Wedding Reception: How Much Does The Groom's Wishes Count?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lax16
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Easter Joy…what section of the country do you live? Because maybe we’re talking about different cultures. Don’t know.

Yes, I do agree that this should be discussed at the time of the engagement but I don’t know how a groom’s parents are to ask the bride “What are you paying for?”

Also, I asked you two question as what was fair or not fair and you neglected to respond to either.

I’ve had one incident concerning groom’s parents who were asked by the bride shortly after the engagement, “What are you paying for?” Hmmmm. The groom’s father, generous man who had paid the full bill for son’s education, asked the lad to lunch and said to him, “I owe you nothing.” He did not owe him a college education but gave it to him. From that education he was able to give his bride a very nice life style.

You did astutely predict that all these problems can have fallout with holidays etc. and the interaction with family. And you are right about that.
And that’s why I want to have as little as possible to do with the financial process. Shaking down the other family is not my cup o’tea.

The “Here’s a check, Baby Girl/Baby Boy! Just tell me when and where to show up!” approach is sounding better and better all the time.

(Long story, but due to family complications, we wound up doing a Catholic elopement. I suspect my dad, in particular, was relieved–my sister was getting married less than a year later in a foreign country where they do multi-day wedding extravaganzas.)
 
Anytime parents are invited, they are being included in the wedding, so they shouldn’t boohoo about it. Being invited is being included.
No, this is just your opinion.

So Aunt Mabel, and the guy that son in law met once that is a friend of the bride’s dad, and the parents of the groom are all invited, so you would say that means they are all included?

I agree with aicirt, that is cold.
 
As long as I thought my child’s intended was acceptable and they were having a Catholic wedding I wouldn’t mind at all.
It’s the only thing I cared about for my two and I didn’t get that.

Oh, wait, I got the “intended was acceptable”; I didn’t get the Catholic wedding. Neither are validly married.
 
So Aunt Mabel, and the guy that son in law met once that is a friend of the bride’s dad, and the parents of the groom are all invited, so you would say that means they are all included?
Yep.

It sure saves a lot of hurt feelings to keep a low bar for what it means to be “included.”
 
I remember when my sister married way back when and her etiquette books showed the Catholic wedding procession differently than the Protestant wedding procession. The bride was not given away in the Catholic version. (I cannot remember if the bride and groom came in together or not.) I sort of scratched my head about it, because the “Protestant” way was the only one I had ever seen at the weddings I had been to or had seen on TV.

In other words, the Catholic liturgical “best use” had been communicated in the US by somebody, but it was not observed everywhere. I’m guessing that the authors had gone to some monsignors who had told them the actual liturgically-correct Catholic way instead of the most typical way.
I’ve never seen the Catholic way but yes that is the correct way. I wonder why Catholic churches don’t insist on it? Having said that I do prefer the more common way because then the groom first sees the bride on the altar. Unlike many Protestant churches, the bride isn’t given away, nor does she promise to obey.
 
The more weddings we host, the more I find myself relaxing on things.

Our first daughter’s wedding, my husband and I paid for all of it. The groom’s parents offered to help. We said it wasn’t necessary and we appreciated them putting on the rehearsal dinner. We did not include their names on the invitations, not out of spite, but just because we were hosting. What I really cared about at the time was that no young children be allowed. It was an adult affair, black tie optional. I wasn’t up for the out of control kids that I’d seen at other weddings.

Daughter #2 got married and our first grandchild was born 10 days earlier. Mom of the baby was our first bride. She was matron of honor. Instead of carrying flowers down the aisle, she carried the baby. It was very sweet. We paid for this wedding, too. The groom’s parents paid for the rehearsal dinner.

Fast forward to now, daughter #3 is getting married in November. We have 5 grandchildren, the groom’s side has 3…all 8 will be in the wedding and I am ecstatic. They are between ages 1 and 7. Still black tie optional. I think there will be wrestling with the boys :rolleyes:…Once again, we are paying for the wedding. The groom’s parents are paying for the rehearsal dinner. My bride wanted the groom’s parents’ names on the invitation, and since it mattered to her it was fine with me. Their names are on.
 
