Unconditional love of God?

  • Thread starter Thread starter glendab
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Note: I put “not with God’s eyes” in bold because it really does not belong in the category of human eyes.

I do thank you for your efforts. Unfortunately, now that the “clarification” includes “not with God’s eyes”, the breach with Catholicism is growing. May I respectfully offer the suggestion that both of us return to basic Catholicism. Not being carbon copies of each other does not lead to the inclusion of “not with God’s eyes”. The presence of God is primary when it comes to Catholic teachings.

God’s unconditional love for all persons is primary even when we recognize our freedom to shape our own life. By freedom, we mean that there is the possibility of choosing between good and evil. Obviously, our freedom is part of our human nature and thus it can be considered our “condition” when it comes to how we live either in the state of Sanctifying Grace or the state of Mortal Sin. Obviously, God has determined the “conditions” for each state.
(CCC, 1730-1734)
The concept of projection is not a breach with Catholicism. In fact, it was a Catholic priest who taught me about projection in the first place, and I am grateful.

Yes, we can try the best we can to see the world and others with God’s eyes, and I think that is what you are saying. When we look with love, we are seeing with the Spirit. However, it is still me seeing. It is a very humbling thing. I can and should try to see the world from others’ perspectives, but when I do so, it is still with my eyes, I take ownership of that.

What does this have to do with unconditional love? Well, when we love others without condition, we will project that God does the same. We can know and truly experience such unconditional love.

But then, is this “relativism”? No, it is not, it is a matter of the reality of the mind. I am totally convinced that God loves unconditionally, and that is the truth I know. I take it upon myself to understand different viewpoints. To me, there is plenty of room for everyone in our loving Catholic family .
 
The concept of projection is not a breach with Catholicism. In fact, it was a Catholic priest who taught me about projection in the first place, and I am grateful.
Naturally, the concept of projection is not a breach with anything.🙂

It is the way the concept of projection is used which is why I can say that the breach with Catholicism is growing. For example, altering or ignoring Catholic doctrines to suit one’s own perception based on one’s projection is a favorite tool of some people.

Frankly, sometimes one’s preference for one form of semantics or another, such as the word unconditional, can be minor if there is a strong faith in God as taught by the Catholic Church and that God’s attributes are not denied.

Still, when the words unconditional love are considered as forgiveness, then this perception or projection flat out denies the Catholic Sacrament of Confession and Reconciliation.
 
What does this have to do with unconditional love? Well, when we love others without condition, we will project that God does the same. We can know and truly experience such unconditional love.

But then, is this “relativism”? No, it is not, it is a matter of the reality of the mind. I am totally convinced that God loves unconditionally, and that is the truth I know. I take it upon myself to understand different viewpoints. To me, there is plenty of room for everyone in our loving Catholic family .
But then, is this “relativism”? No, it is not, it is a matter of the reality of the mind.
For general information.

When the reality of the mind is used in reasoning to a truth, this is considered “subjective reasoning.” Subjective reasoning is one of the bases for relativism. So yes, using one’s perceptions and/or projections is a form of “relativism.”
 
What does this have to do with unconditional love? Well, when we love others without condition, we will project that God does the same. We can know and truly experience such unconditional love.

But then, is this “relativism”? No, it is not, it is a matter of the reality of the mind. I am totally convinced that God loves unconditionally, and that is the truth I know. I take it upon myself to understand different viewpoints. To me, there is plenty of room for everyone in our loving Catholic family .
For General Information.

Clarification of this statement.
“But then, is this “relativism”? No, it is not, it is a matter of the reality of the mind.”

When the reality of the mind, as the source of information, is used in reasoning to a truth, this is considered “subjective reasoning.” Subjective reasoning is one of the bases for relativism.

So yes, using one’s own perceptions and/or projections is one form of “relativism.”
 
Couldn’t a form of “relativism”, be that we are all relatives in that we are all members of the human family?

Couldn’t another be that since God is reported to have said, “Let US make man (humanity) in OUR Image…”, than we are all related by the God-given “fact” that we are ALL made in God’s Image?

Couldn’t another form of “relativism”, be that since God became One of us in the Incarnation, in the Person of Jesus, then we are all Jesus’s brothers and sisters by virtue of us being human?

Does anyone think/believe that God became One of us because God cares for ALL of us and extended the Invitation to be active participants in God’s Plan for God’s creation?

