What Black Lives Matter Believe

  • Thread starter Thread starter Paddy1989
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
.

To suggest that it’s all going to be solved by evangelisation is not a practical solution at this point. A worthy endeavour no doubt. But far from a solution to the hard core problems we see.

I don’t want you to view this as me bashing the Catholic religion, but if you think that evangelisation would work then we need to note that almost 50% of Catholics have no problem with abortion. That 22% of women in the US call themselves Catholic but 24% of all abortions are carried out on Catholics (Catholics are just as likely to get an abortion as other U.S. women. Why? | America Magazine). A third of Catholics have been divorced. A vast majority of Catholic women have used or are using contraceptives.

Now if the church’s teachings don’t work on a significant proportion of Catholics themselves then I wouldn’t hold out much hope for it to have any success whatsoever in urban ghettoes.

But I get the feeling that this is your only solution. I appreciate that you now see that there are problems to be fixed. And maybe you can see why so many people are protesting the conditions under which so many Americans live. It isn’t just a protest about police brutality. That was the catalyst. And it’s not some left wing Marxist plot. Apart from a tiny percentage of people who are using this situation for self serving reasons, almost everyone, in countries across the world, have taken the killing of one man as a symbol that change is needed.
[/quote]

If that were true then how was it that Black communities had less crime and even in some cases better education than when they weren’t funded very well at all in the 30s and 40s and racism was embedded in law? Back then 25% of Children were born out of wedlock, today it’s over 70%. Thomas Sowell describes this, ill put a link in below. it’s worth a look


Absolutely there are many people who subscribe to being Catholic but who reject it’s teachings with the likes of Abortion and divorce etc. The lesson to learn there is that evangelization doesn’t stop, we must be converted everyday and OBEY Christ and his teachings and not fall away, those that reject Church teaching have fallen away, we hope they will come back and many do, i mean i did and i came home :). The problem with Church teaching in todays society is that it can be hard to live up in a society FULL of temptation but it is required for our own salvation in this world and the next.

**How effective Church teaching today is among the number of Catholics practicing it does not prove or disprove it’s validity, we use reason for that. It’s not a numbers game, many Catholics including all of society may reject Christ, that doesn’t make this truth less valid. The reality is if Catholics didn’t fall away from their faith and if society adopted it then the conditions would be set for society to progress economically and socially aswell. We can see that throughout history, thats the beauty of it

You know Catholicism started in the ghettos, it’s rebirth may just begin there once more
 
Last edited:
40.png
MarkRome:
Yep. And the problem is that you cannot argue that you believe black lives matter yet point out that you are against Black Lives Matter the organization without being accused of racism. It is very sinister.
I see quite a few people trying to explain the difference in supporting an organisation and supporting the protesters. But I’ve seen no-one who decries the organisation being called racist. Can you point that out for me?
40.png
MarkRome:
Yep. And the problem is that you cannot argue that you believe black lives matter yet point out that you are against Black Lives Matter the organization without being accused of racism. It is very sinister.
Exactly and thats the how many of the left work today…
Again, can you point out an example of this?
Well for example speakers like Bob Woodson and Larry Elder being referred to as an Oreo or Uncle Tom’s by those on the left just because they hold a different position and don’t but into the narrative. This is actually from white people by the way, i mean talk about trying to stand on the fence against racism and then call a black person white for not buying into their narrative. It’s all so patronizing, i mean the left today now feel they get to dictate who is white or black the same way someone can decide what gender they are. “If you have a problem figuring out whether you’re for me or Trump, then you ain’t black.” Joe Biden


One could even argue that the racism is actually from the left bullying others who don’t subscribe to their ideologies.
 
Last edited:
40.png
Freddy:
40.png
MarkRome:
Yep. And the problem is that you cannot argue that you believe black lives matter yet point out that you are against Black Lives Matter the organization without being accused of racism. It is very sinister.
I see quite a few people trying to explain the difference in supporting an organisation and supporting the protesters. But I’ve seen no-one who decries the organisation being called racist. Can you point that out for me?
40.png
MarkRome:
Yep. And the problem is that you cannot argue that you believe black lives matter yet point out that you are against Black Lives Matter the organization without being accused of racism. It is very sinister.
Exactly and thats the how many of the left work today…
Again, can you point out an example of this?
Well for example speakers like Bob Woodson and Larry Elder…
That has zero to do with BLM. It was specifically claimed that people who opposed the organisation itself were being called racist. Again I will ask, please show me an example.
 