I’ve never seen the Catholic way but yes that is the correct way. I wonder why Catholic churches don’t insist on it? Having said that I do prefer the more common way because then the groom first sees the bride on the altar. Unlike many Protestant churches, the bride isn’t given away, nor does she promise to obey.
The whole "seeing the bride at the altar’ is based on superstition which has no place in a Catholic ceremony.

The Catholic Rite actually advises the bride and groom to greet their guests at the door of the church. Then they in turn are greeted by the priest at the door and process up last in the entrance procession.
 
No, this is just your opinion.

So Aunt Mabel, and the guy that son in law met once that is a friend of the bride’s dad, and the parents of the groom are all invited, so you would say that means they are all included?

I agree with aicirt, that is cold.
Thank you for the support. I’m stunned that a parent’s sadness should be disregarded with the remark “they shouldn’t boohoo about it.” If she’s talking about either set of parents, it is really terrible. No one should gloat over someone, especially someone who loves you or your husband, who is feeling alone and left out.
 
Why would the OP mention sacramental preparation when there aren’t any problems with the sacramental preparation? Sometimes the problem is not the worst problem the parent could have and yet it they still have a problem they have to decide how to navigate.

When someone has their feelings hurt over how a wedding is being done, I don’t think it does a lot of good for them to debate about whether or not they are entitled to have their feelings hurt. If their feelings are hurt, they’re hurt. The question is whether they can communicate their feelings–disappointment, offense, anger, what have you–without causing any undue harm. Usually, the people who love you do care about your feelings, provided they do not feel you are using those hurt feelings to manipulate the situation in your own favor. God want to be invited into the relationship between the adult parent and the adult child, too, even when it is about something as trivial as party invitations.

Parents of Younger Children: This thread is yet one more reminder that the time to establish lines of communication with regards to feelings and how to mutually work out your expectations of each other as fellow adults is well before you have to face a challenge as big as a wedding. You can hardly start this too early. If you communicate about your feelings with each other on a regular basis, you’ll have a better idea about what result some communication strategy is the most likely to have. Sure, there is a degree to which “all bets are off” when it comes to weddings, they are emotional mine-fields, but that is all the more reason not to put off learning how to talk to your parents and your adult children as adults well before the decision to get married.
I think I’m trying to say that the specialness of the sacrament is being lost in the preparation.
 
Why would the OP mention sacramental preparation when there aren’t any problems with the sacramental preparation? Sometimes the problem is not the worst problem the parent could have and yet it they still have a problem they have to decide how to navigate.

When someone has their feelings hurt over how a wedding is being done, I don’t think it does a lot of good for them to debate about whether or not they are entitled to have their feelings hurt. If their feelings are hurt, they’re hurt. The question is whether they can communicate their feelings–disappointment, offense, anger, what have you–without causing any undue harm. Usually, the people who love you do care about your feelings, provided they do not feel you are using those hurt feelings to manipulate the situation in your own favor. God want to be invited into the relationship between the adult parent and the adult child, too, even when it is about something as trivial as party invitations.

Parents of Younger Children: This thread is yet one more reminder that the time to establish lines of communication with regards to feelings and how to mutually work out your expectations of each other as fellow adults is well before you have to face a challenge as big as a wedding. You can hardly start this too early. If you communicate about your feelings with each other on a regular basis, you’ll have a better idea about what result some communication strategy is the most likely to have. Sure, there is a degree to which “all bets are off” when it comes to weddings, they are emotional mine-fields, but that is all the more reason not to put off learning how to talk to your parents and your adult children as adults well before the decision to get married.
Ok, full disclosure…this thread was hitting a little too close to home for me. Let’s just say DH and I postponed first wedding and changed venues (and paid for it ourselves) due to uncharitable family members who wanted the day to be about them and not me and my DH.
 
