J
jwinch2
Guest
Yes, it is.…I wonder if it is all in jest?
Yes, it is.…I wonder if it is all in jest?
Oh thank heavens! I know some of the Religious have really gone off the reservation but this seemed like way too outrageous to be true.Yes, it is.
Agreed, 100%Oh thank heavens! I know some of the Religious have really gone off the reservation but this seemed like way too outrageous to be true.
I’m happy to hear that this organization doesn’t represent the majority of sisters. You know the phrase, there are lies, d**mned lies and statistics! They kept saying it represented 80% of the religious and I know this attitude sure doesn’t represent the wonderful Sisters in our Parish or at the Retreat House where I take Spiritual Direction. I just hope they aren’t all labeled by the acts of a few.
Lisa
The Anglican Use mass is where it’s at! No guitars, plenty of incense. High Mass all the time. I love it. It has made me understand and believe that much more.Long overdue. Dissent in the Church needs to be squashed. Either follow the Catholic Teachings in the Catechism or get lost. It has to be this way. The liberal takeover of Vatican II is the cause of all this. I hope and pray the SSPX reconciles with the Church because that is the place I just might go. I’m sick and tired of modern style Masses. Sneakers, jeans, shorts, guitars, no incense.
In the course of the conversation, he [Vigano] made it known he had been at the beginning of the LCWR board meeting (which started Tuesday and ends Friday). Later, he invited about 20 people into the embassy to see the chapel and offer prayers.
Code:I don't have much hope that his welcome represents any new approach from the Vatican to LCWR (or anyone), but it is refreshing in Washington to see any protestors welcomed by any authority for a chat, at least.
ncronline.org/blogs/ncr-today/vatican-embassy-opens-doors-protestersCode:Vigano was removed from a Vatican post after cleaning up the Vatican Bank, a process in which he surely made enemies. The recently leaked documents include a letter of his to the pope, asking not to be moved outside the Vatican because of the message it would send. He may have some sympathy for LCWR, given his own experience.
Perhaps I am pessimistic. However I know a lot of Catholics between family friends and aquaintences and the vast majority are ultra liberal and would support (if they were aware) the nuns persepctives. Now, with support from the media, they have ammunition.I don’t see that at all.
We are heading full swing into a presidential election cycle, we have another push to raise the national debt ceiling, the supreme court hearings of Obamacare, discussions about military intervention in Syria, nuclear capacity in Iran, and we are on the brink of another economic meltdown in Europe. All of this is happening over the next few months.Perhaps I am pessimistic. However I know a lot of Catholics between family friends and aquaintences and the vast majority are ultra liberal and would support (if they were aware) the nuns persepctives. Now, with support from the media, they have ammunition.
You would be correct if the Church were simply a secular entity; it could never survive the current attacks by the world, the flesh and the devil. Don’t forget, however, that the Church is protected by St. Michael, guided by the Holy Spirit, and fortified by Christ’s guaranty that even Hell can’t prevail against Her.Anybody else think this has the potential to do more harm to the Catholic faith then the HHS mandate issue?
The main stream media (case in point a CBS morning news interview) will (and has) latched on to this thing as a BBV Big Bad Vatican news story. This coming at a time when homosexuality is glofied is a doubling up on the BBV.
This is casting the BBV as out of touch and power hungry. And, the world is listening. I don’t think this one is going away. Most Catholics who are already polarized in favor of; contrception, same-sex-marriage and even abortion (or so called “choice”) will be drawn to this like a magnet. I suspect parishes (at least some), under pressure, will conform.
My gut feeling. The church as we know it (or like to believe She is), save a small segment, is passing away before our eyes.
I don’t think so. Once it’s done and over with, it will once again look like the media made a mountain out of a mole hill. They made a big stink over the Vatican visitations too and the world didn’t end.Anybody else think this has the potential to do more harm to the Catholic faith then the HHS mandate issue?
The main stream media (case in point a CBS morning news interview) will (and has) latched on to this thing as a BBV Big Bad Vatican news story. This coming at a time when homosexuality is glofied is a doubling up on the BBV.
