E
Elizabeth502
Guest
In an effort to be constructive, and to slow down the spiraling Blame Game, I’d like to reference an earlier article that appeared in the NYT about this phenomenon. It’s too long for forum rules to quote in its entirety, but the gist of it has very much to do with pervasive cultural differences north and south of the border. The Latin American Catholic Church is a very different experience than the U.S. Catholic Church; we are much more Anglo-oriented, culturally, with a more “European” (reserved, formal) character to our liturgies and even our spirituality.
nytimes.com/1989/05/14/us/switch-by-hispanic-catholics-changes-face-of-us-religion.html
The Church has always been multi-cultural. This is nothing new. Here are some observations from the article I linked:
~different sizes of congregations
~style of ministry (more layered, less intimate, & more intellectual north of border)
~differences in spirituality (integration of folklore into Latin Catholicism; emotional flavor of belief & worship)
The article adds the factor of reduction in vocations after immigration, thus affecting the sense of connectedness & identity.
I will add myself that, having attended liturgies north and south of the border, none of my Anglo peers find the Latin approach appealing or authentic. I’m talking about practice of liturgy, not necessarily what the belief is. To have made such a production and drama out of Good Friday and to have virtually ignored Easter Sunday is not something that washes well in a traditional Roman Catholic Church of European influence. I’m not saying that the Resurrection is not valued and understood, but the relative insignificance of the Easter celebration versus Good Friday was just one of many contrasts that have stood out to me as incompatible with traditional Catholicism as practiced in the U.S.
It is also true that Hispanic priests south of the border resemble in role much more what Irish priests in this country used to enjoy: much more of a connection with families than is true currently north of the border, with priests knowing individual families quite well, being invited into the home regularly, even celebrating baptisms within the home, etc.
cont’d next…
nytimes.com/1989/05/14/us/switch-by-hispanic-catholics-changes-face-of-us-religion.html
The Church has always been multi-cultural. This is nothing new. Here are some observations from the article I linked:
Although Catholicism has long been an important part of a Hispanic cultural and ethnic identity, Father Elizondo said this bond is sometimes broken by a person’s immigration to the United States, because the Catholicism here is so different from that left behind. Belief in miraculous healing, for instance, is common in Latin American Catholicism, but here it is much easier to find in Pentecostal churches than in Catholic ones…
Father Diaz noted that documents from the Vatican and the American Catholic hierarchy at various levels have identified weaknesses that leave the church open to defections. Some are structural, such as the big parish, the cornerstone of American Catholicism, which is more impersonal and less hospitable than small evangelical Protestant congregations that emphasize direct contact between ministers and their flocks.
So here we have a first set of obstacles:Other weaknesses are pastoral, the documents say, like the failure to match the simple and direct spiritual message of evangelical preachers.
~different sizes of congregations
~style of ministry (more layered, less intimate, & more intellectual north of border)
~differences in spirituality (integration of folklore into Latin Catholicism; emotional flavor of belief & worship)
The article adds the factor of reduction in vocations after immigration, thus affecting the sense of connectedness & identity.
I will add myself that, having attended liturgies north and south of the border, none of my Anglo peers find the Latin approach appealing or authentic. I’m talking about practice of liturgy, not necessarily what the belief is. To have made such a production and drama out of Good Friday and to have virtually ignored Easter Sunday is not something that washes well in a traditional Roman Catholic Church of European influence. I’m not saying that the Resurrection is not valued and understood, but the relative insignificance of the Easter celebration versus Good Friday was just one of many contrasts that have stood out to me as incompatible with traditional Catholicism as practiced in the U.S.
It is also true that Hispanic priests south of the border resemble in role much more what Irish priests in this country used to enjoy: much more of a connection with families than is true currently north of the border, with priests knowing individual families quite well, being invited into the home regularly, even celebrating baptisms within the home, etc.
cont’d next…