Turkey 'downs Russian warplane on Syria border' - BBC

  • Thread starter Thread starter Path_Finder
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
We don’t know where the plane was exactly. According to Turkey it was.on their airspace.And They said they warned Russia several times not to.fly on their airspace. Russia it is saying it was.on.Syrian.airspace but exactly as you say that there is no evidence that it was on Turkey what is the evidence that it was on Syrian airspace? Putin saying so? That is not evidence.

As.said before Russia and Turkey have a long history of problems and.it may be completely unrelated to ISIS
There is a map somewhere, in the thread. It shows the Russian jet flying up over Syria and then turning back to Syria but overlapping Turkish airspace, for 15 seconds. The jet was shot down by Turkey, a kilometre away from Turkey, whilst in Syria - all for 15 secs airspace violation, when Russia was killing off their ‘joint’ foe.
 
Turkey’s concerns are probably the following in order of importance:
  1. Iranian imperialist ambitions.
  2. Kurdish separatism
  3. Russian imperialist ambitions.
  4. ISIS.
Turkey is an Islamic state that used to be a secular state. Turkey undoubtedly knows how weak ISIS is as a potential adversary, and doesn’t find its Islamism all that offensive.

Turkey probably figures the Iran/Russian axis is far more dangerous to Turkey than ISIS is. And it’s probably true.

Not that I’m an admirer of Turkey. Far from it.
Agree. Probably.for.Turkey.ISiS is.seen.As.something.that they can.get rid.of.quickly if.there.is ever a need too. Russia.on the other is a.big problem.and.added to.their long history,.it is.more.important to.keep.them.out.
 
There is a map somewhere, in the thread. It shows the Russian jet flying up over Syria and then turning back to Syria but overlapping Turkish airspace, for 15 seconds. The jet was shot down by Turkey, a kilometre away from Turkey, whilst in Syria - all for 15 secs airspace violation, when Russia was killing off their ‘joint’ foe.
Military aircraft’s are not allowed anywhere in the world on another country’s airspace without previous authorization. I can assure you that if any military aircraft fliesover US airspace for two seconds, the US will.shoot it without even warning. Turkey did warn Russia that they were entering their space without authorization and Russia ignored it. Why did Russia didn’t ask for the required permission as every existing country in the world does? Again this is completely unrelated to ISIS. Under Turkey’s eyes it is an eternal enemy who is an actual threat for them who is trying to impose their imperialism on them. Nothing to do with iSIs
 
Nothing you have said provides any adequate explanation as to why Russia, which is supposed to have entered a temporary alliance of interest with NATO to confront ISIS after the downing of the plane and the Paris massacre, is flying sorties over NATO’s southern flank and infringing on a member state’s airspace to bomb a region where there are no known ISIL affiliates but which is known to be peopled by ethnic Turks.

This rash action is highly suspicious, apart from anything else, if Russia’s number one objective in the Syrian conflict is now to crush ISIS - which of course, it isn’t - just as Turkey’s overriding interest in the war isn’t either.

Russia seems to have made an ill-fated decision to put the national interest it has invested in the Assad regime over its promise to prioritise ISIS after the downing of the airliner, by bombing non-ISIL targets off NATO’s southern flank, rather focusing all of its energies on the fight against the Islamic State.
Says who - that information only came out late this afternoon, by the MSM. It must have been all they could ‘think-tank’ up in at such short notice, to back Turkey and keep their respective ‘readers’ anti-Russian, as per usual.

There was no mention of it, before today.

The flight plan showed the jet come through the centre of Syria and was flying back into Syria, maybe they were looking at what was going on, to see how much ground was being won over - who knows.🤷 How they identify whose, who is totally beyond me i.e. Turkish rebels, from moderate rebels from ISIS - but possibly they have a way…

*if Russia’s number one objective in the Syrian conflict is now to crush ISIS - which of course, it isn’t
*
Again says who - the MSM.

