Views on Wicca

  • Thread starter Thread starter Syrokal
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I hope our visiting wiccans understand the answer they have received to the initial question. Wicca and Christianity are ideologically opposed. We reject all attempts to manipulate forces or “gods” as being from the evil one.

We believe in on God and it is we who must conform to him.

Man was made in the image of God and every since we have tried to return the favor.
 
Run, don’t walk to your nearest library and get a copy of Goddess Unmasked: The Rise of Neopagan Feminist Spirituality. by Dr. Philip Davis

Scott
 
I haven’t had the time to read the other posts here, so perhaps what I have to say has been said by others.

I think that Wicca is an unfortunate symptom of the relativistic times that we live in. It’s also a modern creation, despite the claims to pre-Christian paganism.

Most of the Wiccans I have known have been very nice women, but most often single and clearly in need of something “different” in their lives, a need to stand out. I’m afraid that, at least with the Wiccans I know, they might as well have “Look at Me! I’m different!” written across their foreheads. What is interesting is that some of these same women are also involved in the local Renaissance Festival, which seems to be more alive for them than the real world, and I have to wonder if Wicca is a way to kep the Renaissance Festival going all 12 months of the year…

Anyway, it is hard to take Wicca seriously. It certainly doesn’t stand up to any kind of intellectual approach: let’s just say that no Thomist need worry that any Wiccan is going to be able to best him in any discussion regarding metaphysics—or anything, for that matter. I have never had any discussion with a Wiccan that was rationally based—the discussions have always been emotionally-based, with relativism and silly platitudes being the main fare.

That being said, the Wiccans I know are nice people. I know lots of nice people, including a few nice atheists (I used to be a nice atheist myself). “Niceness” doesn’t count for much, though…
 
40.png
AnAtheist:
Those, who are not with us, are against us. Where did I hear that before?

That notion is exactly what brought the ancient Romans to prosecute christians. You are right and good - all others are wrong and evil. That intolerance was not tolerated in an empire which strived for so long, because (among other things) it was tolerant towards any religion.
Boy, am I glad, that our western society has left the dark ages and returned to that ancient tolerance again, called religious freedom.
I’m sorry but you betray a complete lack of knowledge concerning the history of ancient Rome not to mention the early Christian Church. You might want to consider purchasing a good history book, preferable one published by an accredited institution such as Oxford.

Pax.
 
Tom of Assisi:
Wicca (witchcraft?)
Wicca and witchcraft are not synonymous.
a new-age “religion”
Wicca is not a branch of the New Age, however much some of its practitioners make it seem so. It’s a theistic religion, with Gods who are distinct from humans.
that began about 75 years ago in college campuses in England.
Nope, it was begun about 50 years ago by a British civil servant named Gerald Gardner.
Basically it seems to comfound sexuality (esp. the loose kind) and worship of the divine in “nature.”
Wiccans do not engage in licentious orgies. We deem sex too sacred for that. Even the Great Rite is done privately.
It also mixes in an unhealthy dose of cultural relativism.
Relativism in that all religions lead to their Gods—but not that all religions are true.
Many Wiccans also think they are divine or part-divine,
Divine immanence is a belief of Christianity as well. Christians believe they are indwelt by the Holy Spirit, and Wiccans that they are indwelt by the Goddess and the God.
and that the Earth is not a ball of dirt as we have been led to believe…but in fact the Earth is a goddess.
Yes, the Mother of All Life, and not a resource to be thoughtlessly exploited.
It’s pretty hard to take the “religion” of Wicca seriously.
The Romans found it hard to take Christianity seriously in its inception.
When some teenage girl here in Eugene says “hee hee I’ve become a witch!” I feel like telling them, “Oh really…well I know an elf and a werewolf…maybe we can get together and have a party or something.”
It’s good to have fun with the fluffbunnies, but they are not the representatives of all Wicca stands for.

Blessed be.
HD
 
40.png
AnAtheist:
Those, who are not with us, are against us. Where did I hear that before?

That notion is exactly what brought the ancient Romans to prosecute christians.
That is quite incorrect. Romans persecuted Christians because they viewed early Christianity as secretive and therefore a possible threat to the empire. And since the Christians refused to offer incense once a year to the cult of the emperor (which everyone in the empire was required to do regardless of their religious offiliation) this appeared to confirm their suspicions.
You are right and good - all others are wrong and evil.
Nice lesson in tolerance here…
That intolerance was not tolerated in an empire which strived for so long, because (among other things) it was tolerant towards any religion.
Lets see…Nero had Christians tied to poles in his garden. They were coated with pitch then set on fire (all while being alive) and Nero would walk through his garden at night enjoying the scenery by the light of Christians being burned alive.

