R
rev_kevin
Guest
You want me to expose you? Okay - here goes:
Well – the fact that you copied and pasted from the book, “A Theology of the New Testament” by George Eldon Ladd is very telling in that, you only researched one source.
**Ladd was a Baptist minister with a very slanted **non-Catholic (which usually means non-historical) view.
Your deeply flawed opinion comes in when you make the following statement:
“When Peter confessed faith in Jesus’ messiahship and was designated the rock on which the church was to be founded, it was not as a private individual but as a spokesman and representative of the 12 in his apostolic capacity.”
This is, to put it mildly – hogwash, just as Ladd’s view that there was “no one leader”.
The Early church Fathers squash Ladd’s opinions AND yours:
Letter of Clement to James
Be it known to you, my lord, that Simon [Peter], who, for the sake of the true faith, and the most sure foundation of his doctrine, was set apart to be the foundation of the Church, and for this end was by Jesus himself, with his truthful mouth, named Peter, the first-fruits of our Lord, the first of the apostles; to whom first the Father revealed the Son; whom the Christ, with good reason, blessed; the called, and elect (Letter of Clement to James 2 A.D, 221]).
Cyprian
With a false bishop appointed for themselves by heretics, they dare even to set sail and carry letters from schismatics and blasphemers to the Chair of Peter** and to the principal church [at Rome], in which sacerdotal unity has its source" (Epistle to Cornelius [Bishop of Rome] 59:14 A.D. 252]).
The Lord says to Peter: “I say to you,” he says, “that you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my Church” . . . On him he builds the Church, and to him he gives the command to feed the sheep John 21:17], and although he assigns a like power to all the apostles, yet he founded a single chair [cathedra], and he established by his own authority a source and an intrinsic reason for that unity. Indeed, the others were that also which Peter was , but a primacy is given to Peter, whereby it is made clear that there is but one Church and one chair. So too, all [the apostles] are shepherds, and the flock is shown to be one, fed by all the apostles in single-minded accord.* If someone does not hold fast to this unity of Peter, can he imagine that he still holds the faith?* If he [should] desert the chair of Peter upon whom the Church was built, can he still be confident that he is in the Church? (The Unity of the Catholic Church 4 A.D. 251]).
Cyril of Jerusalem
In the power of the same Holy Spirit, Peter, both the chief of the apostles and the keeper of the keys of the kingdom of heaven, in the name of Christ healed Aeneas the paralytic at Lydda, which is now called Diospolis [Acts 9 ;3 2-3 4] (Catechetical Lectures 17;27 A.D. 350]).
You did it you exposed me, the Baptist with a Baptist point of view, how dare I. You are correct I used only one copy, like no one eles has here and I did not paste and copy, So how many do you want me to use I have more I just chose that one, big deal. See sunshine when you quote Scripture from the Bible you are doing the same thing, Paste and copy, thats like the pot calling the kettle black. Lets see here sunshine in your post you have quoted from other sources but I quess it all right for you but not others. Opps did I expose you sunshine? I know you will say no but I reall don’t care. Can you imagine a Baptist minister with a non-Catholic view, that seems pretty strange don’t it sunshine. What do you think that a Baptist minister will have a Catholic view. Does a priest have a Baptist view? I think not. See sunshine, it seems that if somebody disagrees with you then they are anti-Cathollic. Well sunshine I have some news for you, not everyone agrees with you, its true they don’t. Now I know that it may be a shocker to you but I think you will get over it some day, well mabe you won’t. Are you anti-Protestant? If so why? We are all children of God. Hay you didn’t point out the right thing I said, Why?