T
TonyBS
Guest
Its still there, looks like it took some time out thoughWhat happened to the Trinity now?
MJ
Turn Reason Into Notions Is That Yieldless
Regards Tony
Its still there, looks like it took some time out thoughWhat happened to the Trinity now?
MJ
Do you know Hulul? That should be subject of this thread.Again hasantas, there are a lot of fallacies and content from Baha’i “hate websites” in this post.
It is outside of the subject of this thread, so for the sanity of our dear moderator, Eric, we should leave it there …
.
Yeah. One source of Bahai is Hurufi(typefaceness)!Its still there, looks like it took some time out though
Turn Reason Into Notions Is That Yieldless
Regards Tony
St. Thomas Aquinas said God is one but God may be plural in relations. And he call these relations Father, Son and Holy Spirit and regard these relations distinct personality. Do not that mean plural persons and plural gods? But Christians say to believe in one God!
And St. Thomas Aquinas said Father is creator and Father had begotten Son later. Do not that mean Son was created later so Son cannot be God and eternal and Son cannot have same essence with God? Because the eternal essence do not change by time. If eternal essence do not change then how can we say that the eternal essence had incarnated? Is eternal essence dependent on time and matter?
Do eternal essence create another eternal essence? If eternal essence can be created so how can it be eternal and divine?
Thomas Aquinas used very difficult methods with philosphy which is not fair for common people but religion is for all people so it should be more easy to be understood by people. And it should not be hidden through mysteries!
Btw this rules out that the Mother of Jesus as a God.
- Does that not mean plural persons and plural gods?
No, because the persons are relations of opposition which are essential and do not import composition.- Is eternal essence dependent on time and matter?
No. The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are not creatures. The Son is begotten not made.- If eternal essence does not change then how can we say that the eternal essence had incarnated?
The eternal divine nature and temporal human nature are together in one person, Jesus Christ.
“For in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form.” Colossians 2:9
“For in Him was pleased to dwell all the fullness of the Godhead.” Colossians 1:19
There are several promises in the Old and New Testament that God will dwell amongst us. Please note the uncanny vision of prophet Micah about the exiles of Baha’u’llah from Assyria to Carmel over a period of 40 years:Ok, so in this incarnation is Baha’u’llah the… Father or the Son, or both… and what about the Holy Spirit ?
Ok, so in Bahaism… Baha’u’llah is the equivalent to the Christian Trinity ?Baha’u’llah is the Father. He is the Voice behind every Revelation in religious history. He also was the causation behind all the manifestation on earth of every Author of those Revelations.
He has revealed more than ever before about the relationship between Himself and the Essence of God (Deus a Se) and has also explained for the first time in religious history the the nature of Most Great Spirit who is the begetter of the Holy Spirit.
In some instances Baha’u’llah’s Revelation gives us an insight into how the Father and the Son conversed with each other. This is demonstrated with great majesty and poetic awe in Baha’u’llah’s Fire Tablet.
.
No. Baha’u’llah is the Father, but He shares essential commonality with the SonOk, so in Bahaism… Baha’u’llah is the equivalent to the Christian Trinity ?
."Naught is seen in My temple but the Temple of God, and in My beauty but His Beauty, and in My being but His Being, and in My self but His Self, and in My movement but His Movement, and in My acquiescence but His Acquiescence, and in My pen but His Pen, the Mighty, the All-Praised. There hath not been in My soul but the Truth, and in Myself naught could be seen but God. The Holy Spirit Itself hath been generated through the agency of a single letter revealed by this Most Great Spirit, if ye be of them that comprehend"
This dear Vico is where the purity of Divine Revelation is lost and the incorrect additions such as “uncreatedness” creep in.…, and the natural reason is added to it.
I have never aspired after worldly leadership. My sole purpose hath been to hand down unto men that which I was bidden to deliver by God…No. Baha’u’llah is the Father, but He shares essential commonality with the Son
Do you remember when the Holy Spirit descended upon Jesus at His baptism? The Father sent down the Holy Spirit in the form of a dove.
In like manner, it is the Most Great Spirit which descended upon Baha’u’llah. The Most Great Spirit is the begetter of the Holy Spirit.
Baha’u’llah states emphatically:
.
Neither the Father, the Son, or the Holy Spirit are Deus a Se.I have never aspired after worldly leadership. My sole purpose hath been to hand down unto men that which I was bidden to deliver by God…
—Bahá’u’lláh
So which is it… Bahá’u’lláh is God himself, or is he just doing God’s " bidding" for him ?
- Does that not mean plural persons and plural gods?
