Well the problem is that some people think that ‘just bringing people to Jesus’ is the only thing necessary. And what exactly do they mean by ‘bringing to Jesus”?
Some Christians think that if they convince a person to say the Sinner’s Prayer, that person now has ‘come to Jesus’ and nothing further need be done.
Some Christians think that bringing a person to Jesus involves teaching “Christianity’ —their Christianity being the prosperity gospel… . .and nothing further needs to be done.
Some Christians think bringing a person to Jesus involves Baptism—whether the person has been baptized as a Christian by ‘another group’ or not.
Some Mormons and Jehovah Witness speak of themselves as Christians but teach, each of them, a completely different gospel than any other Christian group, and call that ‘bringing the person to Jesus”.
Some Christians require ‘personal testimony.’ Some Christians Amish and some Mennonite for example, require the person coming to Jesus to eschew all other Christians and to remain in a segregated community and to practice radically different lifestyles.
Some Christians require, to bring a person to Jesus, that the person become a registered member and even to tithe. Some Christians once the person says the Sinner’s prayer or are baptized or register in a parish just ‘count them’ as members and never check to see if they ever come back again.
Some Christians require two sacraments, some seven.
Some Christians believe that the bread and wine become the Body and Blood, Soul and Divinity, of Jesus, and that participation in this sacrament is the source and summit of life.
Some Christians believe the bread and wine are symbolic only.
So there is so much difference, not only in HOW to bring a person to Jesus, but on how a person then should LIVE for Jesus, and above all, great difference on who some Christians think Jesus IS.
So it really does matter which Christian group is RIGHT, doesn’t it?