You have an interesting notion of tolerance.

And Nero was not the only roman emperor to act so tolerant of Christianity. Domitian murdered more Christians then all the rest put together. I guess he was tolerant too. And there were plenty of others.

Then lets not forget the roman citizens cheering on the death of innocent women and children as they were fed to the lions for roman entertainment.

Yep, nothing like those tolerant Romans.
Boy, am I glad, that our western society has left the dark ages and returned to that ancient tolerance again, called religious freedom.
Anti-Christian sentiment. The last acceptable form of bigotry.
 
Heathen Dawn:
Wicca and witchcraft are not synonymous.

Wicca is not a branch of the New Age, however much some of its practitioners make it seem so. It’s a theistic religion, with Gods who are distinct from humans.

Nope, it was begun about 50 years ago by a British civil servant named Gerald Gardner.

Wiccans do not engage in licentious orgies. We deem sex too sacred for that. Even the Great Rite is done privately.

Relativism in that all religions lead to their Gods—but not that all religions are true.

Divine immanence is a belief of Christianity as well. Christians believe they are indwelt by the Holy Spirit, and Wiccans that they are indwelt by the Goddess and the God.

Yes, the Mother of All Life, and not a resource to be thoughtlessly exploited.

The Romans found it hard to take Christianity seriously in its inception.

It’s good to have fun with the fluffbunnies, but they are not the representatives of all Wicca stands for.

Blessed be.
HD
Heather…I also have a friend I didn’t mention. He’s a vampire. He has turned himself into a bat and he will find you and turn you from a witch into a vampire. Ha Ha Ha Ha…somehow I didn’t think you’d mind a little silliness.

Wicca or witchcraft (which, if you recall, in an earlier post on another thread you said many Wiccans don’t call themselves witches simply because the name might be confused with Harry Potter) are hard to take seriously not because it’s so new, but because it’s so silly. :whacky: It has no philosophical or theological foundation. In short, it is not very adult…it’s not very Big Boy. It is self-serving and gives way too much freedom to one’s imagination (or make-believe if you prefer) by giving personalities to all sorts of inanimate objects such as the dirt and the water and the trees. I must be jolly fun to dance naked through the hills…pretending the great god pan is playing a lute and dancing alongside you. It must be very liberating to commune with the earth goddess. and the great sun god…and the great bear spirit…and Halloween is a most sacred holy day…uh…the days when the witches come out. The 18 year old girl I know who thinks she’s a witch always gets her broomstick out on Halloween and pretends to fly and she pretends to cast magical spells on people. SHe thinks it’s real and I don’t have the heart to tell her. :whacky:

I can’t read these silly posts any more (I’m sticking to the politics forum from now on)…what do you say to someone who claims a government bureoacrat decided to start worshiping the earth goddess one day 50 years ago, thus begining a new “religion”. (I guess we can ignore anything pretending at scholorship from Cambridge 75 years ago (Robert Graves et al…). 100 years ago they would have been put in a hospital to get help for his mental problem…now they’re praised as starting a new religion. Fine–any god or goddess anyone can imagine or pretend to see is “real” and really everything in nature (like very little children believe) is animated with a spirit. :whacky:

I guess…it it feels good…ignore common sense and grown-up behavior and do it. “tear the crib bars down…the people want to crawl back inside.”–(song lyric from “They might be Giants”) :whacky:

My only question is…which is the bigger holiday: Halloween or Earth Day? :whacky:

Oh…and who is doing the blessing in this “blessed be” bit? The earth goddess or pan?:whacky:
 
Well Tom, I see all those fruitbat icons you’re using, I can understand where you’re coming from … vis comica, faire rire and all that … so, I’ll just address one point.
Tom of Assisi:
what do you say to someone who claims a government bureoacrat decided to start worshiping the earth goddess one day 50 years ago, thus begining a new “religion”.
Rome, AD 83, Marcus talking to his son Gaius.

Gaius: Pater…
Marcus: yes, fili?
Gaius: I have something to tell you.
Marcus: yes?
Gaius: I’m leaving the Religio Romana.
Marcus: what? For what other religion?
Gaius: for Christianity.
Marcus: Christianity? Isn’t that an atheistic cult that denies all the Gods?
Gaius: it’s a new religion founded 50 years ago by a Godman in Palestine called Jesus Christ, who was crucified for our sins and rose from the dead.
Marcus: what?! You’re leaving the old religion of the Roman Gods for an upstart religion that’s only 50 years old?! Have you no shame?