This is casting the BBV as out of touch and power hungry. And, the world is listening. I don’t think this one is going away. Most Catholics who are already polarized in favor of; contrception, same-sex-marriage and even abortion (or so called “choice”) will be drawn to this like a magnet. I suspect parishes (at least some), under pressure, will conform.
My gut feeling. The church as we know it (or like to believe She is), save a small segment, is passing away before our eyes.
A tiny percentage of Nuns who are not following the Church’s teachings are not going to bring the Church down. LCWR has 3% of US Nuns belonging to it, 97% of Nuns do not belong to this organizationAnybody else think this has the potential to do more harm to the Catholic faith then the HHS mandate issue?
The main stream media (case in point a CBS morning news interview) will (and has) latched on to this thing as a BBV Big Bad Vatican news story. This coming at a time when homosexuality is glofied is a doubling up on the BBV.
This is casting the BBV as out of touch and power hungry. And, the world is listening. I don’t think this one is going away. Most Catholics who are already polarized in favor of; contrception, same-sex-marriage and even abortion (or so called “choice”) will be drawn to this like a magnet. I suspect parishes (at least some), under pressure, will conform.
My gut feeling. The church as we know it (or like to believe She is), save a small segment, is passing away before our eyes.
“(The Church leaders) say in their mandate that they’re going to send in an archbishop and two bishops who will work with the nuns in order to - get this - revise their statutes, their handbook, their plans and programs, their conferences, their speakers, everything. If this were the corporate world, I think we would call it a ‘hostile takeover.’”
wibw.com/home/nationalnews/headlines/Sister_On_US_Nun_Controversy_Hostile_Takeover_155991905.html
Thanks for the compliment KSU" I cannot even begin to believe the amount of Catholics who are jumping on the bandwagon to defend these sisters’ heretical views. Charity and social work are fantastic, and the LCWR should be (and have been) commended for it…"—theidler
I don’t think many Catholics are jumping on the bandwagon to support the LCWR. There may be a few ignorant Catholics who believe the liberal drivel that the Vatican is persecuting nuns in habits who want only to pray the rosary and serve the Church. Those who loudly and publicly support the LCWR, however, are already on the bandwagon. In fact, they drive the bandwagon and are Catholics-In-Name-Only.
And while I understand what you mean by the sisters’ fantastic charity and social work, I really doubt that the LCWR itself can be credited with any of it. I believe that the LCWR is a major impediment to authentic charity and social work by sisters.
BTW, I would visit your blogs even if they were blank just to hear the chant and see the art work. Very nice!
Yes the bolded part is quite true and has been so for many years. I haven’t even been following the story, but just from news article over the past few decades it was apparent to me that LCWR was becomeing more and more heterodox.I have never seen the media mix something up so bad. Almost every single article on this issue shows habited nuns when the LCWR is anything but for the most part. It’s irritating, but I suppose it gives them another soapboax to bash the Church from.
Secondly, I cannot even begin to believe the amount of Catholics who are jumping on the bandwagon to defend these sisters’ heretical views. Charity and social work are fantastic, and the LCWR should be (and have been) commended for it**…but for pity’s sake, the theological views of the LCWR are so blatantly heretical and bizarre that I am not even sure why they are Catholic in the first place. **
And that brings up the question…why do dissident catholics remain Catholic??? Why go through all the effort to tear down the Church of Christ? Why not join some other movement? I just don’t understand.
I wrote about it on my own blog here and here.
My experience as well. It sounds like the big bad Vatican is picking on a cadre of Mother Teresas who only want to pray and serve the poor. I think sadly they’ve tolerated some pretty outrageous actions from some prominent Religious in the name of charity or diversity or some well intentioned but ill advised strategy.Yes the bolded part is quite true and has been so for many years. I haven’t even been following the story, but just from news article over the past few decades it was apparent to me that LCWR was becomeing more and more heterodox.
That’s why the CMSWR was founded. Many religious communities simply could no longer abide the heterodoxy of the LCWR.
And yet I find some Catholics around here getting upset about the Vatican persecuting the poor LCWR. I can only assume they are getting their news from purely secular sources, because they don’t have their facts straight.