inspire confidence.Your view is sadly a vote for pro-death Hillary Clinton.
Trump says he’s pro-life, you think he’s lying, I ask: are you Padre Pio and can read his heart?
Donald Trump on Abortion
Mike
Catholics should refuse to engage in this kind of conversation with you because you are enamored by Obama who supports abortion and gay marriage.And added to that, what about strip clubs Trump has had ?
Are those part of Christian values ?
Jim
In the end, I guess it will come down to choosing the lesser of two evils. Originally, I was for Rand Paul, but he has dropped out.And added to that, what about strip clubs Trump has had ?
Are those part of Christian values ?
Jim
And added to that, what about strip clubs Trump has had ?
Are those part of Christian values ?
Jim
Oh, I thought you were talking about Bill and Hillary.We can’t read his heart, but we can hear all the lies that he spews. It doesn’t inspire confidence.
I’m talking about Trump. Just want to make that clear.
Oh, Gary, I’m not, I don’t, but I’m not going to argue with you about it.Your still squirming and you support the culture of death. Clear today and in the past, makes no difference of Bernie or Hillary, nice attempt at deflection though. I don’t chase bones either.![]()
They are BOTH pro-death. What about that is hard to comprehend? Trump would have families, innocent families murder for suspected ties to terrorism. How is that not pro death?Your view is sadly a vote for pro-death Hillary Clinton.
Trump says he’s pro-life, you think he’s lying, I ask: are you Padre Pio and can read his heart?
Donald Trump on Abortion
Mike
It’s only a choice between two evils if you make it that way. Vote for a third party that actual espouses your moral values.In the end, I guess it will come down to choosing the lesser of two evils. Originally, I was for Rand Paul, but he has dropped out.
You have no point only hypocrisy and clear on this thread for all to see, and your political position is abundantly clear also for anyone who bothers reading your posts and all of them never mind this thread. I fail to see a rational point anywhere by you in this regard. Your position is now denial of your own documented posts.Oh, Gary, I’m not, I don’t, but I’m not going to argue with you about it.
Trump didn’t say he would murder them. He said He would go after them because he believes these family members know what’s going on. He also said he would obey the law, which means he could only do as far as the law allows and he might try to get the law changed for more flexibility, but there are procedures to follow to achieve that.They are BOTH pro-death. What about that is hard to comprehend? Trump would have families, innocent families murder for suspected ties to terrorism. How is that not pro death?
The previous poster is right, the only moral vote is for a 3rd party.
Thanks. I also apologize to you if I sounded harsh.I realize that happens. Just wanted to let you know the abortion discussion is more on that thread in case you didn’t know. Didn’t mean to offend you. Apologies.
Are you seriously naive enough to think that “go after” doesn’t mean a hellfire missile from a predator drone?Trump didn’t say he would murder them. He said He would go after them because he believes these family members know what’s going on. He also said he would obey the law, which means he could only do as far as the law allows and he might try to get the law changed for more flexibility, but there are procedures to follow to achieve that.
There’s clearly no reasoning with you Gary.You have no point only hypocrisy and clear on this thread for all to see, and your political position is abundantly clear also for anyone who bothers reading your posts and all of them never mind this thread. I fail to see a rational point anywhere by you in this regard. Your position is now denial of your own documented posts.
True. I am also for more parties. I think several parties is better and if no one gets the majority vote, then in the end - have a runoff between the top two vote-getters. Do away with the electoral college and go by the popular vote alone. But in the end case of Hillary versus Trump, it is too early to know now if there will be a third party candidate I can support.It’s only a choice between two evils if you make it that way. Vote for a third party that actual espouses your moral values.
I’m fed up with the false dichotomy that we must vote for one of two parties.
Look, the guy said he’d follow the law and I believe him.Are you seriously naive enough to think that “go after” doesn’t mean a hellfire missile from a predator drone?
Are you seriously naive to think there’s no collateral damage already. Obama just blew up a civilian hospital.Are you seriously naive enough to think that “go after” doesn’t mean a hellfire missile from a predator drone?