Russia asked them all, at the UN, in September, to join them in a coalition to hit ISIS. You think if they’d agreed then, that Russia would be off hitting anyone but ISIS whilst the other countries were hitting ISIS - I’m sure that would have worked out really well, for all concerned.
 
Says who - that information only came out late this afternoon, by the MSM. It must have been all they could ‘think-tank’ up in at such short notice, to back Turkey and keep their respective ‘readers’ anti-Russian, as per usual.

There was no mention of it, before today.

The flight plan showed the jet come through the centre of Syria and was flying back into Syria, maybe they were looking at what was going on, to see how much ground was being won over - who knows.🤷 How they identify whose, who is totally beyond me i.e. Turkish rebels, from moderate rebels from ISIS - but possibly they have a way…

*if Russia’s number one objective in the Syrian conflict is now to crush ISIS - which of course, it isn’t *

Again says who - the MSM.

Russia asked them all, at the UN, in September, to join them in a coalition to hit ISIS. You think if they’d agreed then, that Russia would be off hitting anyone but ISIS whilst the other countries were hitting ISIS - I’m sure that would have worked out really well, for all concerned.
This is not a recent development dreamed up by any MSM as you claim.

Turkey warned the Kremlin that it was concerned by Russian sorties over this region last Thursday, because it is peopled by about 100,000 ethnic Turks whom Ankara has sworn to protect during the civil war.

Russia, for a reason not known to me, ignored Turkey’s warning and has apparently suffered the consequences.
 
Military aircraft’s are not allowed anywhere in the world on another country’s airspace without previous authorization. I can assure you that if any military aircraft fliesover US airspace for two seconds, the US will.shoot it without even warning. Turkey did warn Russia that they were entering their space without authorization and Russia ignored it. Why did Russia didn’t ask for the required permission as every existing country in the world does? Again this is completely unrelated to ISIS. Under Turkey’s eyes it is an eternal enemy who is an actual threat for them who is trying to impose their imperialism on them. Nothing to do with iSIs
Why did Russia inadvertently fly over their airspace? Did Turkey know it may have been likely that they could have done, most probably, in error, because Turkey knew Russia was fighting a ‘common’ enemy right on Turkey’s doorstep? If Turkey was really worried about ISIS they would welcome Russia with open arms, to help, even if it meant a 15 second violation of their airspace.

Let’s hope Assad doesn’t implement the same rules, as he would be perfectly legal to do so and blow up every Western plane that flies over Syria aside from the French - and I wonder would anyone complain about that, or would the goalposts move. :rolleyes:

Many countries turn a blind eye to airspace violations, but when the plane in question is fighting a ‘common’, (or maybe not so common) enemy- and they shoot them down - it’s totally and utterly, unbelievable. Russia flew jets over Irish airspace a year or so ago, we didn’t care, the UK had to give off to Ireland for not ‘giving off’ to Russia. 🤷

There’s a time and place to implement a bit of ‘common sense’ and ‘cop-on’ in any situation, with rules in place - especially during a terrorist war.
 
Why did Russia inadvertently fly over their airspace? Did Turkey know it may have been likely that they could have done, most probably, in error, because Turkey knew Russia was fighting a ‘common’ enemy right on Turkey’s doorstep? If Turkey was really worried about ISIS they would welcome Russia with open arms, to help, even if it meant a 15 second violation of their airspace.
Funny that, I wasn’t aware ethnic Turkish rebels over the border from Turkey in Syria were the “common enemy” of Erdogan and Putin :rolleyes:
 
Why did Russia inadvertently fly over their airspace? Did Turkey know it may have been likely that they could have done, most probably, in error, because Turkey knew Russia was fighting a ‘common’ enemy right on Turkey’s doorstep? If Turkey was really worried about ISIS they would welcome Russia with open arms, to help, even if it meant a 15 second violation of their airspace.

