M
MyRdmrLvs
Guest
let me give you an example that makes my point: lets say you find yourself with 100 other people locked in a room with a very large bomb! the timer on the bomb is ticking and some people are saying we should cut the blue wire! others are saying cut the red! others say dump water over it! everyone is fairly certain there idea could work but know one knows for sure, except one guy. you see this guy is a bomb disposal expert, he has been diffusing bombs for years and could do it in his sleep. you could say he is INFALLIBLE. Now a decision has to be made on what to do. How is that decision made??? they all vote! thats right everyone has an equal say in determining their fate. Does this seem logical to you? Im thinking if everyone believes that guy is infallible, we arent voting on anything! He is going to tell us exactly what to do and thats the end of it.**Those early councils - as many of them do - were convened to combat **heresies, such as the Arian Heresy in the 4th century. Virtually every heresy begins with the misconception of the nature of the nature of God.
Just as with the Council of Jerusalem in Acts 15. It says that there was much debate before Peter, who was the leader, stood up and declared their beliefs - that were are saved solely by the grace of God and that gentile Christians should not be held to Jewish Law customs. Afterward, James, the Bishop of Jerusalem stood up and agreed.
The Pope is not a tyrant nor is he a king. He is here to serve the Church. One of his official titles is the “Servant of the Servants of God”.
the vote about the deity of Christ really demonstrates what these bishops believed. there is no way the would have voted if they believed the bishop of Rome was infallible. Does that mean hes not a wonderful God loving Jesus serving pontiff? NO it just means the infallible doctrine was cooked up later.