B
Balto1
Guest
Could just list U.S. presidents and add a respectable 8 figures to capitalism’s death toll.
Don’t fool yourself. It was about the expansion of slavery and if it could be restricted to the states where slavery was legal and not expand into the territories. Folks in the slave states now try to blame states’ rights or self-determination, in order to feel better, I guess.It wasn’t always about slavery.
How simplistic and erroneous! How is it that the Twelve Apostles lived in what has been described as a socialist cell?Socialism is government forcing you to not do as you choose, and kill or imprison you if you resist.
Im none of these. So of course. Why would anyone think all jobs exist for everyone?Have you considered that not everyone can be a doctor, not ever everyone can be a stockbroker, not everyone can be a fireman.
Actually it’s self improving. Or, one can choose a more modest road. Teacher. Plumber.The fact that capitalism always relies on the improvement path of skills, training & education seems to be self defeating.
I think the history of upward mobility in America supports the idea that individuals have the opportunity to improve their lives in ways not available in a socialist system. And more than ever before, people of all backgrounds have this opportunity.Reality is training & re-skilling may be the only positive thing we can do, however it is still not a guarantee to improved income. Yes it increases the possibility of financial growth but is certainly not the outcome of all who take on this concept.
And none of these are socialism.Labor unions, social security, public housing, free healthcare, free food & among many other things we seem to take forgranted.
Did the government of their time strictly control or own the means of production?How simplistic and erroneous! How is it that the Twelve Apostles lived in what has been described as a socialist cell?
Then why did you bring it up?But let’s not veer off on that tangent. The subject has been worked over repeatedly on this forum.
I have to strongly disagree. Trade generally takes place between people of divergent skills, and has been that way since the first skilled arrow-maker who couldn’t hunt well traded some arrowheads for a haunch of venison from a hunter who couldn’t make arrowheads well.A person without particular skill doesn’t really have a choice other than to accept what is on offer, the take it or leave it approach.
And the left has always insisted on federal interference in public education. They’ve been successful in handing that power to the general government’s executive branch. It makes sense that when Republicans have power they use it for the good of education.This is hilarious. Republicans have always been vehemently against federal oversight of education.
Because it is not a power granted to the federal government in the Constitution.Republicans have always been vehemently against federal oversight of education.
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)They look real chummy there.
Double standard much?Whataboutism at large.
If people are going to imply that Trump, long before he was president, participated in child sexual abuse with Epstein (a despicable accusation without evidence) because of a picture they had taken together, it seems reasonable to consider Clinton’s picture with Epstein after he was president.This thread is about Trump. Yes or Yes?
Clinton is not the President. Yes or Yes?
Nonsense. …Could just list U.S. presidents and add a respectable 8 figures to capitalism’s death toll.