Back in the late 200ās to early 300ās AD (I cannot stand the CE, BCE stuff) the main religion of Rome and the Empire was Mithraism. (fairly accurate, specifically within the legions) and Constantine himself was an inductee into the seven mysteries (Mithraism)
Iāve got a response for you to use. It dates back to the 160ās A.D., Justin Martyrās Second Apology, chapter 66:
For the apostles, in the memoirs composed by them, which are called Gospels, have thus delivered unto us what was enjoined upon them; that Jesus took bread, and when He had given thanks, said, āThis do ye in remembrance of Me, this is My body;ā and that, after the same manner, having taken the cup and given thanks, He said, āThis is My blood;ā and gave it to them alone. Which the wicked devils have imitated in the mysteries of Mithras, commanding the same thing to be done. For, that bread and a cup of water are placed with certain incantations in the mystic rites of one who is being initiated, you either know or can learn.
The cult of Mithras borrowed a lot from Christianity (as have wiccans, neo-pagans and satanists). But they certainly did not āinventā such things as:
The idea of one main earthly leader who in Mithraism is called āpapaā or Pope.
Theyāre getting this from the title āPontifex Maximusā - literally āSupreme Bridge-Builderā, which is one of the Popeās titles. This was used as the title for the head of the state religion in Roman antiquity - regardless of whether that religion was mystery cult, the personal cult of emperor deification, the pantheon stolen from the Greeks, Mithras or Sol Invictus. When Christianity was made the state religion (a notion so alien to American ears that itās immediately condemned by many) the title passed to the Bishop as well.
Even if the title didnāt remain, the idea of monarchic rule, rather than democratic, is morally repugnant to many Protestants. Why? Their faiths emerged during a time when democracy was on the rise or even flourishing. So why should we be surprised that the Catholic faith - which developed during a time of kings and emperors - has a monarch?
The seven mysteries became seven sacraments
Mithraism does not have a monopoly on the number seven. It is important to Christianity because it was important to the Jews, who saw it as the number of perfection and of Divinity.
Baptism was made to reflect the pouring/dunking done in Mithra worship where a bull was sacrificed over a pit and the new converts were then covered in the blood of the white bull (now the spotless lamb)
According to wiki (sorry) the initation was done by handshake following survival in an āordeal pitā, which was used to expose initiates to heat, cold or danger. Not bull blood.
The language of the āspot-free lambā (1 Pt 1:19) makes sense when you consider the Jewish culture in which Jesus was raised - such an animal was a fitting sacrifice for sin offering (Lv 4:32, 14:10, Nu 28:3, 28:9, etc.).
Albigensis was not really a Manichaen sect but was rather a group of Mithra worshippers and the Church sanctioned the murder of all, including women and children.
You lost me there, ghostrider. Do you mean the Albigensians are supposed to be ātrueā Christians opposed to the alleged vield Mithraism of the Church? Iāve heard similar things. Problem with Albigensians, Waldensians, and others, is if you look at the beliefs, they really donāt resemble that of modern Protestants aside from a non-ordained clergy and the push for access to Scripture for all. The Waldensians, for example, required vows of poverty, which few Protestant denominations adhere to today.
Iām really surprised that Dan Brown has not written a novel about Mithra.
Oh he will, he will.