Ever given any thought that Christianity might not be about getting the best seat in the house, so to speak, as some the the Apostles seemed to originally think or even getting a “seat” but that there are “seats for ALL”?
 
Couldn’t a form of “relativism”, be that we are all relatives in that we are all members of the human family?

Couldn’t another be that since God is reported to have said, “Let US make man (humanity) in OUR Image…”, than we are all related by the God-given “fact” that we are ALL made in God’s Image?

Couldn’t another form of “relativism”, be that since God became One of us in the Incarnation, in the Person of Jesus, then we are all Jesus’s brothers and sisters by virtue of us being human?

Does anyone think/believe that God became One of us because God cares for ALL of us and extended the Invitation to be active participants in God’s Plan for God’s creation?

Ever given any thought that Christianity might not be about getting the best seat in the house, so to speak, as some the the Apostles seemed to originally think or even getting a “seat” but that there are “seats for ALL”?
This is absolutely wonderful. Thanks!
 
Naturally, the concept of projection is not a breach with anything.🙂

It is the way the concept of projection is used which is why I can say that the breach with Catholicism is growing. For example, altering or ignoring Catholic doctrines to suit one’s own perception based on one’s projection is a favorite tool of some people.
Well, granny, you are a bit of an exception, and that is a puzzle. You are the first person I have ever met who forgives others unconditionally but believes that God does not.

My cathechesis held that God always forgives. It is our choice to accept it, but God is always there beckoning and hopeful. God loves unconditionally, and forgiveness is an act of love.

I gather that you are perhaps feeling a bit of fear or aversion when you read my writing about how we project God. Such projection, too, was taught to me by a Catholic priest.

Granny, projection is inescapable. Projection is the only way we see. Your use of “projection” with the word “tool” indicates that people manipulate what they hear about God. Well, granny, you are correct. When people hear words, they hear them with their own individual vocabularies. If a child has only heard the word “love” associated with when she is going to be sexually abused, can you see even the problem with that word? So, yes, people hear words and have to rephrase and manipulate words and concepts (a gathering of words) in order to make sense of what is said about God. There is nothing wrong with this, Granny. This is not relativism. It is reality.
Frankly, sometimes one’s preference for one form of semantics or another, such as the word unconditional, can be minor if there is a strong faith in God as taught by the Catholic Church and that God’s attributes are not denied.

Still, when the words unconditional love are considered as forgiveness, then this perception or projection flat out denies the Catholic Sacrament of Confession and Reconciliation.
The concept of unconditional forgiveness does not deny the Sacrament of Reconciliation.

[edited by moderator]
 
Subjective reasoning is one of the bases for relativism.
All reasoning, Granny, is subjective. All reasoning is subject to the person doing the reasoning. The problem is when people’s reasoning leads them to rationalize harm.

For example, denial of the humanity of the unborn leads people to rationalize abortion. Denial of the feelings of victims leads to rationalization of molestation. Here is the truth, given by God: The unborn are valuable, wonderful humans, and children are harmed by molestation. These are examples of truths upheld by our Church and society.

Oh, and by the way, Granny this is what the moderator wrote me to clarify his intervention in this thread:

“Don’t question someone’s orthodoxy, sincerity, intelligence, etc.”
 
Hello Simple. Thanks for the response.

I don’t have any doubts about God. I’ve NEVER said I do not believe God loves me. I know He does. I love Him - He loves me. We do have a very deep and sustaining relationship. I love being Catholic.

QUOTE=simpleas;11672357]Thanks.

*Some doubts are healthy and lead you on to higher ground. Others need correction. Does this help? *

Totally with you there, you found your connection with God, though your doubts about him, so the question’s started. I don’t believe the question’s ever really cease, but if they are leading toward God, the more the better!🙂

I’m not sure how you believe that thinking God loves us unconditionally is a Protestant way of thinking? Clem has posted lots of quotes were God’s love is referred to as unconditional.
Can we think “God will only love me if I do not sin?” Maybe some can, I never thought God wouldn’t love me, he always loves, but does it mean he loves us more when we repent? No because his love is unchanging…

Ps. I eat fries with salt n vinegar n ketchup! 😃

God is the answer to all my questions. He has answered many.

