Two women accused Herman Cain of inappropriate behavior

  • Thread starter Thread starter gilliam
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Pirate_Talker said:
Did you notice how she used Possessive pronouns? “Ours” are better the “theirs”? It seemed demeaning to me.
Click to expand...
Yeah, like my racehorse runs faster than yours or my yacht sails smoother… I have only just recovered control of my heaving stomach. Can anybody be really that derisive of others - even on purpose? :confused:
 
EmperorNapoleon said:
Before or after these women signed settlements with suppression clauses?

Suppression clause.

The Republicans savagely went after Clinton for having a consensual relationship and theres a big difference between a consensual relationship and verbally or physically molesting someone. The media is, naturally, interested in the more sinister of the two.
Click to expand...
Mr. Clinton was governor of Arkansas. Paula Jones was an employee of the State of Arkansas. He propositioned her and exposed himself to her.

Yet even Gloria Steinham did not think those actions = sexual harassment.
:confused:
The reason why he was impeached is because he lied about his relationshop with Lewinski, not that he had a relationshp with Lewinski.

I think there’s a difference between exposing ones self and making a hand gesture.
 
_Abyssinia said:
I have no idea if it got leaked by any of the GOP campaigns, who knows, maybe it got leaked by Obama’s campaign.
Click to expand...
Why waste the ammo now? Wouldn’t it be better to hold on to it and then drop it next October?

I beat one of the other camps released it test Cain. To see if a.) he can be knocked out or b.) to see if Cain can take the heat?
 
Cain is not presidential material. I fear the republicans are pushing him because they somehow think a black candidate stands a better shot than a white one. If Cain, like Obama, was white, they wouldn’t have had any chance. Alan Keyes was by far the best candidate ever who happened to have dark pigmentation.
 
Pork_Roll said:
Cain is not presidential material. I fear the republicans are pushing him because they somehow think a black candidate stands a better shot than a white one. If Cain, like Obama, was white, they wouldn’t have had any chance. Alan Keyes was by far the best candidate ever who happened to have dark pigmentation.
Click to expand...
Ua, but he sounds like Kermit the Frog when he speaks.
 
Pork_Roll said:
Cain is not presidential material. I fear the republicans are pushing him because they somehow think a black candidate stands a better shot than a white one. If Cain, like Obama, was white, they wouldn’t have had any chance. Alan Keyes was by far the best candidate ever who happened to have dark pigmentation.
Click to expand...
Not the race card. :rolleyes:
 
beckers said:
Why waste the ammo now? Wouldn’t it be better to hold on to it and then drop it next October?

I beat one of the other camps released it test Cain. To see if a.) he can be knocked out or b.) to see if Cain can take the heat?
Click to expand...
I actually think this could benefit Cain if no more allegations come out. He has got more media attention than he ever has, that means the problem with name recognition is sorted out.
 
Well. as I was saying earlier in this thread, one of the ladys will be National Televison today. Not sure when or where, but my wife was just telling me she heard it on the Good Morning America show.

She was also saying Cain apparently either doesn’t have a clue of what went on, or has been telling a lie about the sum paid to the women also. We’ll see as time unfolds.
 
_Abyssinia said:
Not this boring flip flop accusation again. Name a candidate who has not changed their position on an issue, democrat or republican. People get new information, they change their position.
Click to expand...
Depends on the issue. If it regards committing troops to war, I prefer leaders to base their position on the most current and relevant data. With regards to social issues, most of it is based on time tested moral principles that don’t change. I don’t see any “new information” that would have a politician go from being pro-life to pro-abortion. The data supports the pro-life position. Just sayin’…There are some things that if a politician/candidate flip-flops on, it can be devastating.
 
EmperorNapoleon said:
Before or after these women signed settlements with suppression clauses?

