G
gam197
Guest
Trying to understand how the NRA was stifled and what went on.
Last edited:
Do you mean, how they got caught mis-spending their funds?how the NRA was stifled
Mark Zuckerberg spend 400 million alone on this election ad I am sure other big names did such as Bezos, Google, Twitter, Apple and Netflix. all contributing to Joe Biden.gam197:![]()
Do you mean, how they got caught mis-spending their funds?how the NRA was stifled
What does that have to do with your claim that “the NRA was stifled?”Mark Zuckerberg spend 400 million alone on this election ad I am sure other big names did such as Bezos, Google, Twitter, Apple and Netflix. all contributing to Joe Biden.
go look it up if that’s what you think. the data is public.Mark Zuckerberg spend 400 million alone on this election ad I am sure other big names did such as Bezos, Google, Twitter, Apple and Netflix. all contributing to Joe Biden.
This is known as free speech, something done by the Koch brothers, Adelson and many more on the Republican side for years.Mark Zuckerberg spend 400 million alone on this election ad I am sure other big names did such as Bezos, Google, Twitter, Apple and Netflix. all contributing to Joe Biden.
I am struggling to see where the cheating is. For example, lets look at Wayne County, MI – the largest county in Michigan, where Detroit and the inner Detroit suburbs are, and one of the places that Republicans have claimed all kinds of nefarious activity took place in.To think we’d ever have a presidential election with this degree of cheating, it should anger every red-blooded American. Sickening.
| Year | Republican | Democratic | Third Parties |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 30.7% 264,149 | 68.1% 587,074 | 1.2% 10,598 |
| 2016 | 29.3% 228,993 | 66.4% 519,444 | 4.3% 34,282 |
| 2012 | 26.1% 213,814 | 72.8% 595,846 | 1.0% 8,476 |
| 2008 | 24.6% 219,582 | 74.0% 660,085 | 1.4% 12,064 |
| 2004 | 29.8% 257,750 | 69.4% 600,047 | 0.8% 6,931 |
| 2000 | 29.0% 223,021 | 69.0% 530,414 | 2.0% 15,192 |
| 1996 | 24.0% 175,886 | 69.0% 504,466 | 7.0% 51,245 |
| 1992 | 27.0% 227,002 | 60.4% 508,464 | 12.7% 106,499 |
| 1988 | 39.0% 291,996 | 60.2% 450,222 | 0.8% 5,938 |
| 1984 | 42.3% 367,391 | 57.2% 496,632 | 0.5% 4,320 |
| 1980 | 35.4% 315,532 | 58.6% 522,024 | 6.0% 53,288 |
| 1976 | 38.2% 348,588 | 60.1% 548,767 | 1.7% 15,635 |
| 1972 | 45.1% 435,877 | 53.3% 514,913 | 1.7% 16,087 |
I think we should have very strict regulations on campaign financing and political spending.Mark Zuckerberg spend 400 million alone on this election ad I am sure other big names did such as Bezos, Google, Twitter, Apple and Netflix. all contributing to Joe Biden.
I think a lot of people on both sides of the isle can agree with this. However, one could still use their money to legally influence elections without donating it to candidates. The Citizens United case had the could taking a look at this.I think we should have very strict regulations on campaign financing and political spending.
I’ll bet they say that ALL the time on the TV news.Democrat is not an adjective. Why do you call them the “Democrat Party” rather than the “Democratic Party” which is its official name?
I think instead of the state winner getting all the electoral votes, it should be done by congressional district or some other apportionment method.Definitely time to introduce the “ popular vote decides ” concept.