As for the uncertainly that you have that the unconditional love of God is a Protestant thing, I have gotten that fact straight from them. It comes from a Once-Saved-Always-Saved theology. It distorts God’s love for us in that it says that God loves us so we really aren’t right to fear Hell because once we’re saved, His love will prevent us from going there. That’s why I say to accept the notion of an “unconditional” love of God for us is a slippery slope.

One of my friends is a fallen away Catholic who I’ve tried to get to return to the Sacraments and she has adopted this type of thinking although she doesn’t agree with all it says. She thinks she’s got to be sorry for her sins, but that God forgives them without the Sacrament as soon as she’s sorry and asks in her heart. She also believes that the love of Mary is what gains her graces and will eventually get her to Heaven. She no longer needs to go to Church because she can worship God anywhere. She believes the “unconditional love of God” is what prevents her from going to Hell. I’ve other friends who believe in an “unconditional” love of God and I don’t agree with their definitions of what this means. They rely on it in an unhealthy way.

As for someone here finding the phrase in Catholic teaching that is an exaggeration. What that person found was the word “love” disbursed and did a cut-and-paste job. The implication was that it was self-explanatory - if God loved, then He loved unconditionally. Only one cut-and-paste actually contains the word “unconditional” in front of God’s love and that is in reference to the prodigal son’s return and repentance. This comes from a reflection by Blessed John Paul II using the term “unconditional” love of God and it isn’t anything close to a* doctrinal *statement.

[edited by moderator]

And as I usually do say - these are my own opinions and I’m no expert on anything except maybe cuppy-cakes with sprinkles.

Glenda
 
Final Warning

Infractions have been issued for discussion of other posters rather than the topic. If it happens again, more infractions will be issued and this thread will be closed.
 
Well, granny, you are a bit of an exception, and that is a puzzle. You are the first person I have ever met who forgives others unconditionally but believes that God does not.
Perhaps, a little bit of explanation is due.

I am simply a human person. I do not have the power of the Catholic Sacrament of Confession and Reconciliation to remove the State of Mortal Sin from a person and then to give that person a share in the divine life of the Trinity aka the State of Sanctifying Grace.

Therefore: my “forgiveness” is not the same as God’s forgiveness of someone who freely allowed a mortal sin to destroy her or his State of Sanctifying Grace.

Once it is accepted that I am not equal to God, then it will be understandable that I can only humanly forgive another human. What God is asking us is to forgive someone regardless of what that person does or does not. It would be nice if that person apologized and/or made restitution. Regardless of what happens, I, in my human way, forgive other humans who trespass against me. (CCC, 2838-2845)

One of the difficulties of projecting our “eyesight” on God is that God is on a different level than we are. Therefore, we should not assume that God does what we do. We should not assume that because we can forgive unconditionally, that God will follow in our footsteps and throw out His concepts of Mortal Sin and Sanctifying Grace.
 
Hello Thorns. Thanks for the reply. I can only hope you’ve read all the thread.

Here is some simplification of things: God is Love. In Hell there is no God, therefore there is no love, nor anyone He loves because Hell is the eternal absence of God. It has other features like devils and eternal suffering, but for this thread it is sufficient to see that there is no love in Hell.

It was said by others that God never stops loving us because His love is “unconditional” which implies to some that it never ends to which I pointed out Hell and its absence of God therefore it contains no love since God is love and where He isn’t, there can’t possibly be love. Is this true? You tell me.

You say that God still loves those in Hell and He is somehow hurt by those there. No. They cease to exist in His mind. That is also a fact the Church knows about Hell. They are eternally forgotten by God. They no longer exist to Him.

Hell is a reality. Think of it often.

Glenda
It is hard to fathom, but I have read that God still has mercy for those in hell. They cant be saved, but He has ways only known to him to prevent greater suffering allegedly.

Hell is the absence of God, but the persons who chose to live away from God chose that absence by the way they lived their lives. God still loves them, even if they dont love Him.back. Dont confuse His Justice for lack of love.
 
Hello Simple. Thanks for the response.

I don’t have any doubts about God. I’ve NEVER said I do not believe God loves me. I know He does. I love Him - He loves me. We do have a very deep and sustaining relationship. I love being Catholic.

QUOTE=simpleas;11672357]Thanks.

