"WHERE'S THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE? The Case that Barack Obama is not Eligible to be President."

  • Thread starter Thread starter a_priori
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Then why won’t he show the long form, and why has he spent $2 million to avoid showing it? Just sayin…
The $2 million dollar figure is a number WND pulled out of the air based on nothing.

So why has no one posted any evidence he was born outside the US?
 
FYI, Agnes, I’ve stood vigil in front of abortuaries. I’ve done marches. I’ve lobbied legislators.

For pro-life work.
As do I 🙂
I’ve not even ever sent a stinkin e-mail about the BC.
Same here.
But I still say, if he’s got nothing to hide, he should just release the original BC and be done with it. Shut these people up.
Actually, it makes me wonder what’s on the BC that causes him not to release it. I didn’t used to wonder. But the more time goes by and the more money he spends on legal fees to keep it private, the more I wonder…
For a “transparency” Preacher…

I wonder if an actuary could do the math on this subject?

There seems to be toooooo many occurrences of omissions / hiding of documents etc for a Free Nation to have to endure.
 
The $2 million dollar figure is a number WND pulled out of the air based on nothing.

So why has no one posted any evidence he was born outside the US?
Because, the burden is with those who claim he was - including Mr. Obama.

Mr McCain had to endure this burden before Congress - Why not Mr. Obama?
 
All he has to do is turn it over.

The arrogance … its a honor to be the President of the United States.
It isnt too much to ask to turn over the birth certificate.

The longer it goes on… I wonder what he is hiding too.
 
Because, the burden is with those who claim he was - including Mr. Obama.

Mr McCain had to endure this burden before Congress - Why not Mr. Obama?
As I pointed out, there is considerable evidence that he was born in Hawaii. You have questioned the strength of that evidence, but it has been enough to convince such crazy leftists as John McCain, Karl Rove, Tim Pawlenty, Michelle Bachman, etc, etc, so it is clearly at least some evidence of where he was born. So what is the evidence to the contrary? So far no one has put forth a single thing.
 
As I pointed out, there is considerable evidence that he was born in Hawaii. You have questioned the strength of that evidence, but it has been enough to convince such crazy leftists as John McCain, Karl Rove, Tim Pawlenty, Michelle Bachman, etc, etc, so it is clearly at least some evidence of where he was born. So what is the evidence to the contrary? So far no one has put forth a single thing.
By the very same token - neither has Mr. Obama --now has he?

Is it true : That a birth could be registered BY MAIL in Hawaii in 1961?
 
All he has to do is turn it over.

The arrogance … its a honor to be the President of the United States.
It isnt too much to ask to turn over the birth certificate.

The longer it goes on… I wonder what he is hiding too.
I know of no other President - who has gone to such lengths to hide his documentation.

INCLUDING:
Besides Obama’s actual birth documentation, the still-concealed documentation for him includes kindergarten records, Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, passport, medical records, his files from his years as an Illinois state senator, his Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records, and his adoption records, Mother’s passport.
 
By the very same token - neither has Mr. Obama --now has he?

Is it true : That a birth could be registered BY MAIL in Hawaii in 1961?
You’re kidding right? You are saying that the Certificate of Birth, the official document that the state uses to prove birth, is no evidence at all? Zero?

And that the confirmation by the Republican Governor of Hawaii that the vaunted “long form” that the state keeps on file shows he was born in Hawaii is no evidence at all? Zero?

And the fact that his mother lived in Hawaii at the time he was born is no evidence at all?

And the fact that two newspapers reported his birth, and that both say they only report births based on official releases from the hospital or the state, that is also no evidence at all?

There is evidence of his birth in Hawaii, and I don’t see how anyone can seriously say otherwise. The only question is whether there it is outweighed by other evidence. I have asked if there is any evidence whatsoever that he was not born in Hawaii, and have heard nothing so far.
 
I know of no other President - who has gone to such lengths to hide his documentation.

INCLUDING:
Besides Obama’s actual birth documentation, the still-concealed documentation for him includes kindergarten records, Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, passport, medical records, his files from his years as an Illinois state senator, his Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records, and his adoption records, Mother’s passport.
Its weird.

All he has to do is turn it over and it all goes away.
 
Its weird.

All he has to do is turn it over and it all goes away.
Do you really believe that? That’s what everyone said about the Certificate of Birth, and releasing that only ignited more talk. He does not have the so-called “long-form”, the state of Hawaii does (and has confirmed it says he was born in Hawaii). If he were to somehow convince or force Hawaii to release the long form, there would just be something else. A movement that believes it requires no evidence for its side, and also that it is free to simply disregard any evidence on the other side, is not a rational movement that can be convinced with documents.

One more time, does anyone that doubts Obama was born in Hawaii have any evidence he was born elsewhere? Anything at all?
 