You know Catholicism started in the ghettos, it’s rebirth may just begin there once more.
At least you have realised that there are problems worth bringing to everyone’s attention. Not just police brutality. So you keep evangelising (how’s that going so far in the Minneapolis ghettos any way? Keep us posted on your progress) and leave the practical problems to the rest of us.
 
40.png
Paddy1989:
You know Catholicism started in the ghettos, it’s rebirth may just begin there once more.
At least you have realised that there are problems worth bringing to everyone’s attention. Not just police brutality. So you keep evangelising (how’s that going so far in the Minneapolis ghettos any way? Keep us posted on your progress) and leave the practical problems to the rest of us.
You see now you have regressed again, just when i thought we were getting somewhere. If you find fathers sticking around impractical then your in for one turbulent future my friend. I’m going to keep evangelizing the best way i know i can while others who are able to do so through their higher level of intellect and scope can do so much more effectively such as the likes of Bishop Barron who already reach millions of people

We ALL recognize the problems, the difference is that BLM and others on the left blame white privilege for these problems while i’m pointing out we can blame no-one but ourselves for these problems. The solution is common sense looking at history. I mean i’m sure you have some understanding of western history and the world-view that shaped it after the fall of Rome. How that world-view effectively led to the establishment of the university system, hospital system, orphanages and helped shaped the political, economical and social conditions that resulted from it. Social justice, human rights, labor rights etc.

It would be foolish to think that the very ethos that built western civilization could just be pulled away and society would remain the same or could even flourish. Actually i remember reading a good article on this years ago, i saved it as i find it’s satire quite well done. It’s called how to destroy western civilization without spilling your latte. It essentially lays out the point i’m making in a more effective way, it’s a quick read

 
Last edited:
40.png
Paddy1989:
40.png
Freddy:
40.png
MarkRome:
Yep. And the problem is that you cannot argue that you believe black lives matter yet point out that you are against Black Lives Matter the organization without being accused of racism. It is very sinister.
I see quite a few people trying to explain the difference in supporting an organisation and supporting the protesters. But I’ve seen no-one who decries the organisation being called racist. Can you point that out for me?
40.png
MarkRome:
Yep. And the problem is that you cannot argue that you believe black lives matter yet point out that you are against Black Lives Matter the organization without being accused of racism. It is very sinister.
Exactly and thats the how many of the left work today…
Again, can you point out an example of this?
Well for example speakers like Bob Woodson and Larry Elder…
That has zero to do with BLM. It was specifically claimed that people who opposed the organisation itself were being called racist. Again I will ask, please show me an example.
Well i give you an example as these speakers have been abused by those claiming to support BLM, also i have aswell, i’ve been told that i have white privilege and that my views were racist by a few other Irish Republicans who i have discussed this with, they are all leftists by the way. I’m sure many posters on here who have voiced their opinions about this in public may have suffered the same fate, people are getting sacked from their jobs from criticizing the movement, surely your not naive enough to not see this all around you
 
Last edited:
Black American men shouldn’t be targeted for police violence 2.5-3 times more
They’re not.
It was specifically claimed that people who opposed the organisation itself were being called racist. Again I will ask, please show me an example.
Do you use twitter? There are many examples of this, but Candace Owens is probably one of the best ones currently. She gets a lot of accusations of racism thrown at her and constant abuse in general for being a black conservative. She is completely against the Black Lives Matter movement. If you put #CandaceOwens into twitter you will see some of this abuse.

Here is a particularly nasty one, with a twitter user calling her a white supremacist with a video clip portraying her as a KKK member.

https://twitter.com/Benjam(name removed by moderator)Dixon/status/1268502584668626944?s=20
 
I see quite a few people trying to explain the difference in supporting an organisation and supporting the protesters. But I’ve seen no-one who decries the organisation being called racist. Can you point that out for me?
Timothy Gordon.
 
40.png
Freddy:
40.png
Paddy1989:
40.png
Freddy:
40.png
MarkRome:
Yep. And the problem is that you cannot argue that you believe black lives matter yet point out that you are against Black Lives Matter the organization without being accused of racism. It is very sinister.
I see quite a few people trying to explain the difference in supporting an organisation and supporting the protesters. But I’ve seen no-one who decries the organisation being called racist. Can you point that out for me?
40.png
MarkRome:
Yep. And the problem is that you cannot argue that you believe black lives matter yet point out that you are against Black Lives Matter the organization without being accused of racism. It is very sinister.
Exactly and thats the how many of the left work today…
Again, can you point out an example of this?
Well for example speakers like Bob Woodson and Larry Elder…
That has zero to do with BLM. It was specifically claimed that people who opposed the organisation itself were being called racist. Again I will ask, please show me an example.
Well i give you an example…
No, no-one has given any examples of someone specifically attacking the organisation BLM and being called racist. If you have an example then post it. Or say that you were wrong to claim it. Your credibility requires it.
 