*Some doubts are healthy and lead you on to higher ground. Others need correction. Does this help? *

Totally with you there, you found your connection with God, though your doubts about him, so the question’s started. I don’t believe the question’s ever really cease, but if they are leading toward God, the more the better!🙂

I’m not sure how you believe that thinking God loves us unconditionally is a Protestant way of thinking? Clem has posted lots of quotes were God’s love is referred to as unconditional.
Can we think “God will only love me if I do not sin?” Maybe some can, I never thought God wouldn’t love me, he always loves, but does it mean he loves us more when we repent? No because his love is unchanging…

Ps. I eat fries with salt n vinegar n ketchup! 😃
God is the answer to all my questions. He has answered many.

As for the uncertainly that you have that the unconditional love of God is a Protestant thing, I have gotten that fact straight from them. It comes from a Once-Saved-Always-Saved theology. It distorts God’s love for us in that it says that God loves us so we really aren’t right to fear Hell because once we’re saved, His love will prevent us from going there. That’s why I say to accept the notion of an “unconditional” love of God for us is a slippery slope.

One of my friends is a fallen away Catholic who I’ve tried to get to return to the Sacraments and she has adopted this type of thinking although she doesn’t agree with all it says. She thinks she’s got to be sorry for her sins, but that God forgives them without the Sacrament as soon as she’s sorry and asks in her heart. She also believes that the love of Mary is what gains her graces and will eventually get her to Heaven. She no longer needs to go to Church because she can worship God anywhere. She believes the “unconditional love of God” is what prevents her from going to Hell. I’ve other friends who believe in an “unconditional” love of God and I don’t agree with their definitions of what this means. They rely on it in an unhealthy way.

As for someone here finding the phrase in Catholic teaching that is an exaggeration. What that person found was the word “love” disbursed and did a cut-and-paste job. The implication was that it was self-explanatory - if God loved, then He loved unconditionally. Only one cut-and-paste actually contains the word “unconditional” in front of God’s love and that is in reference to the prodigal son’s return and repentance. This comes from a reflection by Blessed John Paul II using the term “unconditional” love of God and it isn’t anything close to a* doctrinal *statement.

[edited by moderator]

And as I usually do say - these are my own opinions and I’m no expert on anything except maybe cuppy-cakes with sprinkles.

Glenda

Thanks.
I see what you are saying. God’s love is unchanging even if we sin…so to me that sounds like unconditional love.
I would say what we need not fall into is, that when we sin we should think" God loves me anyway so I don’t need to repent or ask forgiveness", because if we do we become our own Gods.👍
 
Thanks.
I see what you are saying. God’s love is unchanging even if we sin…so to me that sounds like unconditional love.
I would say what we need not fall into is, that when we sin we should think" God loves me anyway so I don’t need to repent or ask forgiveness", because if we do we become our own Gods.👍
Agreed that presumption is always something to be avoided. And the message of the Church is that of the Gospel (Good News), that draws us to the fruit of love, not the fear of presumption. Repentance, conversion, humility, are founded on, based in, have as their source… the love of God, not the fear of sin (although healthy fear is part of loving God, it is not the central message). The Church proclaims God’s love, invites us to know God for who he truly is, and asks us to trust in him, first and foremost.
vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_30111980_dives-in-misericordia_en.html
Therefore, the Church professes and proclaims conversion. Conversion to God always **consists in **discovering His mercy, that is, in **discovering that love **which is patient and kind117 **as only the Creator and Father can be; the love to which the "God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ"118 is faithful **to the uttermost consequences in the history of His covenant with man; even to the cross and to the death and resurrection of the Son. Conversion to God is always **the fruit of **the"rediscovery of this Father, who is rich in mercy.
Authentic knowledge of the God of mercy, the God of tender love, is a constant and inexhaustible source of conversion, not only as a momentary interior act but also as a permanent attitude, as a state of mind. Those who come to know God in this way, who “see” Him in this way, can live only in a state of being continually converted to Him. They live, therefore, in statu conversionis; and it is this state of conversion which marks out the most profound element of the pilgrimage of every man and woman on earth in statu viatoris. It is obvious that the Church professes the mercy of God, revealed in the crucified and risen Christ, not only by the word of her teaching but above all through the deepest pulsation of the life of the whole People of God. By means of this testimony of life, the Church fulfills the mission proper to the People of God, the mission which is a sharing in and, in a sense, a continuation of the messianic mission of Christ Himself.
 
