Tucker: Adam Schiff should resign

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cathoholic
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The number of Schiff’s witnesses who testified under oath to having essentially nothing is incredible. Doesn’t matter how much the Trump haters stamp their feet at this point: the fact of the matter is right in front of them: they still can’t get Trump gone.

Stuck with Biden this fall. What a fate. No wonder they need to keep the economy down. No wonder the goalposts have shifted regarding restarting the economy. No wonder they need cheat by mail. The clue by four to calling it that is in their resistance to keeping partisan organizations out of the ballot gathering process. If they were to agree that partisan organizations could be kept out of the ballot harvesting processes, I might give thought to supporting this myself.

Schiff shouldn’t resign. I strongly prefer to see him squirming and twisting in the wind. Red meat for the other side to campaign against. Of course his district always has the prerogative to kick him out. But like Pelosi, I doubt that will happen anytime soon.
 
At some point arguing with them is like banging your head against a brick wall.
If there is one thing for conservatives and Republicans to learn from Donald Trump, do not be quiet under criticism. Do not be silent and cede the argument to them. Confront falsehood and propaganda with truth.
 
Last edited:
Trump jr was contacted. Then he sent an email asking for a meeting. That’s solicitation under the statute.
You seem to think Clinton was out of bounds investigating her opponent. I don’t understand how this is wrong in your mind.
You don’t know that no campaign law was violated. You don’t know who individual 1 is either.
 
Trump jr was contacted. Then he sent an email asking for a meeting. That’s solicitation under the statute.
He was responding to a solicitation. A solicitation staged by his dad’s opponent.
You seem to think Clinton was out of bounds investigating her opponent. I don’t understand how this is wrong in your mind.
I didn’t say it wasn’t wrong. I said it probably wasn’t illegal. It was definitely far worse than what the Trump campaign did. Trump got zero information from that meeting. Clinton paid for a dossier full of lies, which was later used by Comey and other Obama holdovers to stage a bogus attack on the Trump administration.
You don’t know that no campaign law was violated.
You don’t know that there was. Presumption of innocence means what it means.
 
If there is one thing for conservatives and Republicans to learn from Donald Trump, do not be quiet under criticism. Do not be silent and cede the argument to them. Confront falsehood and propaganda with truth.
You are correct.
 
I wrote why Mueller said he didn’t prosecute Trump Jr.
I am sure it was wrong to a Trump voter that Clinton should raise a finger to find out why Russia was helping Trump. You rather she just roll over and concede.
It has always astounded me though that she would be accused of paying for lies. She never published it to the public before the vote. So voters had no benefit of it when voting.
That leaves this scenario.
Paid 3 million for lies.
Lies that offered zero help winning.
Therefore when she handed over the 3 million, she didn’t use that money to help win, but because she was planning on loosing. So she could get Trump after she succeeded loosing.
Yes that sounds plausible.
 
Last edited:
I wrote why Mueller said he didn’t prosecute Trump Jr.
Regardless of what he said, he had nothing. He knew that when he started his waste of money
I am sure it was wrong to a Trump voter that Clinton should raise a finger to find out why Russia was helping Trump.
You think that’s what she was doing? Trying to find out why Russia was helping Trump?
So, she hired FusionGPS to work with Steele and Russians to put together a pack of lies in a dossier in order to find out what the Russians were dong to help Trump when no collusion was actually happening?
It has always astounded me though that she would be accused of paying for lies. She never published it to the public before the vote. So voters had no benefit of it when voting.
No. She gave it to operatives in the FBI who lied to the FISA court about its origin. You think that’s better?
Paid 3 million for lies.
Lies that offered zero help winning.
One has never accused her of being a good candidate.
Paid 3 million for lies.
Lies that offered zero help winning.
Therefore when she handed over the 3 million, she didn’t use that money to help win, but because she was planning on loosing. So she could get Trump after she succeeded loosing.
Yes that sounds plausible.
That’s what happened. I’ll let you vouch for the intelligence she displayed.
.
 
I can’t tell if Trump people are serious or something else is going on. I frankly don’t want to criticize problems.
You conclude:
Hillary entered the race certain she would loose because she wasn’t a very good candidate.
The DNC spent 3 million dollars of campaign contributions for something that could not help her win.
For a FISA warrant for some obscure guy in the Trump campaign( she would have to pay today, knowing about the FISA warrant after a year later after she lost).
And the thing is this might be the most coherent Trump conspiracy between now and November.
Good lock.
 
JonNC . . .
The reasons articulated in the articles were contrived.
Exactly Jon. The “articles of impeachment” recently were a joke.
 
Zzyzx_Road . . .
Stuck with Biden this fall. What a fate. No wonder they need to keep the economy down. No wonder the goalposts have shifted regarding restarting the economy. No wonder they need cheat by mail.
Well spoken Zzyzx_Road.
 
Keep the economy down? I would ask what that means if I thought it was intended to mean something. If you focus on it , it will help you forget the pandemic.
Help you remember goal posts.
And help you remember mail is cheating
 
Maximus1 . . . .
Keep the economy down? I would ask what that means if I thought it was intended to mean something. If you focus on it , it will help you forget the pandemic.
Help you remember goal posts.
And help you remember mail is cheating
Your comment here is incoherent to me (probably my fault).

I have no idea what you’re talking about.
 
. . . .
The band is all together.
In terms of the comment above, is it hard to imagine what is objectionable about accusing people of seeking to keep the economy down? I am asking. Maybe it is and I assume to much. It assumes people are thrilled to see their own stuff dissapear. For starters.
 
Last edited:
Yep I’ve a been flagged again ,Thanks! :roll_eyes:
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top