Y
YourNameHere
Guest
Actually just the opposite. We see the commies are good at sticking to the working man. If wages do not go up, eventually we will have the same situation in this country that they do in Red China.
This is an example of a false dichotomy fallacy.If small business owners must stick it to workers through low wages, then perhaps they need to go out of business.
Driving businesses out of the country, thus losing employment opportunity in this country, is not the answer.Hypotheticals always sound great. The real world, not so much. Take your widget factory to China or some other communist country where they have many slave laborers.
One of the unfortunate side effects of women entering into the work place in large numbers is that few employers now see themselves as in any way responsible for the needs of their employees. Our whole society is geared towards two income families. I do not want to go back where women have limited employment options.I actually work at two jobs, and so do each of my daughters and my son-in-law. My husband is the only slacker who only has one job but he works very hard at his job and there is a lot of competition in his field and a lot of pressure for old-timers to retire if they can’t keep up. He keeps up and is very intelligent, and also very personable and good with customer service.
That’s far too simplistic to be meaningful. Some small businesses will be disadvantaged, to be sure, some may even close. By the same token, much of the Western world is now suffering a serious demographic shift which means wage pressures are upward. To my mind, if a business cannot afford to pay a fair wage, defined by statute and/or by market, then the business model they have is inherently flawed. Perhaps it simply means that the business is not viable, and relying on low wages to maintain profitability means, quite frankly, that it is not a viable business.Exactly. And when you keep increasing the minimum wage, you put small businesses out if business.
No businesses, no jobs. And considering around 75% of the job makers in the US are small businesses, the more burden you put on them, the less jobs, and less tax revenue you will have. It’s all pretty simple economics.
The market makes sure that those with bad ideas and bad services or products have outcomes which are negative. As it should be.The market is not some sort of a god that makes sure all outcomes are positive.
Well… we don’t want people living in their cars. Five dollars an hour isn’t very far from exploiting some woman from Angola to become a household slave. Desperate people will do anything to survive, but that doesn’t mean it isn’t exploitation. Greed, avarice, that’s the problem.If the agreed upon wage is less than $5, what is the problem?
Do you imaging people aren’t being hired under the table for below minimum wage?If there were no national minimum wage, some people would try to hire folks to work for less than $5 an hour.
And that would be a perfect fit for the two of you. However your scenario is not typical. A minimum wage, something we have had for quite a while, under which western civilization continued to prosper, is there to prevent exploitation.I would be happy to work for $5 an hour, if I was doing $5 an hour work.
My husband is the major breadwinner, my income simply supplements his