Well, granny, you are a bit of an exception, and that is a puzzle. You are the first person I have ever met who forgives others unconditionally but believes that God does not.
One of the difficulties of relying on our own eyesight or projecting our own subjective (relativism) reasoning on God is that God is on a different level than we are. Therefore, we should not assume that God does what we do. This granny cannot assume that because she can forgive unconditionally, that God will follow in her footsteps and throw out His concepts of Mortal Sin and Sanctifying Grace. This granny cannot assume that her unconditional forgiveness eliminates God’s conditions for the Sacrament of Confession and Reconciliation.

Here is post 218 which will help solve the puzzle.
There are really two separate questions being discussed here.
  1. What is the nature of God’s love? The title of the thread is "unconditional love of God?"And to answer that, we look at how God is revealed to us. The Church expresses this to us in various ways through scripture and the catechism, etc… Human beings have no effect on the nature of God. Hence if God loves unconditionally, if he IS love… anything we do or fail to do cannot change him.
  2. How do humans love?. How do we respond to who God is? Do we accept his love and act on it? The answer to that question is all over the place. None of us love as God does. We do not love unconditionally.
These two question are getting confused.
Some of us are talking about who God is, some are talking about who humans are. But we should not project human nature on to God, as if he is made in our image.
When I put aside my own perceptions or projections based on my human nature, and when I put aside subjective reasoning, I am free to independently study both points in post 218. 1) What is the nature of God’s love? and 2) How do humans love? The freedom of objective reasoning allows me to explore one answer for my human self and a different answer for God, the Divine Creator.

FYI Subjective reasoning means that our thoughts and reasoning arise from conditions within our brain. Subjective sources are our senses, our memory, our instincts, our perceptions, and so on. This can be a very good thing. A lot of us pay attention to gut instinct. However, subjective knowledge is “relative” to the limited nature of the human mind and the conditions of knowing.

Because humans have a rational soul, we are not restricted or limited to subjective reasoning. We have the ability to reason objectively meaning that we analyze information which is independent from our own anatomy. An objective truth is one which exists independently of human minds. For example, God’s love does not depend on human agreement as to what that love includes. While forgiveness is an act of love, we cannot assume that God’s love ignores a person’s freely chosen State of Mortal Sin just because some of us prefer to ignore the State of Mortal Sin.
 
One of the difficulties of relying on our own eyesight or projecting our own subjective (relativism) reasoning on God is that God is on a different level than we are. Therefore, we should not assume that God does what we do.

I agree completely. I do believe that God loves everyone more than what I can possibly imagine. Less, however, does not make any sense. I know exactly how and why I would forgive everyone if I were God. I am not God, though, but it simply does not make any sense that God would withhold forgiveness in a case where a mere human does not. Do you see what I mean?
This granny cannot assume that because she can forgive unconditionally, that God will follow in her footsteps and throw out His concepts of Mortal Sin and Sanctifying Grace. This granny cannot assume that her unconditional forgiveness eliminates God’s conditions for the Sacrament of Confession and Reconciliation.
Are saying that God only forgives if someone participates in the Sacraments? That leaves out a lot of people, Catholic and non-Catholic.
Here is post 218 which will help solve the puzzle.
When I put aside my own perceptions or projections based on my human nature, and when I put aside subjective reasoning, I am free to independently study both points in post 218. 1) What is the nature of God’s love? and 2) How do humans love? The freedom of objective reasoning allows me to explore one answer for my human self and a different answer for God, the Divine Creator.
I agree with Clem, in that we are not to limit God’s loves to our projections. However, we are not to limit God’s love by using the CCC either. I somewhat counterpointed Clem’s statements in that we humans can certainly try to forgive unconditionally, and we can certainly do so in time.
FYI Subjective reasoning means that our thoughts and reasoning arise from conditions within our brain. Subjective sources are our senses, our memory, our instincts, our perceptions, and so on. This can be a very good thing. A lot of us pay attention to gut instinct. However, subjective knowledge is “relative” to the limited nature of the human mind and the conditions of knowing.
Yes, and this is not “relativism”. The form of “relativism” you are speaking of here is universal. All reasoning is subject to the person who is reasoning. If not, please provide a single counterexample.
Because humans have a rational soul, we are not restricted or limited to subjective reasoning. We have the ability to reason objectively meaning that we analyze information which is independent from our own anatomy. An objective truth is one which exists independently of human minds. For example, God’s love does not depend on human agreement as to what that love includes. While forgiveness is an act of love, we cannot assume that God’s love ignores a person’s freely chosen State of Mortal Sin just because some of us prefer to ignore the State of Mortal Sin.
Oh, is this the counterexample I am asking for? Well, let me address it. Let us start with:

“God’s love does not ignore a person’s freely chosen State of Mortal Sin.”

