W
WingedHussar
Guest
Excellent, control the culture and you control the politics. Between this, immigration control, and now a 6-3 SCOTUS, the American right has the potential to dominate the politics for a couple of generations.
So, you don’t think the Nazi’s were guilty of any of the misery of WWII? That guilt is “misplaced?”Seeing as their model led to them importing thousands of foreigners out of some misplaced suicidal sense of guilty, I am thankful for that.
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)That is not what I said, now stop supporting a party that enables pedophilia.
This is a disgusting remark.So, you don’t think the Nazi’s were guilty of any of the misery of WWII? That guilt is “misplaced”?
Original has been edited appropriatelyThis is a disgusting remark.
I’ve edited my post to reflect the change.
Australia may well be 90% or more white. Thus, asking how blacks are treated in Australia I’d say is a total non-starter and irrelevant. I also have no idea what the history of slavery is in Australia or if they even had them.Australia of course
Its bonza mate
These terms are not interchangeable. You are correct to say we do not have structural racism any longer. Structural implies written into law or otherwise explicitly stated. But the term “systemic racism” is a little trickier. It refers to any aspect of the system, including those things that are implemented as a matter of free choice by those in power when the law allows such a free choice. One example could be a difference in how discretionary sentences are applied to backs vs. whites. There is no explicit structural reason why there should be any difference. But if, as a matter of fact, those in power whose prerogative is to make such discretionary decisions just happen to make them in a biased manner, the result can properly be called systemic racism, even though it is not structural. The term “institutional racism” is generally used as a synonym for “systemic racism” and is also expressed as non-codified biases that are, as a matter of empirical fact, race-related as revealed by the statistics.Systemic or institutional racism is a misnomer in my opinion. We certainly do not have a structural apartheid system any longer.
Okay. I am.I’m not sure that any of these things are outright lies. I truly believe there is a lot of nuance to America.
No one said they were angels, but they did found a system that we as a country have gotten better and better at living up to.We were not founded by angels or saints. We were founded by white, mostly wealthy, mostly slave-owning protestant men. Many of these men were virulently anti-catholic elites bent on forming a new power structure in their image.
I agree, for the most part. In the last sentence, how?Systemic or institutional racism is a misnomer in my opinion. We certainly do not have a structural apartheid system any longer. However, we are only 5 decades removed from deep systemic and institutional racism in the south. Elements of that system still impact American society today.
Australia is quite a melting pot, it is predicted by mid century we will all reflect the immigration stats by being anything but Anglo Saxon in outward appearance. Even now, take a walk down the main street of any capital city to determine where our roots are. We did have a whites policy that was abandoned mid last century.Australia may well be 90% or more white. Thus, asking how blacks are treated in Australia I’d say is a total non-starter and irrelevant. I also have no idea what the history of slavery is in Australia or if they even had them.
European powers and Africans themselves, brought this here, it was the way of the world.
Bonza Mate