C
CaptCrunch73
Guest
Speaking as someone who was raised Catholic, left the Catholic Church for an Evangelical Church for years and then returned home I’ll agree with you that there is a lot of scripture twisting going on but I think the agreement ends there.Of course I know that there are explainations to get around it but to interprete Jesus as saying that Peter is the foundation of the church as opposed to He Himself is flipping things no matter how you twist the scripture to fit the logic.
Herein lies the problem with the Reformation. You say Peter is not the Rock, Catholics say Peter is the Rock. How does this issue get resolved?
Catholics can go to the Catholic Church and get an answer. Non Catholics rely on private interpretation of scripture. And what does the Bible say about private interpretation of scripture?
Catholics are one big (albeit dysfunctional) family. Protestants disagree with Catholics and disagree amongst themselves. Looking at Sacred Scripture as a whole which community sounds like the one described in scripture? Is it the one big dysfunctional family or is it the one where everyone is debating doctrine? (Hint: Read Acts 15 about the Council of Jerusalem.)
Given the choice of taking the first 1500 years of the Christian Church or the 500 years following the Reformation I’m going with the first 1500 years…
May God bless you on your journey.