J
josie_L
Guest
:clapping:It amazes me how sometimes people think everything another people does is somehow the consequence of the designs of some other nation, particularly the U.S. Seems to me that demeans, in this case, the Ukrainians themselves, who are perfectly capable of having their own reasons not to want to be dominated or ruled by Russia.
There are people living today in Ukraine (the overwhelming majority of actual Ukrainians) whose parents or grandparents lived through the “Terror Famine”, the deportations and the other genocidal horrors visited on them by the Russians. After all, if they welcomed the Germans with bread and salt because of all they had suffered at the hands of Russia, and if fifty-mile-long trains of Ukrainians followed the retreating German armies out of Ukraine ahead of the Soviets, how could a people forget the genocide that impelled them to reject so vehemently domination by Russia?
If, indeed, some western operatives encouraged that revulsion, it does not mean the revulsion was somehow artificial, any more than the present concerns of the Balts and Poles about Russian revanchism is artificial. And what, after all, were westerners supposed to encourage Ukrainians to do, bow their necks to Russia’s pleasure again?
To assume that Ukrainians are incapable of knowing their own minds about Russian domination, and only reject it because westerners say they should, one has to further assume that somehow westerners have persuaded Tatars and Ukrainians to flee their homes in Crimea as they are now doing; that westerners have persuaded Catholic leaders to protest their concerns about threats to their people and their faith.
It doesn’t really work. It’s time to acknowledge that Ukrainians really don’t want to be dominated by Russia; that Russia intends to dominate or outright annex them, and that Russian aggression should be opposed by whatever means the west and those directly threatened can muster short of inviting the kind of retribution Russia has visited on people like the Chechens.