US Bishops: Save SNAP

  • Thread starter Thread starter BigBlueCane
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
A lot of people mistakenly believe that if both parties were pro-life, Catholics would flock to the Democratic Party. It is not the case. There are a lot of valid philosophical differences with regards to the proper role of government, and both liberal and conservative Catholics make their cases based on the teaching of the Magisterium.
Actually there is no real philosophical difference, since both parties believe in big government. Republicans did not propose any spending cuts, nor did they cut spending when they controlled congress.
 
Actually there is no real philosophical difference, since both parties believe in big government. Republicans did not propose any spending cuts, nor did they cut spending when they controlled congress.
:yawn:
 
Actually there is no real philosophical difference, since both parties believe in big government…
That’s like saying a guy who steals a piece of gum and a guy who robs a cash register at gun point are both equally thieves.

Yes, some Republicans have fallen into the trap when in power and have erred, but the Democrats are a million times worse. To make them both somehow the same is fundamentally false.
 
Is that the best you can do since there is no data to refute the claim that Republicans are big government spenders?
I get tired of the same drone, sorry… Feel free to debate it with someone else. I’m not interested.
 
That’s like saying a guy who steals a piece of gum and a guy who robs a cash register at gun point are both equally thieves.

Yes, some Republicans have fallen into the trap when in power and have erred, but the Democrats are a million times worse. To make them both somehow the same is fundamentally false.
The fact is, there has never been a republican congress that cut spending. That doesn’t mean some have erred, it means the majority has erred.
 
The sad truth is that those who will be affected the most are precisely those military families who have sacrificed so much for our country and get little to nothing in return. :nope:
 
That was the equivalent of a sneak punch when a guy is walking away from a fight. Pretty weak.
Par for the course, unfortunately. I just plain am not interested in debating it.

Hey, stink cat_14, you win. You are right and smarter than anyone else. Feel better? :rolleyes: 😛
 
The sad truth is that those who will be affected the most are precisely those military families who have sacrificed so much for our country and get little to nothing in return. :nope:
Actually, that isn’t the case…I don’t think you’ve read the proposed legislation.
 
Par for the course, unfortunately. I just plain am not interested in debating it.

Hey, stink cat_14, you win. You are right and smarter than anyone else. Feel better? :rolleyes: 😛
How can you debate it when the facts just aren’t in your corner?
 
How can you debate it when the facts just aren’t in your corner?
So, being declared winner isn’t enough? 😛

As, I’ve stated, I’m not interested in debating it with you…at all. I’ve read your posts. It is not worth my time. I have better things to do. Move along.
 
So, being declared winner isn’t enough? 😛

As, I’ve stated, I’m not interested in debating it with you…at all. I’ve read your posts. It is not worth my time. I have better things to do. Move along.
You have some secret knowledge that says that the republicans really believe in small government but that some devil forces them to keep increasing spending?
 
The fact is, there has never been a republican congress that cut spending. That doesn’t mean some have erred, it means the majority has erred.
The fact is that ONLY a Republican Congress has balanced a budget in our lifetime, under Newt Gingrich.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top