😃
 
Tom of Assisi:
Heather…I also have a friend I didn’t mention. He’s a vampire. He has turned himself into a bat and he will find you and turn you from a witch into a vampire. Ha Ha Ha Ha…somehow I didn’t think you’d mind a little silliness…


Oh…and who is doing the blessing in this “blessed be” bit? The earth goddess or pan?:whacky:
Tom of Assisi, I wonder what you would think if you visited say, a Protestant forum and someone peppered their post criticising the Catholic Church with wacky smilies? What if they kept on writing about some of the more “interesting” devotions of ours, i.e. Infant of Prague, relics, especially incorrupt saints. In glass coffins for viewing. These things are not central to our faith but this is what looks mighty strange and noteworthy to those who don’t understand the context. Did you even read HeatheN Dawn’s earlier post? You brought up the same issues (using different words) that he addressed.

Making fun of or calling someone else’s traditions silly is ignorant and borders on bigotry if it isn’t the real thing. “Our religion is right and yours is weird” is not going to inspire interest or respect in someone on the outside looking in no matter what religion one is.

Here I am, a cradle Catholic, but if I wasn’t I would be unconvinced of the truth of the church if this is all that was presented to me of the Churches teaching.

Oh, and one more thing. It’s HeatheN Dawn. Or HD for short or if typing the word heathen makes you all wiggy. Getting names right is common curtesy. Shows you actually read posts.

Hi HD 👋 good to see you again.
 
HeathenDawn: Where is the new revelation of divine power that came 50 years ago? Christ’s death and resurection can’t really be compared to an intellectual attempt to recapture a barely understood ancient belief. The question isn’t about age, but rather of foundation. Wicca can not even be said to be founded on a divine revelation, and history certainly doesn’t make such a claim. Christianity, on the other hand, is definately historically held to be part of a divine revelation, or at least a purported one. They are very different beasts.

Furthermore, no one at the time considered Christianity to be a new religion, but a sect of a religion that had existed for as long as anyone had recorded. Christianity wasn’t viewed as seperate from Judaism for quite some time, when Judaism began to distance itself from Christianity, and the Christians began incorporating more and more former pagans.
 
I have run into several wiccans in my time in the military, they are usually always fallen away Christians. Most I have met do it as a way to be different, though not on purpose…I have noticed by the way they speak about other peoples beliefs and religions. They sometimes mean well, but it doesn’t make it good. Every Wiccan I have ever me has been very “unique” and they always stand out in a group of people when you work together with them…not in a good or bad way, but just “different”…it is a little hard to explain unless you see it.
One of my friends/co-workers is wiccan and he use to be Catholic. I asked him why he would give up the chance of eternal salvation for working spells and turning into dirt when he dies…there is no hope in that… He never was able to answer it, but said that Christianity is false. This is not logical, even if Christianity was false, that is not an excuse. If you spend your whole life wiccan, you are guaranteed to die and that is it…if you spend your whole like Christian, you at least get the chance of eternal life…I’d rather him at least have a chance at Heaven.
I like the guy, but sometimes when he talks about his wiccan beliefs, I can’t figure out if I want to slap him or give him a hug…
perhaps prayer is all I can do.
 
Hi Blood Rain! 👋 I check in now and then to see if there’s anything about Wicca and paganism.
40.png
Ghosty:
HeathenDawn: Where is the new revelation of divine power that came 50 years ago? Christ’s death and resurection can’t really be compared to an intellectual attempt to recapture a barely understood ancient belief. The question isn’t about age, but rather of foundation. Wicca can not even be said to be founded on a divine revelation, and history certainly doesn’t make such a claim. Christianity, on the other hand, is definately historically held to be part of a divine revelation, or at least a purported one. They are very different beasts.
Well, indeed, as you say, I don’t see much equivalence, or even any point in finding any. But for satisfaction’s sake, I might say that, a little more than 50 years ago, the Goddess and the God initiated Gerald Gardner as Their first priest. And those of Traditional Wiccan covens, such as Gardnerians and Alexandrians, maintain a system in which all priests and priestesses must be initiated by someone with a prior initiation, showing lineage ultimately back to Gardner—a concept which is similar to the Catholic one of Apostolic Succession.
Furthermore, no one at the time considered Christianity to be a new religion, but a sect of a religion that had existed for as long as anyone had recorded.
I don’t see you giving much respect for that kind of argument when it comes from Protestants. 😉 I mean, breakoff sects are just that: breakoffs. Christianity is to Judaism what Lutheranism, Calvinism, Anglicanism and all the rest are to Catholicism.
Christianity wasn’t viewed as seperate from Judaism for quite some time, when Judaism began to distance itself from Christianity, and the Christians began incorporating more and more former pagans.
I’m a former Orthodox Jew, and I can tell you Jews view Christianity, especially its Trinity, its doctrine that God became a man, as far out as Christians view the henotheistic, finite-fleshly-Gods theology of Mormonism.
 