They’re not.
They are.
Common courtesy to insert a link?
Thank you. That wasn’t hard, was it? Your link says nothing to support your claim about unarmed white citizens, but it does take readers to this page, which provides much more insight and context into the data. You need to look at data per capita. Black people will kill more white people simply because there are a lot more white people in the country. White people kill more white people, too. In fact, that’s the overwhelming majority of homicides with white victims. This county, (if you haven’t noticed), has a lot of white people.

Can you explain to us why you’re so angry? What’s your dog in the fight? Is BLM directly harming your nuclear family somehow
And here’s a link where you can tell him he was wasting his time because there actually is no problem: https://www.romney.senate.gov/contact

Let us know what he thinks of you and your views if you could.
Better yet, he could contact our bishops and clergy with the same missive. More Catholic bishops, laity join in ‘Black Lives Matter’ protests | America Magazine
 
I think this is how I see it. I don’t support BLM as an organization. They lump things together I definitely don’t agree with. However the peaceful protests I think bring attention to a much too neglected topic. I think it’s ok to separate the movement from the organization.I’m absolutely against violent protests. Looting stores in the very communities your protesting for is counterproductive.

One thing that does concern me is an attitude that if you don’t join the protest or go into lock step with BLM your a racist, unwoke, a dinosaur, etc. And that is often done in a public shaming way. I see some using this as an excuse to engage in some pretty convenient self righteous behaviors. I’ve also heard “if your silent your complicit”. That sounds pretty dangerous to me, sometimes that’s true, but a lot of people don’t buck the system. I’ve stood up to things on occasion in the course of every day life I thought were pretty unjust. It was not well received by a very large portion of people. I think it’s helpful to look at “me first“. Ie what biases might I have? Where have I sinned?

I think there are many productive approaches to this problem. But I also hope to see a sustained productive effort. I think these issues are going to need that in order to resolve. We can’t get ADD about it in three months.
 
What an extremely balanced and well-thought out position you have!

Now brace yourself for thirty different people who will reply and tell you why you’re wrong…
 
Fact Check!

The Daily Wire

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes.
As opposed to what? 'strongly bias liberal causes that through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes.

I can turn that around and say the same for the opposite side. Bias?
 
If you’re using the site I think you are, they listed Radio Vatican as ‘propaganda’ and ‘pseudoscience’. Hardly a reputable source, that site.
 
I can turn that around and say the same for the opposite side. Bias?
I agree that all media have their biases, we all have, but deliberate misinformation is wrong, Left or Right. I think all media should be fact checked. I don’t know how such a thing could be implemented, but deliberate misinformation is dangerous to our democratic society.
 
there are many good-hearted people fighting racism and appropriately protesting.
However, the hypocrisy practiced by those looking to generate chaos and their cooperators in the elite media are damaging.

These people don’t have the best interests of humanity at heart, they are scoring political points. And it should be disgusting that the murder of George Floyd is used by rich white people to score in the polls.

One prime example of this rank hypocrisy.
Vigil keepers at our area abortion clinic are allowed to walk on the public sidewalk. You dare not step on the blacktop or the local police are immediately on you. Anyone getting remotely loud is photographed and asked by the police to tone it down.
There is zero media positivity toward these vigil keepers, rather than are portrayed as dumb and nasty Christians.
So really, why should abortion clinics be ransacked, given the ethical standards employed by our virtue signallers??? That should be ok in the dystopian worldview of CNN.
But no. Let’s be hypocrites.

And this, which is a disgusting evidence of the kind of ethical standards employed by our elite media:

 
they are being used as a proxy by the ultra left.
So let me get this straight…the “ultra left” is somehow (magic?) able to mobilize protests in all 50 states and most major countries. And not just for a day, for what, 10 days now? That’s very impressive. If they have that sort of power, why are they bothering with all this protest nonsense? Why not just give orders to all the gov. around the world?

This is a variant of something you hear constantly: On the one hand, the far right (I might as well join in the name calling) is constantly telling us that the gov. is inefficient, incompetent, corrupt, etc. etc. Then in the next breath they claim that certain elements of the gov. (“deep state,” whatever) are all-powerful. Which is it? [I’ll give you a hint–it’s neither.]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top