D
dzheremi
Guest
That is the key, my friend. Muslims get to decide who is “peaceful”, and so, who gets to have any rights. If we deny Muhammad’s prophethood or deny that the Qur’an is the truth, then we are no longer considered “peaceful” and your stupid Islamic “justice” systems allow for all kinds of terrible things to happen to us for which we have no recourse. You KNOW this is true. Or do you not know what happens in countries like Pakistan to people charged with “blasphemy” under laws that make it a crime to insult Muhammad or the Qur’an? I’ll tell you what happens: They are put in jail for an indeterminate amount of time, killed by lynch mobs, etc. And the vast majority of cases do not actually involve any sort of blasphemy, but are motivated by personal disputes and distrust of religious minorities!dzhereme, there are no voilent verses in the Quran for the peaceful people. Any one may believe in islam or refuse to believe, there is no harm as long he does not take up arms against islam
Akhbar S. Ahmed:
Anwar Masih, a Christian from Samundri in Punjab, has been in detention since February 1993 when a Muslim shopkeeper alleged that Masih insulted the prophet during an argument over money.
Roman Catholic Bishop John Joseph, a Pakistani human rights campaigner, had been leading a campaign against the blasphemy law and said he felt he was getting nowhere when he took his own life on May 6, 1998. He had failed to find a lawyer willing to take the case of convicted blasphemer Ayub Massih, a Christian.Massih’s family had applied to a government program that gives housing plots to landless people. The local landlords, who brought the allegations against him, resented this because landless Christians work in their fields in exchange for a place to live. By getting a plot of land Massih would have escaped his bondage.
“Most of these cases,” concludes Amnesty International in its latest report on Pakistan, “are motivated not by the blasphemous actions of the accused, but by hostility toward members of minority communities, compounded by personal enmity, professional jealousy or economic rivalry.” (link)
“The wrong side of the warring parties”? Interesting…and again, completely defined by whatever Muslim cares to define it. Am I on the “wrong” side of the war if I stick to my Christian principles? It would seem that I am. Because Muhammad is a false prophet and the Qur’an is not the word of God and Islam is not the true religion, and these things are true in peace-time and in war-time. In many places in the Muslim world, I would risk my life by saying such things.That was during war time. It was an open war against Islam evey where, from the Romans as well as the Persians. It was necessary to know about the friend or foe. To make them low or to subjugate them is a natural result of being on the wrong side of the warring parties.
“Protection” from WHO, exactly? From MUSLIMS! Duh.The people of the book did not accept Islam but remained on their own faith and tried not to take part in the war. So Jizyah was imposed as an indication that they were under the protection of the Muslims so that nobody harms them.
That’s disgusting. You make me sick sometimes, Planten. But I know it is not really your fault. You are giving an Islamically prescribed answer here.That is enough to prove that they were on a lower status. However bad they may feel.
Or it WOULD be a great work, if that were true, which it isn’t. What happened, for instance, when the Muslim mobs destroyed parts of the Abu Fana monastery in Egypt only a little while ago? It was ostensibly a “land dispute”, but still some Muslims kidnapped the monks, tortured them, and tried to force them to convert to Islam. That is an odd thing to do in a “land dispute”, don’t you think? And they were the lucky ones, those monks! They were only tortured! Others, like our beloved Chaldean martyrs Fr. Ghanni and Archibishop Rahho of Iraq were given the same “choice” by some awful terrorists, and they were killed for not becoming Muslims! So how the hell can you really believe what you have written here? Do you not know the history of the Levant? Do you not know, for instance, how even during the Ottoman period the jaziya that you claim is to protect minorities was extracted from the Maronite people of Mt. Lebanon (for instance) in the most terrible way, that essentially FORCED them to convert through economic subjugation and physical torture? They were beaten if they did not give enough in tribute, Planten. Literally beaten. I can find the references for you, if you don’t believe it. Then you can tell me, please, what “war” against Islam was happening in the Ottoman empire that would have justified that. (I’ll save you the trouble: There wasn’t one. Islam just does that anyway.)It is a great good work of Islam that the people of the book did not need to become Muslims and they were allowed to continue on their own faith and they were not liable to be killed.