ZOWIE…you got my head spinning. “If someone can prudently see that placing themselves in a lower place could embarass their hosts, they shouldn’t do it.” Not sure what this would be referring to. Using the literal example of this passage from Luke, he is not talking about parents of the new couple.

“How do you know that?” you ask. Because in the Jewish ceremony the bride is given by her parents in marriage. And our Catholic weddings follow the Jewish tradition. So parents have a part in the ceremony. Hence, we have the fathers of our brides give them “away” to the groom.

No, you are correct. The Ten Commandments does not state that the wedding invitations should list the parents on the wedding invitation. But it has been the Catholic tradition, in following the Jewish one, that the parents of the bride give the reception. Parents, traditionally, have a part in the religious ceremony with the couple. Parents are honored participants. Fact.

Let’s just discuss one situation here: the groom’s parents getting half the bill or no inclusion on the invite. I do not think that is right.

Let’s just discuss that situation. You are the groom’s parents. The bride’s parents are doing the wedding you have not been consulted, fair enough, until they hand you the bill for your share. Hmmm. In the meantime, you and hubby were planning on holding the rehersal dinner, and maybe there is a $$ present coming. Now you are given half the wedding reception bill. Warm fuzzies? I don’t think so. And if you don’t pay up, no inclusion on invitation. Fair?

Second scenario, as per OP, there are financial bumps happening in groom’s family. Bride’s family went ahead and made arrangements never consulting groom’s family about any part of the gala but want them to pay half. Fair?
Did you know that churches in our area are trying to do away with the father giving the bride away? The bride is not a possession to given to a man. Rather, since the couple bestows the sacrament to each other with priest as witness, our area is trying to promote the bride and groom walking in with the priest during the procession.
 
The more weddings we host, the more I find myself relaxing on things.

Our first daughter’s wedding, my husband and I paid for all of it. The groom’s parents offered to help. We said it wasn’t necessary and we appreciated them putting on the rehearsal dinner. We did not include their names on the invitations, not out of spite, but just because we were hosting. What I really cared about at the time was that no young children be allowed. It was an adult affair, black tie optional. I wasn’t up for the out of control kids that I’d seen at other weddings.

Daughter #2 got married and our first grandchild was born 10 days earlier. Mom of the baby was our first bride. She was matron of honor. Instead of carrying flowers down the aisle, she carried the baby. It was very sweet. We paid for this wedding, too. The groom’s parents paid for the rehearsal dinner.

Fast forward to now, daughter #3 is getting married in November. We have 5 grandchildren, the groom’s side has 3…all 8 will be in the wedding and I am ecstatic. They are between ages 1 and 7. Still black tie optional. I think there will be wrestling with the boys :rolleyes:…Once again, we are paying for the wedding. The groom’s parents are paying for the rehearsal dinner. My bride wanted the groom’s parents’ names on the invitation, and since it mattered to her it was fine with me. Their names are on.
Awww!

Very sweet.
 
I just looked up this idea of brides and grooms walking down the aisle. According to the sites I went on, the bride may come down unescorted. There is nothing about things being changed. All remains same before and after the 1970s. Only thing suggested was leave the kids out of the ceremony but that is just a suggestion. So where this came from…groom and bride coming down, no witnesses (you need two…the maid of honor and best man), no “giving bride away”, no Dad involvment, apparently is without credibility.

Try Roman Catholic Traditions, Catholic Wedding Traditions, and Catholic Digest. And I did note that parents are a part of the ceremony and to be honored.
 
This is inaccurate.

There is an option to have the bride escorted by her father or her parents in the processional, but the norm (liturgically, not culturally speaking) is for the bride and groom to process in together. Parents being involved in the actual liturgy of the wedding is not required.
You beat me to it…I didn’t read your post before I posted mind. 👍
 
Where is “here?”

(I’m in the US, and every Catholic wedding I’ve been to, including my own, had the bride and groom process in together, and this was encouraged during our wedding preparation. It was heavily emphasized in all our pre-Cana and wedding prep that the bride and the groom present themselves to be wed and exchange their own consent, not that anyone is “given away” by anyone else.)
This is awesome!!! I wish we knew about that when we were married. Now, we are old farts (well, middle aged farts) teaching pre-Cana.
 
