Trump's no monster... and he's not mad either

  • Thread starter Thread starter Reuben_J
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
It really is fascinating to see the left not only being oblivious to what lost them the election, but actually doubling down on it.
They lost the election because although they have the numbers, they do not have the states. This is not something that can be fixed in a hurry, but hey, they have eight years.

ICXC NIKA
 
They lost the election because although they have the numbers, they do not have the states. This is not something that can be fixed in a hurry, but hey, they have eight years.

ICXC NIKA
Patience is a virtue. Lets give them 16 years. 😃
 
Patience is a virtue. Lets give them 16 years. 😃
That’s almost a human generation; i.e. those now toddlers will then be voting age.

The liberal sector may by then have discovered that its love of abortion and alternative sexuality is a love that does **not **love them back.

ICXC NIKA
 
You mean that I can stop running in circles, screaming and wetting my pants? What a relief!
The only ones benefiting from all the panic and hysteria is Proctor & Gamble, the makers of adult Pampers.
 
We live in a post-truth world now. Basically whatever the media says and whatever the popular opinion is based on the media’s stories, that is the golden standard in truth. The popular opinion, since liberals dominate all the influential areas (media, academia) is that Trump is Hitler.
I don’t see Trump as a monster, to me that is just some story cooked up by the media.
This ^^^^. Facts do not seem to matter. Information does not seem to matter. The outrage being displayed is based upon pure emotion. (And George Soros’ financing of the rioters/ anarchists helps too.) Where is the critical and reasoned thinking?

As for the media, how many times can one be lied to before one concludes the news is pure propaganda – and then turn off and tune out completely. The longer the riots, the protests, the smashed windows and burned cars, the more people will reject the ideology.

The definition of “insanity” is continuing to do what doesn’t work. The anti-Trumpers are doubling down on what hasn’t worked and won’t work. A great majority of people stay silent and watch; when they awaken, the media and the liberals won’t like the outcome.
 
This ^^^^. Facts do not seem to matter. Information does not seem to matter. The outrage being displayed is based upon pure emotion. (And George Soros’ financing of the rioters/ anarchists helps too.) Where is the critical and reasoned thinking?

As for the media, how many times can one be lied to before one concludes the news is pure propaganda – and then turn off and tune out completely. The longer the riots, the protests, the smashed windows and burned cars, the more people will reject the ideology.

The definition of “insanity” is continuing to do what doesn’t work. The anti-Trumpers are doubling down on what hasn’t worked and won’t work. A great majority of people stay silent and watch; when they awaken, the media and the liberals won’t like the outcome.
Do you believe in climate change? Do you believe 3-5 million illegal votes were cast?
 
Low as it is, it is still the majority.

So do you agree that he is not a ‘monster’? Because if you don’t then you inevitably have to say that of Clinton and Obama, which you would not do.
He is a monster. As conservative I am deeply embarrassed that this vile man bullied his way to the nomination.

I wake each day thanking God that we are one day closer to his being out of office.
 
**Joshman1 Quote:
Do you believe in climate change? Do you believe 3-5 million illegal votes were cast? **

Actually, Josh, if we are going to start taking stances on these two issues or any other issue for that matter, then perhaps we need to be asking a whole lot of critical questions and demanding evidence in support of or in contradiction of the statements being made.

Climate change: Let’s evaluate research on both sides of the climate change debate – reputable scientists who hold differing viewpoints. What is the evidence for each position? Let’s evaluate the evidence and decide from there, shall we?

(As compared to making this a talking point and proposing a new international carbon tax! Color me a skeptic. Climate change and the UN proposals sound like a great way to do global wealth redistribution. But I will withhold judgment pending the research/ evidence.)

3-5 Million Illegal Votes: State by state, representatives of each party present, audit the votes (duplicates or improperly counted), audit the process, audit the poll books (how many are deceased or non-citizens or ineligible). Then lets have a conversation as to whether the voting system is rigged (or not).

(And by the way, it seems that Jill Stein’s audit shut down in Detroit right quick when the ballot boxes that were opened in no way reflected what they purported to reflect. I **am not **generalizing that result nationwide, and it does raise questions, now doesn’t it.)
 
**Joshman1 Quote:
Do you believe in climate change? Do you believe 3-5 million illegal votes were cast? **

Actually, Josh, if we are going to start taking stances on these two issues or any other issue for that matter, then perhaps we need to be asking a whole lot of critical questions and demanding evidence in support of or in contradiction of the statements being made.

