Hello Bob,
When the Schism occurred, Peter was with the West.
No, Peter was in heaven looking at the mess two Cardinals***** made of Christian unity. These two “ministers without portfolio” caused the schism in 1054AD, removing their church from the communion.
But we cannot return to a church like it was in 1053AD, God spare us from that! Because we were on the cusp of schism, and we would be right back at it once again. We need to return to the First Millennium church.
***** It may also be of interest to you to know that there was no bishop in the Apostolic See of Rome at the time Cardinals Frederic and Humbert ran amuck in Constantinople and started the schism, in the west no one was in charge!
The East claims that no council has been valid since the Schism and therefore the Church has been hamstrung ever since while the West has acted like the Church acted before the Schism.
What you are referring to are local Councils of the west. These are not like the Seven Councils for several important reasons:
First of all, the western church claims only a Pope can call a Council. In reality the Popes never called any of the original Councils and did not chair them.
Secondly, the Pope claims a “line item” veto power over the findings of Councils, and can declare entire sessions invalid. In the Seven Councils everyone got just one vote, that includes the legates of the see of Rome.
Thirdly, western local Councils have too often been used as platforms to introduce new theology. That was not the focus of intent of the Seven Councils.
Please remember that the Seven Ecumenical Councils were called primarily to meet the challenge of new heresies, and the work of these councils was not of building new dogmas, but paring back and trimming out heretical ideas. The whole focus was different, the Seven Councils were conservative affairs, dominated by
apophatic reasoning. The intent was to
preserve the faith once received, to keep it inviolate.
The local western Councils of the second millennium have been primarily cataphatic affairs, introducing new concepts with eagerness. The western church in more recent centuries has an entirely different way of looking at theology than the early Fathers, convinced that some how they can learn more things about God than was left to us through the Apostles.
Sometimes westerners look with hopefulness to the declaration of new dogmas. The early church defined doctrine only with extreme reluctance, used negative reasoning and put most of it’s energy into restraining the innovators.
Even today, there are Roman Catholic factions lobbying for new dogmas, and they cannot see a problem with it!
The East doesn’t seem to be as concerned as the West about Unity.
Of course it is!
The question of Unity is vital!!!
I agree.
"That they may be one as We are One so the WORLD WILL KNOW THAT YOU HAVE SENT ME!!! The World doesn’t know that Christ is sent by the Father because we are no longer ONE!! God help us, PLEASE!! bob mck
I appreciate your sentiments and earnest plea, I really do!
What does unity mean to you?
To different people it means different things. One cannot have a RE-union until one knows what the union was originally like. The answer to that may surprise you.
There are different models to the concept of “church”. The model that has evolved is the one from the west. The early church was structured differently than the modern Roman Catholic church. It was based upon intercommunion between local autocephalic churches which shared a common theology. That is still the model followed by the Orthodox today.
All that is necessary for reconciliation between us is for the Papacy to return to the original model.
To quote (once again) Cardinal Ratzinger:
Rome must not require more from the East with respect to the doctrine of primacy than had been formulated and was lived in the first millennium.
[Joseph Ratzinger, *Principles of Catholic Theology (San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press]
I see the Pope really understands this but it will take a lot, perhaps even intervention of the Holy Ghost, for the rank and file Roman Catholics to come to understand this as well.
Pax et Bonum,