Do two any two people have the exact same concept of “God”. No. Do any two people have the exact same concept of love? No. Do any two people have the exact same concept of “freely” No. Do any two people have the exact same concept of “State”? No. And this is just the initial look at the statement.

Our experiential backgrounds are very different and lead to our very complex vocabularies. Very often I have gone through long conversations on the CAF and at the end thought “Sheesh, I wish we had defined our terms first instead of going through all that mess!”. Vocabulary has a lot of subtle nuances Granny, important nuances.

I am not saying that we are to give up on speaking truths, though. The simple ones are harder to dispute and are less subject to differing experiences, but even these need a lot of clarification sometimes: i.e. “God loves us no matter what happens”. “Thou shalt not kill”. Do you see what I’m saying?

This is not relativism. Relativism is “I am just as right as you are”. “My truth is just as valid as yours is.” Relativism is an issue where hurtful acts are rationalized as consistent with a personal truth.
 
It is hard to fathom, but I have read that God still has mercy for those in hell. They cant be saved, but He has ways only known to him to prevent greater suffering allegedly.

Hell is the absence of God, but the persons who chose to live away from God chose that absence by the way they lived their lives. God still loves them, even if they dont love Him.back. Dont confuse His Justice for lack of love.
We also shouldn’t confuse God’s Justice with our “conception” of Justice.

Could be that God has the final say, so to speak, on just who can and can not be saved.

We also shouldn’t put what we may think are “justifiable limits” on God’s Mercy.

Ever heard or read the statement, “If I go to sheol, You are there.”?
 
I agree completely. I do believe that God loves everyone more than what I can possibly imagine. Less, however, does not make any sense. I know exactly how and why I would forgive everyone if I were God. I am not God, though, but it simply does not make any sense that God would withhold forgiveness in a case where a mere human does not. Do you see what I mean?
I know what you mean when you say
“I know exactly how and why I would forgive everyone if I were God. I am not God, though, but it simply does not make any sense that God would withhold forgiveness in a case where a mere human does not.”
Responding from my position, I believe that God is the “Maker of heaven and earth, of all things visible and invisible.” (Creed professed at the Sunday Holy Sacrifice of the Mass) Therefore, I believe that God determines the manner in which He shares His life with humans. It does not bother me that He has created a human nature which unites both the material and spiritual worlds because that nature is what gives me the opportunity to share in God’s life. (CCC, 355-357; CCC, 1730)
Are saying that God only forgives if someone participates in the Sacraments? That leaves out a lot of people, Catholic and non-Catholic.
My post did not say or imply the word “only”. Here is what I said regarding the individual Catholic Sacrament of Confession and Reconciliation aka the Sacrament of Penance.
“This granny cannot assume that her unconditional forgiveness eliminates God’s conditions for the Sacrament of Confession and Reconciliation.”

To begin at the beginning.
In the beginning … God created the unique human person biblically known as Adam. As the first human, Adam is unique because the whole human race is in Adam as one body of one man. (St. Thomas Aquinas, De Malo 4, 1; CCC, 404) This unity of mankind is addressed in CCC, 360 along with the cross-references in the margin. The small print (refer to CCC, 20-21) is below.
“O wondrous vision, which makes us contemplate the human race in the unity of its origin in God. . . in the unity of its nature, composed equally in all men of a material body and a spiritual soul; in the unity of its immediate end and its mission in the world; in the unity of its dwelling, the earth, whose benefits all men, by right of nature, may use to sustain and develop life; in the unity of its supernatural end: God himself, to whom all ought to tend; in the unity of the means for attaining this end;. . . in the unity of the redemption wrought by Christ for all.” (From Pius XII, encyclical, Summi Pontificatus 3; cf. NA 1; CCC, 360)
Please note the last line – “the unity of the redemption wrought by Christ for all.” All means all. To explain how all refers to all humanity, CCC, 1260 begins with this essential sentence. I put in bold a key teaching of the Catholic Church.
"Since Christ died for all, and since all men are in fact called to one and the same destiny, which is divine, we must hold that the Holy Spirit offers to all the possibility of being made partakers, in a way known to God, of the Paschal mystery."