If I meant “the majority of people” I would have said that.

I meant large absolute numbers, not a large percentage.

Anytime parents are invited, they are being included in the wedding, so they shouldn’t boohoo about it. Being invited is being included.
👍

Thank you for your continued great wisdom on several of these threads. And yes, I took your info on my presentation to heart…still very nervous.
 
Ok, so I went back and tried to answer the “fair” question, which isn’t a simple yes-no matter. With a wedding, it is best to assume that nothing ever is!
😃

I’ll tack that on, but meanwhile…
Easter Joy…what section of the country do you live? Because maybe we’re talking about different cultures. Don’t know.

Yes, I do agree that this should be discussed at the time of the engagement but I don’t know how a groom’s parents are to ask the bride “What are you paying for?”

Also, I asked you two question as what was fair or not fair and you neglected to respond to either.

I’ve had one incident concerning groom’s parents who were asked by the bride shortly after the engagement, “What are you paying for?” Hmmmm. The groom’s father, generous man who had paid the full bill for son’s education, asked the lad to lunch and said to him, “I owe you nothing.” He did not owe him a college education but gave it to him. From that education he was able to give his bride a very nice life style.

You did astutely predict that all these problems can have fallout with holidays etc. and the interaction with family. And you are right about that.
Let’s back up, because I’ve been answering this question from one side only and I think you’ve been answering it from a more all-inclusive point of view.

In the ideal world, the bride and groom first have a discussion about what they want and don’t want and what sort of compromises they’re OK with at the beginning, so that they can both have each other’s backs when all these things are decided. They tell each other what sort of concerns they have about their own parents. They point out the possible mine fields in the budding in-law relationship. They each know fairly well what is wanted by the other, what is important, what isn’t, and what is negotiable. They keep talking, which continues throughout their married life. They promise each other not to make any promises to anybody without some sensible period of reflection, even if it is only a day.

Having done this, they have a confidential talk separately with both sets of parents in which they ask the parents to disclose their expectations. If they’re wise, this won’t just be about money. This will be about what the parents think might be happening with regards to bridal attendants and down to the bride’s godmother Aunt Mabel hoping to be able to dish out the cake. Everything they can think of, leaving as few “I thought you knew…” landmines as possible. The bridal couple learns what level of participation their parents hope to have and what their expectations are. They feel out their parents emotions. This communication keeps happening sensitively and discretely on an on-going basis. Each adult child takes the point position in communicating with his or her own parents. The couple expresses everything in terms of “we have decided” or “we think we might want” rather than laying any desire on the back of just one of them.

The parents, meanwhile, realize that a) weddings take many forms these days, b) people go kind of nuts when it comes to putting on a wedding, and c) no matter what anybody says or pays, there is a limit to how much control they have over this function. Sometimes, these things take on a life of their own. The relationships they have with their adult child and their future in-laws are ultimately what is the most important.

All in all, the ideal is that no one concerns themselves with what is fair except to bend over backwards to make everyone else feel they’ve been treated fairly.

If there is ANY time that the following applies to the ultimate degree, it is when two families are putting on a wedding!!

If there is any encouragement in Christ, any solace in love, any participation in the Spirit, any compassion and mercy, complete my joy by being of the same mind, with the same love, united in heart, thinking one thing. Do nothing out of selfishness or out of vainglory; rather, humbly regard others as more important than yourselves, each looking out not for his own interests, but (also) everyone for those of others. Phil. 2:1-4

The only thing I would caution is to avoid being so humble that others do not know things about your hopes that they would want to know. Don’t say something does not matter to you when it does. That can be pride talking! Just remember when you tell others what you hope for to also be clear that you expect everyone will have to give in for such a happy and complicated day. You had your day as a bride or a groom, and within the prudent limits of your finances, your emotional and other capacities, and the number of hours you have at your disposal before the wedding day, you feel it is your turn to go to the background and do whatever is necessary to make this day a pleasure to all concerned.
 