And those of Traditional Wiccan covens, such as Gardnerians and Alexandrians, maintain a system in which all priests and priestesses must be initiated by someone with a prior initiation, showing lineage ultimately back to Gardner—a concept which is similar to the Catholic one of Apostolic Succession.
Similar, but hardly the same. One is instituted by man making no divine claims and providing no evidence, the other is instituted by man with nothing but divine claims, and heavy testimony to the divine. Wicca has little in the way of spiritual or historical backing.
I don’t see you giving much respect for that kind of argument when it comes from Protestants. 😉 I mean, breakoff sects are just that: breakoffs. Christianity is to Judaism what Lutheranism, Calvinism, Anglicanism and all the rest are to Catholicism.
A broken watch is right twice a day. Christians did not consider themselves a break-off sect, and neither did Jews, initially. It was all within the family, so to speak. It was only after large amounts of non-Jewish converts were made that the divide began, and it culminated in the hailing of a different “Messiah” by many of the Jews of the day. At that point Christians began distancing themselves from Jews, and Romans began measuring Christians seperately from Jews.
I’m a former Orthodox Jew, and I can tell you Jews view Christianity, especially its Trinity, its doctrine that God became a man, as far out as Christians view the henotheistic, finite-fleshly-Gods theology of Mormonism.
As a near convert to Orthodox Judaism, I can say that modern Jews have about as much in common with Temple Judaism as Jehovah’s Witnesses have with the Apostles. The Judaism of today, even Orthodox Judaism, is far from the Judaism of time of the Temple. Furthermore, much of later Jewish theology, espescially in the Talmud, was formulated specifically to counter the growth of Christianity; in some aspects modern Judaism is an “anti-religion”. Christianity found fertile ground in the Judaism of the day, at least enough so that events like the loss of the Sacrificial Miracles of the Temple were associated with the “apostacy” of so many Jews to Christianity. Comparing modern Judaism to the Judaism of Jesus’ day is extremely erroneous, as not even the center of faith and worship survives today.
 
40.png
Ghosty:
One is instituted by man making no divine claims and providing no evidence, the other is instituted by man with nothing but divine claims, and heavy testimony to the divine.
I may construe this as Gerald Gardner having been less megalomaniac than Jesus. 😉 But seriously, we don’t know that Jesus ever saw himself as God or said he was God, and we do know sayings and deeds can be falsely attributed. The Bible has a proven example of that: the book of Ecclesiastes says it was written by King Solomon, but the language of that book, which is close to Mishnaic Hebrew, shows that it cannot have been. False attribution is easy to find.
Wicca has little in the way of spiritual or historical backing.
It’s of no importance. Even the quasi- Apostolic Succession concept I mentioned is fast losing importance in Wiccan circles nowadays. The Catholic-like claim to a historical chain leading up to Gardner is being replaced by a Protestant-like claim that each Priest and Priestess has been directly initiated by the Goddess and the God, not by another human by laying on of hands.
Christians did not consider themselves a break-off sect, and neither did Jews, initially. It was all within the family, so to speak.
And neither was English very different from German a thousand years ago, or humans very different from apes. But Christianity evolved to become much, much different from Judaism.
As a near convert to Orthodox Judaism, I can say that modern Jews have about as much in common with Temple Judaism as Jehovah’s Witnesses have with the Apostles. The Judaism of today, even Orthodox Judaism, is far from the Judaism of time of the Temple.
Of course, since there is no Temple! But the Temple sacrifices have been replaced by prayers: three prayers a day corresponding to the three daily temple sacrifices.
Furthermore, much of later Jewish theology, espescially in the Talmud, was formulated specifically to counter the growth of Christianity; in some aspects modern Judaism is an “anti-religion”.
The Talmud doesn’t bash Christianity very much. Most of the Talmud contains the discussion and codification of the Jewish Halakhah, the system of laws that regulates every aspect of the Jew’s life, from shoelaces to the throne. In that, Talmudic Judaism is a lineal descendant of the religion of the Pharisees Jesus confronted.
Christianity found fertile ground in the Judaism of the day, at least enough so that events like the loss of the Sacrificial Miracles of the Temple were associated with the “apostacy” of so many Jews to Christianity. Comparing modern Judaism to the Judaism of Jesus’ day is extremely erroneous, as not even the center of faith and worship survives today.
But to compare Christianity, post-Nicene, to Judaism is erroneous too. Did I mention the Trinity? This is a theological innovation that no Jew had ever known. God’s Son? God born of a Virgin, Mother of God? God becoming a man? God dying? To Judaism, to any Judaism, whether in Jesus’s time or Orthodox Judaism today, these concepts are as heterically innovative as the theology of Mormonism.