Let’s hope Assad doesn’t implement the same rules, as he would be perfectly legal to do so and blow up every Western plane that flies over Syria aside from the French - and I wonder would anyone complain about that, or would the goalposts move. :rolleyes:

Many countries turn a blind eye to airspace violations, but when the plane in question is fighting a ‘common’, (or maybe not so common) enemy- and they shoot them down - it’s totally and utterly, unbelievable. Russia flew jets over Irish airspace a year or so ago, we didn’t care, the UK had to give off to Ireland for not ‘giving off’ to Russia. 🤷

There’s a time and place to implement a bit of ‘common sense’ and ‘cop-on’ in any situation, with rules in place - especially during a terrorist war.
Because no.country in the world “inadvertently” flies military aircraft without permission. Little.less Russia and even less.after being warned. Russia knew what they were doing. They probably did not want to ask permission because they are Russia and they feel.they can do whatever they want.and step over the entire world. Many countries do turn.a.blind.eye to violations of.commercial or private aircraft’s but no country turns a blind eye to military aircraft because unauthorized military aircrafts usually do this with belief intentions.

Again for Turkey ISIS is not a mayor enemy. The mayor enemy is Russia. Turkey probably feels that if ISiS actually becomes a real threat to them they can blow them away quickly. That is not.the case with Russia. For Turkey the enemy is and has always been Russia.
 
Why did Russia inadvertently fly over their airspace? Did Turkey know it may have been likely that they could have done, most probably, in error, because Turkey knew Russia was fighting a ‘common’ enemy right on Turkey’s doorstep?
How do you know it was inadvertent and “most probably, in error”? In a earlier post I linked to an article that said Russia was warned on October 5 about violating Turkish airspace. Russia has had almost 3 weeks to figure out where the border between Syria and Turkey is (like they did not already know). You would think that if you had been threatened that something like this could happen you would make sure to stay out of Turkish airspace.
 
There are parts of the map that show what groups control what but to say Russia was going after ISIS in a place ISIS is not would be embarrassing to even say. I think that iws what rubs some people the wrong way and then, continue to insist as if one has the truth.

bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-22798391 Last summer’s article so yes, the maps are fluid.

Turkish enemies, I’d say it’s:

Kurds
Iran
Syria under Assad and so on.
Russia, perhaps so but it is complex over there,

ISIS fighters surely have travelled through Turkey, the whole situation is complex, Turkey designated Al Nusra terrorist but they might have at one time helped them, perhaps the US and even Israel may have “helped them” if it means provide intelligence,

The old dictum, the enemy of my enemy is really in force over there and those countries are really so close to each other.
 
Why did Russia inadvertently fly over their airspace? .
Why do you presume that it was inadvertent?

Russian fighters have GPS. They were warned as they approached.

Just like their bombers do when they invaded Irish airspace last March.
.
irishexaminer.com/ireland/passenger-planes-dodged-russian-bombers-315623.html

Russians have done that for decades, it is how they see what the response is going to be.

Well, either that, or they were really desperate to get some good RTÉ reception :rolleyes:
 
How do you know it was inadvertent and “most probably, in error”? In a earlier post I linked to an article that said Russia was warned on October 5 about violating Turkish airspace. Russia has had almost 3 weeks to figure out where the border between Syria and Turkey is (like they did not already know). You would think that if you had been threatened that something like this could happen you would make sure to stay out of Turkish airspace.
If the Turks can’t see the difference between a jet, fighting a mutual war against terrorism, that flies slightly over their border, for 15 secs, and then assume that the Russians were doing it ‘on purpose’ - I assume to annoy the Turks, then so be it.

Turkey followed the international rules to the letter, and no quarter given. Good for them. 👍 Such heroes.

Maybe if Assad/Greece do the same to Turkish and/or other countries’ aircraft, the laws won’t look as palatable.
 
Why do you presume that it was inadvertent?

Russian fighters have GPS. They were warned as they approached.

