T
tgm21234
Guest
Here is a web-site all you book lovers may be interested in.
shelfari.com/
shelfari.com/
Yea I like the book so far but I didn’t care too much for how the Overlords that came down were able to “prove” the truth behind all of the world’s religions and their origins and therefore most people gave up on their spiritual beliefs. Although it didn’t specifically say that Christianity was one of them you have to assume it would have been one of them. Anyways I like where it is going now in that once these things (faith, spirituality ect) are destroyed in the human everything starts to break down. True utopias, no matter what, cannot keep people happy all the time.Ooh-- Childhood’s End! Read it more than 30 years ago, still remember it well.
One of Clark’s most thoughtful and challenging.
Childhoods End rocked. I didn’t like his pimping his flavor of Zen though.Ooh-- Childhood’s End! Read it more than 30 years ago, still remember it well.
One of Clark’s most thoughtful and challenging.
I have read Atlas and Fountainhead. They are incredible books and Rand is an incredible author. I think we can all agree that extreme objectivism is abhorrent. But, as I think you suggest, let’s not throw the baby out with the bathwater. Obviously, in contrast to Rand’s POV, altruism is good.Then you must also read Anthem. If you have not already done so of course…Both books are much shorter than Atlas Shrugged and The Fountainhead but convey a lot of the same thought.
Opps, I read backwards.
Not all of objectivism is abhorrent. While some parts are in direct conflict with Catholic Faith and Practice, the idea that it is not selfish to be able to keep what belongs to one and use it as one sees fit is a very old idea. Rand distinguishes between choosing to give way what one has, as through charity, and having it taken through force by government.
But I live with a philosopher (married to one in fact, a real neo-aristolean). I get to see the best and the worst of philosophies. I can’t stand Derrida.
I have read Atlas and Fountainhead. They are incredible books and Rand is an incredible author. I think we can all agree that extreme objectivism is abhorrent. But, as I think you suggest, let’s not throw the baby out with the bathwater. Obviously, in contrast to Rand’s POV, altruism is good.
But she does have much truth in what she writes. I think Francisco’s money speech is incredible. I don’t agree with all of it philosophically but there is truth there IMHO.
I am a Platonist but I don’t agree with everything he wrote. I love Augustine but he causes me great pain sometimes. Balance is important.
Living with a philosopher has to be very interesting.
I’m being lured by Wittgenstein at the moment.
I remember years ago, maybe it was on the program Firing Line, or I read it somewhere, that Ann Rand told William F. Buckley that he was too intelligent to believe in God.
As much as I appreciate her writing she surely falls short on the big questions. I’ve seen her interviewed and she seemed a little prickly. I bet spending some time with her would have been fascinating though.I remember years ago, maybe it was on the program Firing Line, or I read it somewhere, that Ann Rand told William F. Buckley that he was too intelligent to believe in God.
I once read a quote of hers to the effect that she was self sufficient, therefore needed no God. She never seemed particularly dogmatic about it, more disinterested and unconvinced than actively hostile to the concept of God.As much as I appreciate her writing she surely falls short on the big questions. I’ve seen her interviewed and she seemed a little prickly. I bet spending some time with her would have been fascinating though.
I am very happy for you. The first time I read Father Elijah was such a wonderful experience. I remember one night there was a storm and the wind was blowing and I was just reading and reading and reading…“Father Elijah” by Michael O’Brien and am fascinated! Already read “Eclipse of the Sun” of his and loved it. I know I’m not reading them in order but that’s been the order I’ve found them
I never heard of the book, but I will look it up on Amazon. Thanks for the heads up,I am very happy for you. The first time I read Father Elijah was such a wonderful experience. I remember one night there was a storm and the wind was blowing and I was just reading and reading and reading…
Interesting book. It is actually kind of…err…not dense…but…let’s say that there aren’t any throwaway sentences. Some wonderfully insightful writing. But it somehow flows almost as if it’s an adventure or mystery novel.
Originally Posted by NPS
I am very happy for you. The first time I read Father Elijah was such a wonderful experience. I remember one night there was a storm and the wind was blowing and I was just reading and reading and reading…
Interesting book. It is actually kind of…err…not dense…but…let’s say that there aren’t any throwaway sentences. Some wonderfully insightful writing. But it somehow flows almost as if it’s an adventure or mystery novel.
It’s hard for me to imagine a “reading Catholic” not enjoying that book. I think I first heard about it here on the forums. People kept saying good things about it and I finally bought it. That and “Montanaman” probably said something about it at around the same time. That made for a pretty reliable combo.I never heard of the book, but I will look it up on Amazon. Thanks for the heads up,
Never heard of it, but I will look it up on Amazon. THANKSI’m about ready to start “Wizard’s first rule.” Anyone else read this yet?
I tried reading Ayn Rand’s “The Virtue Of Selfishness” back in 1970, having heard accolades about Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged. I didn’t like any of them. The Childrens’ Blizzard is next on my list.As much as I appreciate her writing she surely falls short on the big questions. I’ve seen her interviewed and she seemed a little prickly. I bet spending some time with her would have been fascinating though.
I believe he is.I just picked up a copy of John Dominic Crossans Jesus, a Revolutionary Biography. He’s the guy on the History Channel a lot. If I remember right ( and I’m not sure that I do) he seemed rather anti-Catholic?