There is a reason my forefathers in Europe never converted to Christianity.
 
Tom of Assisi:
. In short, it is not very adult…it’s not very Big Boy. It is self-serving and gives way too much freedom to one’s imagination (or make-believe if you prefer) by giving personalities to all sorts of inanimate objects such as the dirt and the water and the trees. I must be jolly fun to dance naked through the hills…pretending the great god pan is playing a lute and dancing alongside you.
Wow!! You must really want someone to start making fun of your religion! I find many aspects of Christianity to be silly, but I do not talk to people with different views like this.:ehh:

Remember, treat people the way you wish to be treated.:tsktsk:
 
Heathen Dawn:
I may construe this as Gerald Gardner having been less megalomaniac than Jesus. 😉 But seriously, we don’t know that Jesus ever saw himself as God or said he was God, and we do know sayings and deeds can be falsely attributed. The Bible has a proven example of that: the book of Ecclesiastes says it was written by King Solomon, but the language of that book, which is close to Mishnaic Hebrew, shows that it cannot have been. False attribution is easy to find.
Got to pick on this one… Christ said he was God many many times and the witnesses to the miracles he performed prove it. Now, even if you assume everyone is lying and the stories are made up you are still left with one logical problem.

I’ve have never heard a Wiccan refer to Christ as an immoral or evil person - most would regard him as an important spiritual leader and a pretty good guy.

Jesus Christ said he was God, therefore you are left with the choice that either he was,** or** he was a serial liar and one of the greatest conmen in history - so which is it?
 
Wicca seems to be the religion of those who live in the alternative lifestyle. Most people who I know that “practice” Wicca were formally Christians and chose their religion after watching “The Craft” and found out that Wicca has no moral restrictions. Then there are the ones who say that the Christians stole everything from the Pagans. Just like how our secular government was stolen from the Pagan Greeks.
 
40.png
kjvail:
Jesus Christ said he was God, therefore you are left with the choice that either he was,** or** he was a serial liar and one of the greatest conmen in history - so which is it?
False dichotomy. You forgot to mention that he might have been sincere in his belief, but mistaken nevertheless.
 
Heathen Dawn: We weren’t discussing anything post-Nicene, but rather early Roman persecution of Christianity, and conversions within the first 100 years or so.

As for Judaism, the whole philosophy and practice of Judaism has changed due to the loss of the Temple, and that’s my entire point. Even the Pharisees were based on the Temple practices. As for the Talmud, there is much in there that directly attacks Jesus and his followers, and much more that simply establishes beliefs almost intentionally contrary to Christianity (and other, non-Pharisiac strains of thought).

Of course none of this is here nor there with regards to Wicca. The fact remains that Wicca has no claims to divine revelation, regardless of the authenticity of Christian claims. I can’t take seriously a “faith” that is self-admittedly a purely human philosophy.
 
40.png
kjvail:
Christ said he was God many many times and the witnesses to the miracles he performed prove it.
It is written that Christ said he was God. It is written that he performed miracles.
Now, even if you assume everyone is lying and the stories are made up you are still left with one logical problem.

I’ve have never heard a Wiccan refer to Christ as an immoral or evil person - most would regard him as an important spiritual leader and a pretty good guy.

Jesus Christ said he was God, therefore you are left with the choice that either he was,** or** he was a serial liar and one of the greatest conmen in history - so which is it?
This is the old “Lord, Liar, Lunatic” trilemma, and its basic problem is it’s jury-rigged towards the Christian worldview. I regard the trilemma invalid: “Mythologised, Misquoted, Misrepresented” is the trilemma I would espouse. I think Jesus never said he was God, but this claim was falsely attributed to him. I do not regard the Gospel of John as a recording of Jesus’s words.
40.png
Ghosty:
The fact remains that Wicca has no claims to divine revelation, regardless of the authenticity of Christian claims. I can’t take seriously a “faith” that is self-admittedly a purely human philosophy.
So the more high-flying the claim, the more you take it seriously? Used car dealers would be delighted to have a customer like you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top