Just like their bombers do when they invaded Irish airspace last March.
.
irishexaminer.com/ireland/passenger-planes-dodged-russian-bombers-315623.html

Russians have done that for decades, it is how they see what the response is going to be.

Well, either that, or they were really desperate to get some good RTÉ reception :rolleyes:
Exactly, needless to say, we didn’t shoot them out of the sky. 🙂

There were some good cartoons made, regarding the incident.

newstalk.com/This-cartoon-offers-a-very-Irish-response-to-Russian-bombers-in-Irish-airspace

But IF there were international terrorists say fighting, in England. Russia was helping out and flew over Irish airspace, at some point, to return back to England to fight - then Ireland are going to shoot down the Russian jet for doing so? :eek:

I mean, it’s just common decency, if nothing else. What Turkey did was insane at best, and unconscionable at worst.
 
Exactly, needless to say, we didn’t shoot them out of the sky. 🙂

There were some good cartoons made, regarding the incident.

newstalk.com/This-cartoon-offers-a-very-Irish-response-to-Russian-bombers-in-Irish-airspace

But IF there were international terrorists say fighting, in England. Russia was helping out and flew over Irish airspace, at some point, to return back to England to fight - then Ireland are going to shoot down the Russian jet for doing so? :eek:

I mean, it’s just common decency, if nothing else. What Turkey did was insane at best, and unconscionable at worst.
It’s certainly not a friendly gesture. But then neither is refusing to leave a rival’s airspace. What I wonder is when incidents like this happen, how much of the decision-making and risk-taking belongs to the pilots and how much to higher up the authority chain?
 
I think the path was accidental, here’s one map of what ‘Turkey’ said occurred, hence the Russian jet had flown over Syria and was turning back in.
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/11/24/14/2EC4CF9000000578-3331558-image-a-68_1448374223214.jpg
Has anyone looked at the scale on this map and the odd protrusion of the border of Turkey into Syria?
The distance across can’t be more that ~two miles, so I’m inclined to agree with PepiPop that the Russian plane couldn’t have taken more about 15 seconds to cross it.

However, here’s my 2 cents:
when a warning is given, isn’t the warning to leave the air space?
In order to leave would it have taken longer to turn around or to just exist the other side of the protrusion?

Please look at the map …
in my opinion the Russians can argue that their pilot did heed the warning and was leaving via the other side of the protrusion …
same or even less time to leave imho.

If Putin explodes over this …
just hope we stay out of it. 😦

rex
 
As president Obama said today, Russia and Iran are not fighting ISIS as much as they are fighting to prop up the Assad regime. Turkey knows this and Turkey doesn’t like the Assad regime so Russia should have expected something like this to happen if they crossed the border with Turkey.

Syria is a real mess right now.
 
It’s certainly not a friendly gesture. But then neither is refusing to leave a rival’s airspace. What I wonder is when incidents like this happen, how much of the decision-making and risk-taking belongs to the pilots and how much to higher up the authority chain?
17 seconds worth off decision making. 🤷

I know nothing about jet flying, but by the map they seemed to fly over a small section of Turkish airspace that loops outward, into Syria, otherwise they’d have remained, in Syria, throughout all of their flight. Possibly, they’d forgotten about this loop, and assumed a smooth border, or maybe they didn’t expect a country fighting the exact same enemy, would to be too annoyed, if they took a 17 second, easier fly route… 🤷

Either way, I doubt in a trillion years they did it ‘on purpose’. I’d say they had a lot more on their minds than going over a small loop of Turkish airspace.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CUlkjzcWEAEOYPt.png
 
Pepipop seems to be correct inasmuch as we are talking about a fairly small strip of land, far as I can tell.

