C
condan
Guest
Kolbe and Vianney are saints. Egan is a cardinal.An ignorant comment? Likely. Hateful? You must be more discerning of her heart than I am.
I prefer to be charitable in assessing the intent of others.
How can you miscount by 5? Here’s how: I look at a map of Franciscan, and count 9 buildings with names I do not know to be Saints: JC Williams, Finnegan, Clare, Kolbe, Vaccaro, Egan/Stafford, Starvaggi, Vianney, Scotus. If I stop to examine the fine print more closely, I see that Vaccaro is merely a ball field. That leaves me with 8.
I am sure you can educate me as to which of these are Saints or otherwise non-donors, and I appreciate it. There’s always more to learn.
The idea that 2 buildings named after donors is fine, but that 7 is scandalous, strikes me as absurd. Either it’s right, or it’s not right. I think it’s perfectly OK, and if I were seeking an example to make my point, I might very well select Franciscan, which is known for its fidelity to Catholic teaching. Doing so would not make me hateful.
Nonetheless, it was ignorant of the facts, and definitely careless of katherine2 to post with the air of certainty which she did. Simply saying “It appears that…” would have made the point, but left room for legitimate doubt, doubt which you rightly verified.
As far as one’s main virtue being money, I wasn’t aware that being rich and having a dedication to the faith were mutually exclusive. Tom Monaghan (founder of Dominos Pizza) comes instantly to mind.