The Paschal mystery refers to the passion, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ. (CCC, Glossary, Paschal Mystery/Sacrifice, page 891) At the dawn of human history, this Salvific Mission of Jesus Christ was promised to all of us. God did not abandon Adam and Eve and their descendants. (Genesis 3:15; CCC, 410-411)

To answer your question – Am I saying that God only forgives if someone participates in the Sacraments? – I am not saying that. As you can tell from the evidence I presented, all includes Catholics and non-Catholics.

I do recognize that you referred to someone who participates in the “Sacraments”. May I respectfully point out that I specified the Sacrament of Confession and Reconciliation and not the Seven Sacraments. Since I was specific, in turn, I can refer to the basic condition or fundamental requirement for a valid Catholic Sacrament of Confession and Reconciliation. Contrition is necessary for the reception of the Catholic Sacrament of Confession and Reconciliation. Contrition is sincere sorrow for our sins because they disobeyed our Creator Whom we love above all else. It is our love for God and our sincere desire to be in the State of Sanctifying Grace that we voluntarily seek God’s forgiveness. We detest our sins and we resolve not to commit them because we love God with our total being. We want to return to union with Him.

(CCC, Glossary, Sanctifying Grace, page 898; Mortal Sin, page 889; Contrition, page 872; CCC, 356-357; CCC, 1730; Those who are ignorant of the Gospel of Christ and of his Church, CCC, 1260; *CCC *847, small print)
I agree with Clem, in that we are not to limit God’s loves to our projections. However, we are not to limit God’s love by using the CCC either. I somewhat counterpointed Clem’s statements in that we humans can certainly try to forgive unconditionally, and we can certainly do so in time.
I put the sentence in bold because I am having a hard time understanding it. Please accept my sincere apology. I have no clue what this sentence from post 290 means.
"However, we are not to limit God’s love by using the CCC either."

My frozen brain needs a break. I will respond to the rest of post 290 later. :snowing:

Links to the universal Catechism of the Catholic Church, Second Edition.

usccb.org/beliefs-and-teachings/what-we-believe/catechism/catechism-of-the-catholic-church/

scborromeo.org/ccc.htm
 
Do two any two people have the exact same concept of “God”. No. Do any two people have the exact same concept of love? No. Do any two people have the exact same concept of “freely” No. Do any two people have the exact same concept of “State”? No. And this is just the initial look at the statement.
This is an excellent example of why it is so important to refer to the* Catechism of the Catholic Church, Second Edition…*when one is seriously seeking knowledge about God’s love and forgiveness.
Our experiential backgrounds are very different and lead to our very complex vocabularies. Very often I have gone through long conversations on the CAF and at the end thought “Sheesh, I wish we had defined our terms first instead of going through all that mess!”. Vocabulary has a lot of subtle nuances Granny, important nuances.
Yes. This is why it is very important to have a firm grasp on Catholic teachings. One has to be extremely careful about those important nuances; otherwise, one can fall into some weird interpretations of Catholic teachings.
I am not saying that we are to give up on speaking truths, though. The simple ones are harder to dispute and are less subject to differing experiences, but even these need a lot of clarification sometimes: i.e. “God loves us no matter what happens”. “Thou shalt not kill”. Do you see what I’m saying?
When it comes to clarification, I suggest the Catechism of the Catholic Church, Second Edition.
This is not relativism. Relativism is “I am just as right as you are”. “My truth is just as valid as yours is.” Relativism is an issue where hurtful acts are rationalized as consistent with a personal truth.
This is a good example of why I turn to the Catholic Church for its truths.
 
OneSheep;
Do two any two people have the exact same concept of “God”. No. Do any two people have the exact same concept of love?
I try and understand love through the greatest commandments, Jesus would have lived by them, as he spent his time on Earth. But how did Jesus love all his neighbours as he loved himself? Judas who betrayed him, the soldiers who nailed him to the cross.

We know Jesus prayed on the cross, forgive them father,

It seems that nothing should stand in the way of the greatest commandments, no one can do anything greater.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top