L
Latin
Guest
God bless you Abucs and God bless every readers of the CAF.Sophia:
God created us all to be good if we so accept it. That qualifier is the part that you are not understanding. He doesn’t make us robots but creatures of free will who have the power to reject Him.Could the Virgin Mary become an evil person by choosing to become evil? Obviously not, since to be “good” is the rejection of evil - not just the practicing of evil, but even considering evil, and much less “willing” to become evil.
God created her to be “good”. Did she have “free will”? Obviously yes. So God (or any omnipotent and omniscient creator) can create good people right off the bat, without forcing them to go through “hoops” of learning. Someone might say that Mary was a “special case”, and even God could not create another fundamentally good and incorruptible person, even if he wanted to. But that would be another denial of God’s omnipotence. There is no logical necessity of having only one incorruptible person.
This argument is also based upon catholic teaching. Reject it at your own peril.
I don’t agree with your above qualifier.
.
I present you Abucs two qualifiers.
- God’s offer to Eternal Life in heaven coming TOTALLY from God’s decision, it is an offer that NO ONE reject and they are ALL end up in heaven.
- God’s offer to Eternal Life in heaven coming TOTALLY from God’s decision, it is an offer that NO ONE CAN reject and they are ALL end up in heaven.
Please Abucs guess which one is correct qualifier according to Catholic Soteriology, 1. or 2. or both as there is no practical difference between the two?
.
God bless you Abucs and God bless every readers of the CAF.
Latin
Last edited: