Oh, I think it very effective.You keep saying that, but it obviously isn’t convincing anyone. Perhaps you should stop doing so?
But without real statistics, they have no grounding with which to back the claim.One could say inaction on climate change is far worse than abortion
Only to correct the misinformation you’re trying to spread.Oj, I think it very effective.
It’s kept you engaged, hasn’t it?
I’m saying that preeminency does not mean it’s the only thing we can vote for.Besides, the Bishops are the ones saying abortion is the preeminent issue.
Are you saying their words are ineffective?
No statistics? Really? Climate change has no statistics saying we’re on track to seriously mess up the planet?But without real statistics, they have no grounding with which to back the claim.
Which is your personal opinion.The murder of God’s innocent created by the millions far supercedes any other issue.
What is more important than the protection of innocent life by the millions?Which is your personal opinion.
A large group of other issues may outweigh it in the minds of voters, as has been said countless times by others on this forum.What is more important than the protection of innocent life by the millions?
That is untrue and extremely uncharitable.Only to correct the misinformation you’re trying to spread.
No one has said that.I’m saying that preeminency does not mean it’s the only thing we can vote for.
Name one statement I have made that is untrue.
Right there. The thing you’ve been saying this whole discussion, which is absolutely false.One may try to convince themselves that the other issues somehow are of greater importance than life itself, but that is ultimately a dishonest endeavor.
Then what have you been saying?No one has said that.
And that is not the opinion of the Church. That is your own, and is not necessarily true.Helping put someone in power that openly admits they will help continue abortion?
Yes. Absolutely.
So you are trying to lay claim to a possible future as a sufficient reason to ignore the solid death count that is abortion?Climate change has no statistics saying we’re on track to seriously mess up the planet?
Prove it.Right there. The thing you’ve been saying this whole discussion, which is absolutely false.
A guaranteed future without action by governments to solve the problem.So you are trying to lay claim to a possible future
Yes. Babies need a planet to live on. Destroying it is far worse.as a sufficient reason to ignore the solid death count that is abortion?
I already have. The idea that your weighting of issues is objective is preposterous. Others have weighted the issues differently than you and found abortion came up short compared to the coalition of issues they see elsewhere.Prove it.
that is often the case.I would also say that 1ke gave the most complete answer.
Exactly what I said earlier.Then what have you been saying?
In the US, our bishops have also specified that abortion is the preeminent issue.
So while you should consider all the issues on the table at election time, abortion is the preeminent one.
Since you are in Canada, our bishops do not exactly have jurisdiction. So you may want to check with your priest.
No future is guaranteed.A guaranteed future
Which. Is. Your. Personal. Opinion.The preeminent issue, again, wins out.
You have uncharitably accused me of deception.I already have.
. . . .This says much.
When one cannot defend the argument, attack the person.
Apparently this amounts to mear collateral damage in pursuit of fuzzy, lofty ideals. I mean, who would be better suited to care for the poor and end world hunger than a candidate that has no problem with healthy, innocent babies being dismembered with enough precision to leave usable organs unharmed. . . .The murder of God’s innocent created by the millions far supercedes any other issue. As many Catholics have started to loudly decree:
You cannot be Catholic and be in a state of Grace and vote KNOWING someone will help continue this atrocity.