No, because the persons are relations of opposition which are essential and do not import composition.- Is eternal essence dependent on time and matter?
No. The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are not creatures. The Son is begotten not made.- If eternal essence does not change then how can we say that the eternal essence had incarnated?
The eternal divine nature and temporal human nature are together in one person, Jesus Christ.
“For in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form.” Colossians 2:9
“For in Him was pleased to dwell all the fullness of the Godhead.” Colossians 1:19
And TonyBS says there is no Conflict… Priceless .Neither the Father, the Son, or the Holy Spirit are Deus a Se.
When the Father refers to God, He is not pointing to Himself. The Father is not God, for there is an Eternal Hidden Essence of God which is inaccessible to all. The God referred to in all previous Dispensations was Baha’u’llah, but Baha’u’llah has now opened us to a Higher Reality.
There is and has always been a distinction between the Kingdom of the Eternal Essence of God and the Kingdom of His Names.
All previous religions have not been worshipping God, but the God “given to us” (Deus pro nobis) from the Kingdom of God’s Names (known as Yahweh/Jehovah/the Father in Judeo-Christian theology) by Moses (during His Dispensation), or Zoroaster (during His Dispensation) or Jesus (during His Dispensation) or Muhammad (during His Dispensation).
.
No, there is no independent or autonomous existence: one divine will and intelligence. There is mutual interpenetration of persons. There is a real difference in God but no parts. The category of relations does not require parts. The relations of opposition are the persons.
- There is no answer for my question. Are Father, Son and Holy Spirit exist at same time and do three persons have an autonomous existence? If the answer is yes then how? I mean how can we say one God?
- Son was begotten but when? Did God create Son? I do not exactly understand the meaning of being begotten!
- Which essence act in body? If divine nature never act in body then why do you say two natures? Cannot God act and effect and feel body wtihout being incarnated? Does Jesus have a human soul? How can eternal essence and mortal soul reconcile? Is human side of Jesus a half god so are there three and half gods? Or with human nature Jesus has a personality and with divine nature Jesus have another personality? That is very very very intricacy. Help God, Amin!
You say that the relations of opposition are the persons. For instance let’s assume three absolutely same robots in very details and composed with same material. These robots may have same acts, words, attributes, consubstantial, relations etc. We can call them Hasan, Bob and Mehmet. So are there three robots or one because every specifity is same?=Vico;13540069]No, there is no independent or autonomous existence: one divine will and intelligence. There is mutual interpenetration of persons. There is a real difference in God but no parts. The category of relations does not require parts. The relations of opposition are the persons.
What is that “before all ages”? That mean some time before everything but sometime. That “sometime” is not eternal.The Son was begotten before all ages, begotten does not mean created. The Son is eternal (uncreated).
A human has a human nature (essence): rational soul and a body. The ecumenical Council of Vienne (1311-12) defined as a doctrine of the faith that the human soul is the form of the body. There are two wills in Jesus Christ, the divine and the human. The Catechism of the Catholic Church describes this:
467 The Monophysites affirmed that the human nature had ceased to exist as such in Christ when the divine person of God’s Son assumed it. Faced with this heresy, the fourth ecumenical council, at Chalcedon in 451, confessed:
Following the holy Fathers, we unanimously teach and confess one and the same Son, our Lord Jesus Christ: the same perfect in divinity and perfect in humanity, the same truly God and truly man, composed of rational soul and body; consubstantial with the Father as to his divinity and consubstantial with us as to his humanity; “like us in all things but sin”. He was begotten from the Father before all ages as to his divinity and in these last days, for us and for our salvation, was born as to his humanity of the virgin Mary, the Mother of God. 91
We confess that one and the same Christ, Lord, and only-begotten Son, is to be acknowledged in two natures without confusion, change, division or separation. The distinction between the natures was never abolished by their union, but rather the character proper to each of the two natures was preserved as they came together in one person (prosopon) and one hypostasis. 92
91 Council of Chalcedon (451): DS 301; cf. Heb 4:15.
92 Council of Chalcedon: DS 302.
What conflict do you see, I think Servant explained how to understand the Trinity quite well.And TonyBS says there is no Conflict… Priceless .![]()
Tony,Baha’u’llah is the Father of who or what…?What conflict do you see, I think Servant explained how to understand the Trinity quite well.
One that shows the many sheep can and do have One shepherd.
Of course the comments made offer a great challenge to each persons Frame of Reference.
Regards Tony
“It is the spirit that gives life, while the flesh is of** no avail**. The words I have spoken to you are spirit and life.” John 6:63An advise let’s we say God is one and do not go beyond of that.