That’s exactly what they’re saying. For the birther arguments to hold up, this has to be a HUGE conspiracy. The Hawaii vital records dept.; the newspapers that published the birth announcements; the hospital that sent the birth information to the vital records dept. which resulted in the birth announcements; at least 2 Hawaii governors (one of them a Republican); every school he ever went to; the guy who claimed to be his roommate at Columbia; the Illinois bar; the State Department; Congress; even Michelle Bachmann and the other Republicans/Tea Partiers who’ve said the birth certificate is a birth certificate – they’re all in on the conspiracy.

What no one has explained is: Why?
Soros paid for a new wing at the hospital in return for a fake birth report to the state? There would be financial records.
Columbia knew he would be President someday and wanted to get on his good side? Show me how they knew.
Michelle Bachmann and Karl Rove have been paid off? By whom and for how much?

Seriously, folks, why are so many people and institutions, that normally wouldn’t have anything to do with each other, conspiring together on this?
You’re kidding right? You are saying that the Certificate of Birth, the official document that the state uses to prove birth, is no evidence at all? Zero?

And that the confirmation by the Republican Governor of Hawaii that the vaunted “long form” that the state keeps on file shows he was born in Hawaii is no evidence at all? Zero?

And the fact that his mother lived in Hawaii at the time he was born is no evidence at all?

And the fact that two newspapers reported his birth, and that both say they only report births based on official releases from the hospital or the state, that is also no evidence at all?

There is evidence of his birth in Hawaii, and I don’t see how anyone can seriously say otherwise. The only question is whether there it is outweighed by other evidence. I have asked if there is any evidence whatsoever that he was not born in Hawaii, and have heard nothing so far.
 
So why not, if they’re not part of the “conspiracy”?
I have no evidence if a conspiracy…that is why I stated it this way.
I don’t know if a “conspiracy” BUT it is a fact that Mr McCain was investigated by Congress - Mr Obama not.
This is a fact.

Because I have reasonable questions - that go unanswered - does not make me a conspiracy theorist. 🙂
 
It seems that there are a whole boat-load of reasons why Obama should not be the President. He has served as President for 2+ years; we’re not hurting for complaints.

This birth certificate nonsense, however, is not one of them. Conservatives seem to have a really difficult time getting people to keep their head in the game.

Pax,
OA
That’s exactly what they’re saying. For the birther arguments to hold up, this has to be a HUGE conspiracy. The Hawaii vital records dept.; the newspapers that published the birth announcements; the hospital that sent the birth information to the vital records dept. which resulted in the birth announcements; at least 2 Hawaii governors (one of them a Republican); every school he ever went to; the guy who claimed to be his roommate at Columbia; the Illinois bar; the State Department; Congress; even Michelle Bachmann and the other Republicans/Tea Partiers who’ve said the birth certificate is a birth certificate – they’re all in on the conspiracy.

What no one has explained is: Why?
Soros paid for a new wing at the hospital in return for a fake birth report to the state? There would be financial records.
Columbia knew he would be President someday and wanted to get on his good side? Show me how they knew.
Michelle Bachmann and Karl Rove have been paid off? By whom and for how much?

Seriously, folks, why are so many people and institutions, that normally wouldn’t have anything to do with each other, conspiring together on this?
 
You’re kidding right? You are saying that the Certificate of Birth, the official document that the state uses to prove birth, is no evidence at all? Zero?

And that the confirmation by the Republican Governor of Hawaii that the vaunted “long form” that the state keeps on file shows he was born in Hawaii is no evidence at all? Zero?
I can see you don’t read my posts entirely
**When Evans spoke to Abercrombie on January 19, Abercrombie reportedly told him that he searched the relevant Hawaii hospitals using his powers as governor, and concluded, according to Evans, “There is no Barack Obama birth certificate in Hawaii, absolutely no proof at all that Obama was born in Hawaii.” After Abercrombie made such a fuss about finding the birth certificate, Evans concluded of his friend that he has “got some egg in the face.”
Curiously too, when Evans asked Abercrombie when he first encountered the young Barack Obama, Abercrombie reportedly said, “I remember him playing in a T-Ball league,” when he was roughly five or six years old.**
Asking for the third time:

Is it true : That a birth could be registered BY MAIL in Hawaii in 1961?
 
One more time, does anyone that doubts Obama was born in Hawaii have any evidence he was born elsewhere? Anything at all?
Do you - or the Governor of Hawaii, have the long form?

I wonder why Mr Obama sealed his Kindergarten records - Ya think he’d be embarrassed that he colored outside the lines?
 
Seriously, folks, why are so many people and institutions, that normally wouldn’t have anything to do with each other, conspiring together on this?
Surely, you aren’t calling me a conspiracy theorist 🙂

Actually, to apply your innuendo requires you to be the conspiracy theorist 🤷
 
It seems that there are a whole boat-load of reasons why Obama should not be the President. He has served as President for 2+ years; we’re not hurting for complaints.

This birth certificate nonsense, however, is not one of them. Conservatives seem to have a really difficult time getting people to keep their head in the game.

Pax,
OA
It is not the birth certificate as much as it is the “Transparency Platform” He ran on - yet won’t apply it to himself.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top