Thank you for the support. I’m stunned that a parent’s sadness should be disregarded with the remark “they shouldn’t boohoo about it.” If she’s talking about either set of parents, it is really terrible. No one should gloat over someone, especially someone who loves you or your husband, who is feeling alone and left out.
In all fairness,I think Xantippe and I both had horrid “budding in” experiences. Also, none of us know the extent of the hurt that has taken place “both ways.” The parent’s sadness may not be justified. That was the case with my wedding. Too much drama. We called off the big wedding and moved it out of state.
 
I am trying to answer the “fair” question, but what you do not want to do at a wedding is to get too wrapped up in making sure that things are fair according to your lights. The repercussions of the battles you choose surrounding a wedding may easily be felt by someone for the rest of your life. Others may have hurt feelings that they carry for a long time, too. If you must choose a battle, choose VERY carefully!!
…You are the groom’s parents. The bride’s parents are doing the wedding you have not been consulted, fair enough, until they hand you the bill for your share. Hmmm. In the meantime, you and hubby were planning on holding the rehersal dinner, and maybe there is a $$ present coming. Now you are given half the wedding reception bill. Warm fuzzies? I don’t think so. And if you don’t pay up, no inclusion on invitation. Fair?
It is OK to include only those who are paying for the event as hosts, it is OK to include someone as an honorary host even though they paid nothing, but it is not OK to expect someone to foot the bill without recognizing their contribution. I would not do that. If it was avoidable–sometimes these cost overruns come after the invitations were ordered–I would say it is not a fair request at all. While it is “correct” to only include the actual hosts on the invitation, I also think it is crass to talk about it as if it were a quid pro quo. If you’re hosting a wedding, you’ve been given a place of honor. Drive responsibly.

More to the point of this example, if I were given half the bill for the reception, I’d be politely asking about how we were planning on dividing the expense of the rehearsal dinner. I might be pleased to find that the bride’s parents were planning to pay for a catered BBQ in their own backyard, at no expense to our side of the family. You don’t want to be caught expecting the worst of your new DIL’s parents!! :eek:

If we were saddled with an unfair portion of the expenses for our son’s wedding, however–since sons are what we actually have–and could not get it righted without causing some big drama, we’d just eat it for his sake and for his wife’s sake, if that was something we could swing. We wouldn’t probably be saintly enough to do it without our son’s knowledge–he needs to know why we may not be helping out if they need help early in their marriage–but we’d tell him to chalk it up to temporary wedding insanity and let it go. We do have to co-grandparent with these people. It’s a bit early to be making enemies.
Second scenario, as per OP, there are financial bumps happening in groom’s family. Bride’s family went ahead and made arrangements never consulting groom’s family about any part of the gala but want them to pay half. Fair?
What is fair is for the groom’s family to say that they are very sorry that the bride’s family made these arrangements without talking to them first, because they can’t contribute that much. The groom’s family has the “out” that they are not traditionally expected to pay for the wedding at all. If they are not asked, they do not have to offer. If they don’t offer, they don’t have any responsibility to pay. Even if they did offer to pay, they do not need to feel bound to pay a bit more than offered.

This is where you have a serious talk with your son about defending your boundaries firmly when you have to do that. (It is also where you REALLY wish you’d made yourself clear about this right up front, so he would have made it clear to his bride and her family right up front, before they jumped to this unfortunate conclusion.) What you decide to do depends very much on the talk you have with him, how bad this “bump” is, and how the two of you decide the overall situation needs to be decided. Your decision, but do get his (name removed by moderator)ut, because you and he do have to live with these people all the way through the funerals. You have to look for that balance between prudent boundaries and a generous willingness to compromise early on. (You have to live with these people, but that doesn’t mean you have to agree to allow your life to be run by them…prudence is in finding the right road, not the one the farthest to the right or the farthest to the left.)

As I like to say: Life is not fair. Life is good, and it probably can’t be both at the same time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top