Suppression clause.
.
Click to expand...
If the women had a civil case they would never have signed the agreement. The contract does not apply to any criminal case - it would not be enforceable.
EmperorNapoleon said:
The Republicans savagely went after Clinton for having a consensual relationship and theres a big difference between a consensual relationship and verbally or physically molesting someone. The media is, naturally, interested in the more sinister of the two.
Click to expand...
Actually charges were brought up against Clinton by the Justice Department that was headed up by his own appointee. I always felt that Bill and Hillary should have been brought on charges for lying under oath, the same charges that netted Scooter Libby a 30 month prison sentence. Except in this case they had undeniable physical evidence of his crime.
 
One of the woman received a years severance pay, she’s legally bound and can’t talk. From what GMA stated the other is a Show-Girl ‘whatever’ that means and is coming foward today.

GMA is OK, but its a bunch of gossip also IMHO. I don’t think it was hugh secret the “dirty laundry” was gonna come out though. 🤷
 
seekerz said:
Unfortunately, CAF is hardly the only place. I just listened to some comments Ann Coulter made and it seems like this presidential race could turn into a big pi_ _ ing contest to see whose “blacks” are “better”…(Excuse me while I fight off the waves of nausea with some deep breaths and thoughts of how long ago the Civil War was)… My personal opinion is that a ‘beat Obama with a black candidate’ strategy might produce some very interesting evenings in front of the TV in 2012…that is, if Romney allows it.
Click to expand...
Quite often I’ve seen here numerous posters who one would consider liberal slyly accuse those who do not support Obama as racist. Numerous times. They have cute little expressions to make such accusations without using the word itself. Things like ‘if it walks like a duck…’

It’s obvious. Anyone that denies it is a hypocrite.
 
Well I’ll tell you this, I could care less what color or ethnic background you are. Those sound like “personal problems” to me. Most of don’t live in that realm, and choose to “ignore” those who do preach hate. Only problem I have in the USA is with those who become Pro-Washington, instead of Pro-America. To promote their own personal agenda.

And and if you want to get right down to it Obama is Black and White.🤷 So which half is the issue???
 
seekerz said:
Unfortunately, CAF is hardly the only place. I just listened to some comments Ann Coulter made and it seems like this presidential race could turn into a big pi_ _ ing contest to see whose “blacks” are “better”…(Excuse me while I fight off the waves of nausea with some deep breaths and thoughts of how long ago the Civil War was)… My personal opinion is that a ‘beat Obama with a black candidate’ strategy might produce some very interesting evenings in front of the TV in 2012…that is, if Romney allows it.
Click to expand...
To be fair Ann Coulter is a blogger. Do I need to remind you how many Democrat Senators, Congressmen or Vice-Presidents have trotted out the race card over the last several years?
 
Scott_Lafrance said:
Other than being an enormous embarrassment to the Catholic Church?
Click to expand...
‘Enormous’ is such a relative term and ‘embarrassment’, well let’s just say the Church has had its share of those. I seem to recall some "embarrassments’ who matured to sainthood. So don’t knock the concept of human imperfection - it can take you pretty far.
 
Pork_Roll said:
Cain is not presidential material. I fear the republicans are pushing him because they somehow think a black candidate stands a better shot than a white one. If Cain, like Obama, was white, they wouldn’t have had any chance. Alan Keyes was by far the best candidate ever who happened to have dark pigmentation.
Click to expand...
Your started out making some great points but I have to disagree with you about Obama (he and Cain are separated by several degrees, including overt commitment to the idea of being POTUS) and by the time you get to Keyes and his history of birtherism…sorry, they are both out of Obama’s league intellectually in my opinion and I cannot see either answering that 2 am call better than he has. Cain seems to have zero grasp of international affairs (and I don’t just mean knowledge of state capitals, but how things work in the world beyond our doorstep) and a not much better knowledge of macroeconomics. Keyes pulled a Lou Dobbs on us, so whatever he had to offer intellectually is open to question now. That being said, there have been worse candidates for president than either of these three gentlemen, so the idea of pigmentation being what sets any of them apart, is somewhat dubious.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top