I do not think Romney will end abortion. I suppose if he would restore the Mexico City policy, he may save some lives. Has he stated what he would do about the Mexico City policy?If the goal is endingh abortion I disagree. Romney can win. Your vote may be principled and honest, but it would be better spent in the corner of the ticket that can start doing something.
That’s my opinion, you can hold to yours.
Romney can not end abortion, he has said roe v wade should be reversed, judges he elects could reverse. Obama would elect more of the same pro abortion judges that could put the reversal or roe v wade back for decadesI do not think Romney will end abortion. I suppose if he would restore the Mexico City policy, he may save some lives. Has he stated what he would do about the Mexico City policy?
As long as faithful Catholics have that attitude, we will constantly and consistently be forced into voting for one candidate. That robs faithful Catholics of a voice on every issue but one. Social justice, poverty, international peace… we have no voice in any of those things as long as we continue to be forced into voting Republican because we want to stop the murder of innocents.If the goal is endingh abortion I disagree. Romney can win. Your vote may be principled and honest, but it would be better spent in the corner of the ticket that can start doing something.
That’s my opinion, you can hold to yours.
Yes he has. He would restore it. In addition, I respectfully invite you to consider this:I do not think Romney will end abortion. I suppose if he would restore the Mexico City policy, he may save some lives. Has he stated what he would do about the Mexico City policy?
He said he will reinstate it.Has he stated what he would do about the Mexico City policy?
Yes, he has said he will re-initiate it.I do not think Romney will end abortion. I suppose if he would restore the Mexico City policy, he may save some lives. Has he stated what he would do about the Mexico City policy?
Nonsense, Margaret22. And unfair. Romney will help give us a surpreme court that overturns Roe V Wade. Without that, you won’t get a chance to curtail abortion laws in the slightest.Ryan’s position indeed does NOT faithfully represent the Catholic Church. Either the unborn are human, or they are not. It only took a short time for Ryan to compromise his Faith and his Principles for an election. He first did it back when the Todd Akin controversy was going on. I guess only some “Beans” deserve life in Ryan’s new non-Catholic worldview.
AP poll: Ryan 51 Biden 43
Margaret, knock it off with the straw man arguments: “Romney won’t end abortion.” Who said he would? He will work to overturn Roe V Wade. Or do you not like that? Do you want to keep abortion on demand the law of the land? If so, then vote for Obama, not Romney.I do not think Romney will end abortion. I suppose if he would restore the Mexico City policy, he may save some lives. Has he stated what he would do about the Mexico City policy?
Good luck finding anyone with the legal standing to challenge it no matter how many right wing justices are used to stack the Court.Nonsense, Margaret22. And unfair. Romney will help give us a surpreme court that overturns Roe V Wade. Without that, you won’t get a chance to curtail abortion laws in the slightest.
It was difficult to pay attention to anything because Biden kept laughing and puffing and interrupting. I was finding it hard to take him seriously. Ryan kept his cool and each time he would gain momentum, Martha changed the topic.
You called it.It will be a tough debate. Ryan will come on with statistics, facts and figures in support of Romney’s proposals. Joe Biden will come out with broad and bold assertions (true or not) and much less statistical information to support Obama’s record or agenda. I don’t think Biden has the smarts to compete intellectually with Ryan, so do not be surprised by the appearance of “Blowhard Joe” at tonight’s debate.
Legal standing? What do you mean? And its not stacking the court - get your history right. Stacking the court is increasing the number of justices, not choosing good ones to replace bad ones.Good luck finding anyone with the legal standing to challenge it no matter how many right wing justices are used to stack the Court.
Because it would alienate moderate voters.My issue with Ryan’s reply about abortion is that he rightly says life begins at conception. Then how can Romney and Ryan be OK with abortion in the cases of rape, incest, life of the mother, etc.? There’s still a life involved.
Other than that, I thought he did a great job with that question, and good for him mentioning the HHSS mandate.
Thanks for this link. I have had a lot of difficulty deciding if my conscience will allow me to vote for someone (Romney) who has taken so many pro-abortion actions in the past. But I suppose Romney who I consider to be personally pro-abotion yet publicly (now) pro-life, is better than the reverse position that Biden tells us he holds.Romney can not end abortion, he has said roe v wade should be reversed, judges he elects could reverse. Obama would elect more of the same pro abortion judges that could put the reversal or roe v wade back for decades
Romney would reinstate the Mexico city policy
Romney’s pro life agenda he would take as president
I think Biden’s smirks will go down in history like Al Gore’s sighs. Pundits gave the win to Gore but that turned around the next days after voters showed dislike for Gore’s sighsIt was difficult to pay attention to anything because Biden kept laughing and puffing and interrupting. I was finding it hard to take him seriously. Ryan kept his cool and each time he would gain momentum, Martha changed the topic.
From what I was seeing on Twitter a lot was the smirking and laughing and it turned a lot of people off. I don’t think that will sit well with folks. Who knows.
Let’s pray next week’s Town Hall Meeting goes will. Keep praying folks!!!![]()
with critical mass anything can get done… what do you think got us in this mess in the first place… women’s lib was hijacked by a militant minority… and the silent majority had knowingly or unknowingly shifted so far to the left they “let it slide”…Good luck finding anyone with the legal standing to challenge it no matter how many right wing justices are used to stack the Court.