A
ac_claire
Guest
I’ll try to explain my problem with it. Ok, do you wonder about the difference, between when NFP was first “introduced” conceptually to the public at large, and now? I just wonder, what exactly has changed? Marriage is the same, NFP is the same (method-wise), all the biological stuff is the same. But what exactly constitutes a just reason for NFP has shifted a bit. Objective standards bow to trends of the pop-culture. This bothers me. I believe the growing acceptance of any reason being a “just” reason completely spits on the concept of having the “just reason clause” in the first place. Like, it’s only in there in the CCC as a formality, as a show. Because the reality is, there doesn’t need to be a just reason, any reason whatsoever will do as long as the couple thinks it’s valid. I’m not comfortable with that for the same reason I’m Catholic, the same reason I’m not comfortable with any kind of relativism or private interpretation of objective truths.Well, to be fair…Catholics in the US who use NFP are more the exception that Catholics using ABC or who sterilize themselves.
Sadly, vasectomies and other forms of birth control (that aren’t in line with the Magesterium) is quite common conversation in the circle of parents in my oldest DD’s class at our Catholic school…
And personally, I don’t see why it’s a problem for it to be left up to the couple to pray and work with God (in our private interpretation…somehow that seems so negative, but I may not be reading with the greatest amount of Charity) privately to determine whether another child is the plan or not.