What We Have Lost & the Road to Restoration

  • Thread starter Thread starter paramedicgirl
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
A lie is DELIBERATE knowledge that one is distorting truth. I had been misinformed and stated it in innocence. It had been withdrawn almost immediately, well before you noted that I had done so.

I do check things, and that’s when I observed it. The problem is that the person who told me is very credible and I had no reason to doubt it was true.
 
Well, your view on the use of Latin is un-Catholic and at variance with Vatican II, of all things.

Catholicism rests on Sacred Scripture AND Sacred Tradition. Remember that.
i am not sure i can agree with you considering the original catholic church did not speak latin in their masses. that came later. i am sure the churches in corinth and ephesus didn’t speak latin in their liturgies.
 
A lie is DELIBERATE knowledge that one is distorting truth. I had been misinformed and stated it in innocence. It has been withdrawn.
Too late, for all the public damage you have done. Thanks for maligning me like that. And I noticed you didn’t bother to apologize. Very un -Christian of you, don’t you think?
 
A lie is DELIBERATE knowledge that one is distorting truth. I had been misinformed and stated it in innocence. It has been withdrawn.
in innocece??? you stated something about a fellow poster that you heard second hand with out making sure what you stated was FACT!
there are copies of your post (the one in question)… there was no innocence in it…but then that is my 2cents!
 
in innocece??? you stated something about a fellow poster that you heard second hand with out making sure what you stated was FACT!
there are copies of your post (the one in question)… there was no innocence in it…but then that is my 2cents!
It’s OK Karin, let’s just all hug and kiss, then we’ll sit in a circle and hold hands, singing Khum By Ya :rolleyes:
 
You have fallen into the (common) error of archaeologism: what the ā€œoriginalā€ Catholic Church did = what we should be doing, or, perhaps, if they didn’t do it, we shouldn’t do it. Archaeologism, plain and simple.

Whether you like it or not, Latin is the language of our Rite. A vernacular Mass can only be offered by Indult, that is, exception to the norm. Latin is the norm of our Rite.

Latin needs no defense, no justification, no ā€œpermissionā€.

Latin is the language of our Rite…a simple fact, notwithstanding anyone who disagrees.
 
Malign? Many are proud to say they are SSPX. There was no harm done to you personally, Pmg. The post lasted one minute and the public are well aware by now that it was an innocent mistake. Why publicize it further? Judging another’s motives is just as bad as making the error, is it not?

I have been ridiculed constantly with people calling me a charismatic and protestant. The problem there is that these people do state it without innocence, and with malintent.
 
Malign? Many are proud to say they are SSPX. There was no harm done to you personally, Pmg. The post lasted one minute and the public are well aware by now that it was an innocent mistake. Why publicize it further? Judging another’s motives is just as bad as making the error, is it not?
There is no harm done in lying about another person being SSPX? On these forums, SSPX are maligned constantly. I love the Pope, I love the Church, and I am not SSPX. How dare you think there was no harm done. Get out of my thread, Joysong. You are not welcome.
 
malign: badmouth: speak unfavorably about; evil or harmful in nature or influence

I personalyl would of gone with this word…

***slander: ***words falsely spoken that damage the reputation of another
 
If people dont want others to attack any Catholic Mass than may I suggest that Bishops, Priests, and us the common man stop the abuses of the Mass that seem to be going on very frequently in many Parishes!
I do not know a SINGLE Catholic that does not want the abuses to end, but that is a far cry from the outright DISDAIN for the Holy Mass I just read on the Ave Maria blog (tradcath-marilena.blogspot.com/) the OP saw fit to ā€œtip her hatā€ to. ā€œAveā€, indeed…

Peace to us all.
 
I do not know a SINGLE Catholic that does not want the abuses to end, but that is a far cry from the outright DISDAIN for the Holy Mass I just read on the Ave Maria blog (tradcath-marilena.blogspot.com/) the OP saw fit to ā€œtip her hatā€ to. ā€œAveā€, indeed…

Peace to us all.
Just for the record, in the blogging world, when you take some information from another blog and post it on your own, you do the hat tip. It means you are not stealing their information to post as your own.
 
Even though there are a few errors in the video, there are many valid points. The video plays speak for themselves of priests treating the Mass as though it is entertainment.
You know how Jesus says to Peter ā€œupon this rock I will build my church and the gates of hell will not prevail against itā€?
Would this stuff fall into that category or not, meaning, are these changes signaling the devil’s influence in the CC?
 
I do not know a SINGLE Catholic that does not want the abuses to end, but that is a far cry from the outright DISDAIN for the Holy Mass I just read on the Ave Maria blog (tradcath-marilena.blogspot.com/) the OP saw fit to ā€œtip her hatā€ to. ā€œAveā€, indeed…

Peace to us all.
saw fit to tip her hat to her…for bringing these things to her and others attention, indeed…what is wrong with that? Should we hide or sweep the abuses in the back of the closet or under the rug?
 
I do not know a SINGLE Catholic that does not want the abuses to end, but that is a far cry from the outright DISDAIN for the Holy Mass I just read on the Ave Maria blog (tradcath-marilena.blogspot.com/) the OP saw fit to ā€œtip her hatā€ to. ā€œAveā€, indeed…

Peace to us all.
Hat tip is a blogging term.

Now the problem is that anytime something is brought up from the SSPX, it’s dismissed without discussion.

Now we can discuss.
If you want to discuss the video, cool.
If you just came to shoot arrows, please think again.
 
You know how Jesus says to Peter ā€œupon this rock I will build my church and the gates of hell will not prevail against itā€?
Would this stuff fall into that category or not, meaning, are these changes signaling the devil’s influence in the CC?
The devil is constantly attacking the church, and no, he will never prevail. But he will always try to bring as much of the church down as possible. I believe the negative changes in the church have always been prompted by the devil. I also believe that God always prevails and will always turn bad into good, in his own way and in His own time.
 
The devil is constantly attacking the church, and no, he will never prevail. But he will always try to bring as much of the church down as possible. I believe the negative changes in the church have always been prompted by the devil. I also believe that God always prevails and will always turn bad into good, in his own way and in His own time.
How is God prevailing when the Mass used to be of great reverence and now it’s become an entertainment?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top