If this is the case, which I don’t think it is in any way, it would be a really idiotic move on Obama’s part. The polls are technically open and voting can commence, so by intentionally coming off as tired and weak he could be signing his own death warrant. If the polls weren’t open until after the third debate then that type of strategy might work, but as long as polls are open I can’t believe he would be that . . .
You’re in Ireland and I suspect have limited sources or limited time or limited interest in this race so you are basing your conclusions on what other people have said about Romney.
Over where? No Muslim immigration in my country, and what does it have to do with the thread title?
As you point out it was through the media over here. Every week for the past 2 months that’s all we’ve heard in relation to - Russia, UK Olympics, 47% voter comment, etc… Yes, you are correct and I have not heard his other speeches.
Unfortunately, we have no former Nazi scientists to help with our “green energy” programs.
His body language and expression were frankly ODD. Instead of looking at Mr Romney or even the audience during Romney’s comments, he looked down, tight lipped, seeming to be annoyed or angry. He look like he was walking through mud across the stage. It was like a little boy forced to do a piano recital for grandma…didn’t want to be there, didn’t think he needed to be there, and by golly we were all going to share his owlish attitude.
Reagon inherited a recession from Carter. He turned the economy around to become prosperous in 2 years
It sounds like you were getting the "best of " Romney perceived or real mis-statements instead of a more balanced viewpoint. For example Romney’s trip in Israel and Poland were characterized by absolute support and kudos…but I bet you only heard that he seemed to diss the Brit’s Olympic Security right? The press is one sided at best.
Of course there will be cuts. Obama has said about a million times that he intends to pursue a balanced approach, which means cuts as well as revenue increases if we want to start balancing the budget and bring down the debt. He has already authorized $1 trillion dollars in cuts and will probably do more. He will also let the Bush tax cuts expire on income greater then $250,000 a year. That means rich people keep the lower rate on the first $250,000 dollars they earn - just like the rest of us. Seems fair to me.
Bush inherited the dot.com bubble, a recession and 9/11 from Clinton. He turned it around as well. But unlike “Oblame-A” he didn’t whine and claim that it was all Clinton’s fault. In fact he launched Clinton’s post presidency shine with the joint Clinton/Bush41 initiatives. Ironically I think Bush did more to burnish Clinton’s tenure than he might have intended!
2nd debate is town hall which is very different than the 1st, and 3rd is foreign policy which the polls show is prioritised lower than the economy. Early voting is going on now in more in half than states. You need to make an impact in the 1st debate. Economy is at the top of most peoples list not foreign policy
It was a line from the debate. Apparently, you missed it. Did you watch the debate?
Explain the last 4 years with $1,000,000,000,000+ ($1 Trillion +) deficits every year?
Obama needed to continue his momentum to deep six Romney.Obama was bad because he wanted to wiat until the last debate?
2nd debate is town hall which is very different than the 1st, and 3rd is foreign policy which the polls show is prioritised lower than the economy. Early voting is going on now in more in half than states. You need to make an impact in the 1st debate
It still cost $100 Billion dollars - even with their help. This is an interesting article, thanks for the link.
But But But we inherited a mess and we needed to spend money like a drunken sailor in order to fix things!Explain the last 4 years with $1,000,000,000,000+ ($1 Trillion +) deficits every year?
Obama has said a lot of things. Unfortunately, his actions aren’t backed up by what he says. His “fair” tax idea has a revenue increase of a measly $48 billion over 10 years, while the 2013 budget he proposed has $7 TRILLION in spending increases (not new spending, just increases to currently funded projects) over the same 10 years.
IOW…who the heck knows?
