Tucker: Adam Schiff should resign

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cathoholic
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
LeafByNiggle said:
What Adam Schiff did was totally legal
Click to expand...
Using information he knew was false, information he was told was false is legal? How in the world can a representative of the people tell the country absolute lies about the president be legal? Please point out the federal law or article in the constitution that allows this.

We can all speculate on his motives but for some of us it is clear the Democrats have been trying to undermine President Trump from the day he was elected.
 
Maximus1 said:
Fascism is right wing and nationalist.
Click to expand...
Fascism is slightly right of communism. It is left wing and statist.
Maximus1 said:
Overturning election of a duly elected president is inaccurate. It is impeaching by Constitutional process. The only remedy available when the president opperates improperly.
Click to expand...
In this case, it was a coup attempt to overturn a duly elected president.
Maximus1 said:
You say using lies and complicity. Now you are mixing two different things.
Click to expand...
Lies, with the complicity of Obama holdovers in the intel community and the DNC media.
Maximus1 said:
Ambassadors distinguished for bipartisan service.
Click to expand...
🤣🤣

The entire Russia collusion hoax is completely unraveling, and Schiff’s dishonesty is being exposed. There are others, too.
 
But Schiff was, and continues to be elected by his constituents…is this an example of Tucker joining those he has accused of wanting to overturn a election? hmmm…another double standard at best or hypocrisy at worst.
 
Last edited:
This series of lies narrative is like having someone yell 2+2=5 in your face.
It mixed the Republican Mueller investigation with the Ukraine investigation. Two events separated by time. IT IS A DENIAL OF PAST, PRESENT, FUTURE. Getting ambitious?
 
The glerbfarb is the hoosawatcha. That’s why Trump is right! We both know you don’t believe that. Lol
 
I thought it well said, that trust in government grows worse due to the Russian hoax.
 
So when Trump tells the American people no contacts with Russia Opperatives, don’t have over 200 when you say none.
When you say you haven’t met with Russian opperatives don’t have it turn out to be 33 campaign meetings.
When Russians attack with stolen property, don’t become their puppet and disseminate it.
That’s what president’s used to do.
 
Maximus1 said:
This series of lies narrative is like having someone yell 2+2=5 in your face.
Click to expand...
Then Schiff should stop doing It.
Maximus1 said:
It mixed the Republican Mueller investigation with the Ukraine investigation.
Click to expand...
Mueller knew at the start there was no collusion. He spent tens of millions of dollars anyway. His actions may be more egregious than Schiff’s.
Maximus1 said:
Two events separated by time. IT IS A DENIAL OF PAST, PRESENT, FUTURE. Getting ambitious?
Click to expand...
I never mentioned Ukraine. That’s an entirely different false narrative Schiff put forward when the Russia collusion didn’t work.
 
Last edited:
Trump was rightfully elected. Schiff and the others had no right to try and overturn that election with their dishonest story of collusion.
 
dscath said:
But Schiff was, and continues to be elected by his constituents…is this an example of Tucker joining those he has accused of wanting to overturn a election? hmmm…another double standard at best or hypocrisy at worst.
Click to expand...
How is Carlson calling for his resignation a double standard? It would be a double standard if he had power And tried to use it to dishonestly get Schiff removed from office.
 
Schift didn’t hire Mueller,Trump’s political appointee did with McConnell confirming. They arranged total control over Mueller who was Bill BARR’S subordinate. Schiff was in the minority. So I couldn’t possibly guess you were talking about Russia if talking about Schift.
Got to hand it to TRUMP getting to sell Schift when he and Barr exercised 100% control.
Mueller couldn’t bring charges and Trump and the GOP effectively buried the issues.
 
Last edited:
Horton said:
40.png
LeafByNiggle:
What Adam Schiff did was totally legal
Click to expand...
Using information he knew was false, information he was told was false is legal?

How in the world can a representative of the people tell the country absolute lies about the president be legal?
Click to expand...
Was he under oath? If it was a crime to tell lies while not under oath, Trump would have been in jail many times over.
We can all speculate on his motives but for some of us it is clear the Democrats have been trying to undermine President Trump from the day he was elected.
Click to expand...
Again, where does it say in the Constitution that it is illegal to undermine the President?
 
Franco was a “progressive” who pursued extremely socially conservative policies, fought communists at home and abroad, supported the Catholic Church, and restored the monarchy. That is “progressivism” that I can get behind.
 
JonNC said:
Trump was rightfully elected. Schiff and the others had no right to try and overturn that election with their dishonest story of collusion.
Click to expand...
But they had the Constitutional right to try to remove him by impeachment for any reason that they considered high crimes and misdemeanors, regardless of what you think of the basis for their decision. If it was a bad decision that the rest of the countries sees as bad, then the way to remedy that is by voting him out. Not by calling for Schiff to resign. Judging by the lack of public outcry, I would say Schiff has no reason to resign.

The mere fact that the Senate failed to affirm impeachment does not mean those in the House who brought impeachment must resign. If that were the case, then all the Republicans in the House who voted to impeach Clinton should have resigned when the Senate found in Clinton’s favor.
 
Last edited:
LeafByNiggle said:
But they had the Constitutional right to try to remove him by impeachment for any reason that they considered high crimes and misdemeanors, regardless of what you think of the basis for their decision. I
Click to expand...
Except there were none, and they knew there were none.
LeafByNiggle said:
If it was a bad decision that the rest of the countries sees as bad, then the way to remedy that is by voting him out.
Click to expand...
Bad decision? No. Dishonest and underhanded decision.
His district can elect whom ever they please. We can criticize him as he tried to undermine an election.
LeafByNiggle said:
Judging by the lack of public outcry, I would say Schiff has no reason to resign.
Click to expand...
I’m not calling for him to resign. Tucker can, I’m not.
LeafByNiggle said:
The mere fact that the Senate failed to affirm impeachment does not mean those in the House who brought impeachment must resign.
Click to expand...
Speaking of the Russia Collusion fraud, they couldn’t bring impeachment articles because Mueller couldn’t create The charges they needed.
 
LeafByNiggle said:
Was he under oath? If it was a crime to tell lies while not under oath, Trump would have been in jail many times over.
Click to expand...
Are you being serious right now? You really believe it was perfectly fine for Adam Schiff to tell the county lies because he wasn’t under oath. Lying to congress is a crime and he lied to both the House and Senate.
 
Horton said:
40.png
LeafByNiggle:
Was he under oath? If it was a crime to tell lies while not under oath, Trump would have been in jail many times over.
Click to expand...
Are you being serious right now? You really believe it was perfectly fine for Adam Schiff to tell the county lies because he wasn’t under oath. Lying to congress is a crime and he lied to both the House and Senate.
Click to expand...
If he committed a crime, why has he not been charged with a crime?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top