As I have stated, I am not American but I know your history and I know the evil of political correctness.
Brunei in the early afternoon, tomorrow Malaysia, later in the week Nepal and then onto Bangladesh.
I don’t think it is a co-incidence that the people wishing to see racism everywhere are people supporting the historically racist Democratic Party. It seems psychologically they need to point the fingers somewhere else.
As Trump argues for reduced immigration and expresses a preference for people from countries populated almost exclusively by whites over countries populated almost exclusively by non-whites, we have a parallel.
The so-called parallel that you gave received all of the comment that it deserved. There is no parallel racial bias in component to immigration laws in place or proposed by Trump’s opponents. Nor is there any law excluding access to higher education on the basis of race in this country.
www.bitchute.com
Reduced immigration was not the Malaysian example. You are trying to force it and yet again, and still refusing to address the parallel that was presented.
Yes, it is the Republican party. There is no policy for open borders in policy of the Democratic party, but Trump speaks as thought there were to anti-immigrants in his base.
The Pew survey that I recently linked indicates that 61% of Republicans want immigration at current or higehr rates. Numbers are higher among independents and Democrats. Overall, there is little support for the position you describe.
Democrats have talked open borders. Sanctuary cities, defying federal law is encouraging open borders as is refusal to deal with border security and granting of ID’s without citizen checks.
So what?
Been down this road before. Some have talked aspirationally, not policy, of something akin to the Eurozone in the the Americas. So there has been “talk”, but then again Trump “talks” of open orders. Other posters have pointed out that the term “open borders” in some writings means things other than “open borders”.
So you say.
That survey attaches a quantitative indication of “a lot of people” as used in your post. A decided minority of Americans.
Again. So what.
They do.
Your arguing is non-sense here.
Study how we managed it in the past, we intentionally ensured a wide dispersion of immigrants, which worked well in terms of racial and ethnic diversity. From the historical perspective. there is a reasonable concern that we have lost this balance.
Numerous members have made racist statements. It belongs on the list because it is an inherently racist organization, just like the KKK.
So you are allowed to read what someone says and come to a conclusion but when someone like @Ridgerunner says does the same you say things like “You first ought to speak truthfully about what people said.” or “It is always better to hear people in their own words rather than the words that others stuff into their mouths.”
You forgot white victomolgy and Christian victomolgy (think war on Christmas). Oh, and my personal favorite, male victomolgy (aren’t men supposed to be strong and not whine about being picked on?)