A
Andreas_Hofer
Guest
Well, take it up with the pope…I would disagree. Catholicism is the most “aesthetic” of the religions and has a distinct respect for how art and music moves people emotionally to deeper faith and prayer.
I’m not saying, though (nor is His Holiness) that liturgical music should not be “moving;” of course it should move the individual to greater depths of prayer. The critique is just that when that motion is primarily one of the passions, the depth isn’t being reached. Cdl. Ratzinger called the ideal a sort of “sober inebriation.” The inebriation comes from the movement toward and union with God, but the sober element comes from the fact that good sacred music leads us to contemplate God, not feel something about God.
This is sort of a side-issue to the thread, so I won’t dwell on it, but the sad fact is that most of us, myself included, simply don’t know what the ideal in Catholic music is; we wouldn’t be able to tell you what we should be singing. All we know is what we have been singing, and this leads to great confusion because lots of that stuff is what, in the opinion of the pope, many great liturgists, and sometimes even our liturgical law, never had a place in our worship to begin with.