Climate change: Let’s evaluate research on both sides of the climate change debate – reputable scientists who hold differing viewpoints. What is the evidence for each position? Let’s evaluate the evidence and decide from there, shall we?

(As compared to making this a talking point and proposing a new international carbon tax! Color me a skeptic. Climate change and the UN proposals sound like a great way to do global wealth redistribution. But I will withhold judgment pending the research/ evidence.)

3-5 Million Illegal Votes: State by state, representatives of each party present, audit the votes (duplicates or improperly counted), audit the process, audit the poll books (how many are deceased or non-citizens or ineligible). Then lets have a conversation as to whether the voting system is rigged (or not).

(And by the way, it seems that Jill Stein’s audit shut down in Detroit right quick when the ballot boxes that were opened in no way reflected what they purported to reflect. I **am not **generalizing that result nationwide, and it does raise questions, now doesn’t it.)
Okay, so no to facts.
 
I get it, Josh, I get it. Quote: “Okay, so no to facts.”

Translation: “You have your facts and I have my facts. There is no such thing as truth, because truth is in the eyes of the believer.” That is a great way to shut down any dialogue. You want talking points and twitter feed. Nothing is solved in that manner.

If it supports your preferred position or agenda, then it is a fact.
If it doesn’t support your preferred position or agenda, then it is not a fact.

Okay, so I interpret your response as: “NO, to open-minded, reasoned consideration of all evidence, options and alternatives as well as differing viewpoints” and “NO, to making sound and solid decisions on that basis.” Your lack of credibility is glaring.
 
I get it, Josh, I get it. Quote: “Okay, so no to facts.”

Translation: “You have your facts and I have my facts. There is no such thing as truth, because truth is in the eyes of the believer.” That is a great way to shut down any dialogue. You want talking points and twitter feed. Nothing is solved in that manner.

If it supports your preferred position or agenda, then it is a fact.
If it doesn’t support your preferred position or agenda, then it is not a fact.

Okay, so I interpret your response as: “NO, to open-minded, reasoned consideration of all evidence, options and alternatives as well as differing viewpoints” and “NO, to making sound and solid decisions on that basis.” Your lack of credibility is glaring.
👍
 
I get it, Josh, I get it. Quote: “Okay, so no to facts.”

Translation: “You have your facts and I have my facts. There is no such thing as truth, because truth is in the eyes of the believer.” That is a great way to shut down any dialogue. You want talking points and twitter feed. Nothing is solved in that manner.

If it supports your preferred position or agenda, then it is a fact.
If it doesn’t support your preferred position or agenda, then it is not a fact.

Okay, so I interpret your response as: “NO, to open-minded, reasoned consideration of all evidence, options and alternatives as well as differing viewpoints” and “NO, to making sound and solid decisions on that basis.” Your lack of credibility is glaring.
To be fair, it is not only those on the left who use these tactics. It has become essentially Standard Operating Procedure for politics in general.
 
“Illegal votes cast” refers only to the popular vote, not the Electoral College.

And no, he’a not a monster. The monster is the fallen angel who deceives. For example, he deceives people into believing that the fetus is not a human being with an immortal soul.
 
And no, he’a not a monster. The monster is the fallen angel who deceives. For example, he deceives people into believing that the fetus is not a human being with an immortal soul.
Absolutely. All of us sinners really want to get in the same ship, pointed away from him.

Really, in the 20th century we have our pick of leaders gone terribly wrong. When Trump has killed off millions of his own citizens, like any number of dictators, then I’ll agree he’s a really bad egg. Heh, the reason I didn’t really like him in the first place was because I saw him as another of Hollywood’s stock, except with more business experience.
 
More sore loser tallk. Impeachment for what?
Impeachment was only 1 thing I mentioned as to why no one knows that he will hold keys to the AF1 for a very long time. But he’s only 2 wks into his Presidency. Give it time. Nixon won in 1972 and by 1974 he was resigning with judiciary committee articles of impeachment hanging over his head before the full House voted. Or Carter was elected in 1976 and lost in 1980.
 
“Illegal votes cast” refers only to the popular vote, not the Electoral College.

And no, he’a not a monster. The monster is the fallen angel who deceives. For example, he deceives people into believing that the fetus is not a human being with an immortal soul.
I am with you one hundred percent on this! For too long we have been governed by a ‘monster’ and we could only look and pray as it come to pass. Hooray, thanks God, we have one President here who is on the side of God, not the fallen angel.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top