Nevertheless, there are three overriding issues that need answers:
  1. We are not speaking about one incursion lasting 17 seconds but multiple incursions around the same area, with warnings being given and apparently not heeded
  2. This is not the first time Russia has infringed Turkish airspace and bombed rebel Turkmen. Ankara has complained repeatedly to the Kremlin regarding this. Turkey has therefore responded to a concerning and entirely illegal “pattern”, not a freak event. This makes me wonder how one can construe this as a mere error of judgement.
  3. Yesterday, a Russian submarine entered British waters off-the-coast of Scotland, just days after the RAF intercepted Russian aircraft in UK airspace:
news.sky.com/story/1592479/allied-aircraft-hunt-russian-sub-off-scotland


**Allied’ Aircraft Hunt Russian Sub Off Scotland
Aircraft based at an RAF base are conducting “activity” off Scotland in response to reports a Russian submarine has been seen nearby, the Ministry of Defence has confirmed.
It is understood that a Royal Navy frigate and a submarine are also involved in the hunt.
It comes days after RAF Typhoons were forced to intercept Russian Tu-160 Blackjack aircraft that strayed into the vicinity of UK airspace.**
The Sun on Sunday reported that a French patrol aircraft was carrying out the search as the UK no longer has any specialist sub-hunting aircraft.
Britain scrapped the RAF’s Nimrods with search capability in 2010 after the Strategic Defence Services Review.
It is apparent that Russia, at a time when it is supposed to be cooperating with the West against the common global threat posed by ISIL, is in fact testing the resolve of NATO from every angle through repeated incursions into the sovereign waters and airspace of member states.
 
Has anyone looked at the scale on this map and the odd protrusion of the border of Turkey into Syria?
The distance across can’t be more that ~two miles, so I’m inclined to agree with PepiPop that the Russian plane couldn’t have taken more about 15 seconds to cross it.

However, here’s my 2 cents:
when a warning is given, isn’t the warning to leave the air space?
In order to leave would it have taken longer to turn around or to just exist the other side of the protrusion?

Please look at the map …
in my opinion the Russians can argue that their pilot did heed the warning and was leaving via the other side of the protrusion …
same or even less time to leave imho.

If Putin explodes over this …
just hope we stay out of it. 😦

rex
I’d say Putin will box clever with this, although he must be absolutely fuming.

It’s against any level of human decency - aside from the ‘airspace’ laws and regs - that they would shoot down a jet for that reason, especially when taking the current Syrian situ into account. Here’s Turkey’s letter to the UN security council, which states it was for 17 seconds. One plane ‘escaped’ and the other was shot down a kilometre away, in Syria, i.e. they were out of the Turkish airspace when they were hit.

twitter.com/wikileaks/status/669188253279473664

(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)
 
Read:

theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/nov/24/russia-proof-jet-syrian-airspace-turkey
**The robust Turkish response to airspace violations will have come as no surprise whatsoever, especially after the precursor to this incident on 3 and 4 October, when Russian aircraft received similar warnings **but removed themselves before being attacked. So Russia was fully aware of the rules by which Turkey is playing, and they are rules which Russia understands. Turkey’s habit of firm responses creates clear and unequivocal red lines and limits on what kind of behaviour by Russia is acceptable.
It may therefore be clear to others in Moscow that the tragic death of the air crew involved is likely to have been the result of their own error or a miscalculation by their commanders, and it is in the interests of neither side to escalate the situation. In October, the Turkish response when it came to involving Nato was very measured; the deliberate approach to calling for consultations under article 4 rather than article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty was a political message. Despite Putin’s claims – apparently untrue – that Turkey raised the issue with Nato before talking to Russia, limiting the problem to a bilateral issue will be important for preventing uncontrolled and unnecessary escalation.
In any case, Russia will continue to deny that its aircraft entered Turkish airspace at all. But here, Moscow has a serious and self-inflicted problem. It may claim that it has “objective data proving that its aircraft never left Syrian airspace”. **But after 18 months of misinformation, lies and outright fantasy peddled by Russia over its involvement in Ukraine – and in particular over the shooting down of Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 – this will be of little value. Put simply, thanks to Russia’s previous actions, even if its spokesmen do in fact tell the truth, its “proof” will have no credibility whatsoever. **
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top