W
Woodyl57
Guest
Adam Schiff let a priest near him you think? Lol
Just kidding. All in fun.
Just kidding. All in fun.
- Status
D
Dr_Meinheimer
Guest
Meh. That’s like saying the best revenge is living well. Wholly unsatisfying, and you know it.
D
Dr_Meinheimer
Guest
This much is true.
W
Woodyl57
Guest
I love this. Good to laugh with all the banter. I will be using this one. Lol
Thanks
D
dvdjs
Guest
Huh? …
W
Woodyl57
Guest
Oh come on! That’s a good one. Tell me you get that!
D
dvdjs
Guest
Sorry, no. …
W
Woodyl57
Guest
He is making a joke that the old saying the best revenge is life well lived sounds good but really is BS. My kind of joke I guess. Nothing political, just a jest.
D
dvdjs
Guest
Not well-versed in revenge, but OK. On the other hand, the accountability of office holder before their constituents is not just a consolation, it influences the behavior of the office holders.
Last edited:
H
HarryStotle
Guest
That is a new one on me.
Was there ever a finding from Mueller’s indictment that legally stuck?
My understanding is that the servers were never actually examined by the FBI, but by a private Ukrainian based company [Company 1] called Crowdstrike. (Remember them from the Trump phone transcript to the Ukrainian president?)
FBI never examined hacked DNC servers itself: report
The FBI never examined the Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) computer servers during its investigation into Russian attempts to interfere in the presidential election, BuzzFeed reports.“The DNC…
thehill.com
W
Woodyl57
Guest
I just liked to reference to that old saying. All I was commenting on.
C
Cathoholic
Guest
Maximus1 (bold mine) . . . .
(that’s always a “plus” for energy companys looking for wise company policy-making all-star . . . not),
AND fork over EIGHTY THOUSAND DOLLARS a MONTH.
Not 80K a YEAR.
80K a MONTH!
Which if you’ve ever served on any boards,
you know 80K might just be the beginning.
Many of these positions offer travel expenses, generous per deims for food, lodging, etc. and other perks (business golf outings, free parking, car rental, welcoming of “significant others”, etc.).
Yeah. I wouldn’t participate either if I was attempting to pretend there is nothing to Hunter’s hiring.
Add to that Joe’s public brag gaffe (at a European CFR meeting if I recall correctly – which was almost certainly ALSO underwritten – probably ultimately by people like you and me are financing at least a portion of this type of thing),
and I definitely would not participate either.
Look Maximus1.
When businesses in bed with Governments do this sort of thing, everybody loses.
And you defending this, basically hits YOURSELF!
Don’t fall for it. Ideas like this, are self-destructive.
I wouldn’t participate either if I had to defend a guy not only with no experience, but a guy who has a colossial history of bad decision-making
(that’s always a “plus” for energy companys looking for wise company policy-making all-star . . . not),
AND fork over EIGHTY THOUSAND DOLLARS a MONTH.
Not 80K a YEAR.
80K a MONTH!
Which if you’ve ever served on any boards,
you know 80K might just be the beginning.
Many of these positions offer travel expenses, generous per deims for food, lodging, etc. and other perks (business golf outings, free parking, car rental, welcoming of “significant others”, etc.).
Yeah. I wouldn’t participate either if I was attempting to pretend there is nothing to Hunter’s hiring.
Add to that Joe’s public brag gaffe (at a European CFR meeting if I recall correctly – which was almost certainly ALSO underwritten – probably ultimately by people like you and me are financing at least a portion of this type of thing),
and I definitely would not participate either.
Look Maximus1.
When businesses in bed with Governments do this sort of thing, everybody loses.
And you defending this, basically hits YOURSELF!
Don’t fall for it. Ideas like this, are self-destructive.
Last edited:
H
HarryStotle
Guest
Therein lies the difference between Barr and Schiff. Barr understands the law and follows it to a T, making sure to cover everything in great detail so that when it comes out in the open the case will be bullet proof.
Schiff tries with every trick in his political book to hide behind closed doors until he is forced by circumstance to reveal what he has. When it all turns out to be one big deception he attempts to create another deception to cover for the first one. The one thing he does have is cover from the MSM who will do virtually everything in their power to shill for Schiff.
Barr understands that the MSM media will do everything they can to discredit what he does to a misinformed public so he will have to present an ironclad but clear as day case to the masses. It should be great fun getting to the bottom of all of this.
W
Woodyl57
Guest
They may cover travel, but I understand one place Hunter never traveled to was Ukraine. 80K a month and he got to work from home. I need to talk to my boss…
C
Cathoholic
Guest
Good point!
It will be interesting to see WHERE their board meetings were when this all comes out.
The Canary Islands? Monaco? Davos? Maui? (All or some of the above? . . . Depending upon which “meeting”.)
Who knows?
Doubtful they ride “coach”.
Maybe doubtful they even ride “commercial”. (Private jet travel is probably the norm for this type of thing, but I could be wrong here.)
Last edited:
C
Cathoholic
Guest
I’ve been seeing YouTube take down more Fox videos (probably innocent enough and initiated by Fox itself).
So I wanted to re-post my video WITH the title in case you want to search for it and (maybe) find it elsewhere to watch after you come here and the YouTube post has disappered.
(As I see has happened to a couple of my Fox video posts here from Youtube, in the last week or so.)
Tulsi Gabbard: This is what's so dangerous about Hillary Clinton - YouTube
If this video also disappers, you MIGHT be able to find it over at bitchute.com re-posted by someone.
(I don’t think Google has bought out Bitchute . . . Yet.)
Maybe not, but perhaps you can find it (with me including the title to the video).
So I wanted to re-post my video WITH the title in case you want to search for it and (maybe) find it elsewhere to watch after you come here and the YouTube post has disappered.
(As I see has happened to a couple of my Fox video posts here from Youtube, in the last week or so.)
Tulsi Gabbard: This is what's so dangerous about Hillary Clinton - YouTube
If this video also disappers, you MIGHT be able to find it over at bitchute.com re-posted by someone.
(I don’t think Google has bought out Bitchute . . . Yet.)
Maybe not, but perhaps you can find it (with me including the title to the video).
Last edited:
7
7_Sorrows
Guest
What will they come up with next?Maximus1:
They presumed it was. Taylor admits he never actually spoke to Trump. He got his supposition from Sondland, who said almost verbatim. “I am presuming this is conditional”, more or less. They can’t admit anything, since they had no actual knowledge, so either you are making this up as you go, or are posting in ignorance. Might as well claim the posters on this board admitted it too, since it is worth just as much. We have nothing to admit either.
So we have a guy basing his opinion off of another man’s opinion, without ANY actual instructions from the President to make this a quid pro quo? What a joke this all is. From now on, we can impeach by claiming “he must have meant this, because I think meant this!”
None of it matters anyway. The sooner this is over, the sooner we can get back to important things, like next year’s election and actual government business. Trump’s not going anywhere, and the Democrats all know it. They simply can’t get over losing to him in 2016, and apparently don’t think they can win in 2020, either. I see that a lot with 3rd grade baseball teams, but didn’t expect it from Congress.
But carry on.
M
Maximus1
Guest
That defense is another two dayer
M
Maximus1
Guest
The only flaw is Biden was following orders not giving them. So they just ignore that on Hannity.
J
JButky
Guest
Desperate Dems Drop 'Quid Pro Quo' Rhetoric, Now It’s 'Extortion' And 'Bribery'
As polling shows the steam running out of the impeachment effort, Democrats turn to spicier language.
thefederalist.com
This is not going well for the Dems. It is more and more being seen as partisan witch hunt…
- Status