R
Rence
Guest
I completely understand that’s what you say about it. But sorry, the Bishops’ guide didn’t say that at all.A list of topics to consider only after it was determined the candidate was pro-life.
I completely understand that’s what you say about it. But sorry, the Bishops’ guide didn’t say that at all.A list of topics to consider only after it was determined the candidate was pro-life.
Or in this case, despite that they want the economy to improve.would vote for Obama … all because they want … the economy to improve etc.
Yea, Obama should’ve known better than to start two wars at once!!!Or in this case, despite that they want the economy to improve.
Considering how much he railed against the two that were ongoing, you would think he would have ended at least one of them, not go start a THIRD one.Yea, Obama should’ve known better than to start two wars at once!!!
![]()
Obama started two wars? You mean the U.S. is now fighting four wars? Well, maybe Iraq, started under Bush, but Obama is quickly bringing that one to a close. Afghanistan, also started under Bush. Again, Obama has moved to bring that one closer to an end. Maybe Libya, though the U.S. isn’t so much at war with Libya as much as it is aiding the efforts of NATO in attempting to force “the mad dog of the Middle East” (Reagan’s description of Khaddafi) to step down as tyrant of the country. I’m unclear about where the fourth war might be, unless you are referring to the “war on terror,” but again, that began long before Obama was President and then he has made significant steps in prosecuting that war by making sure that Bin Laden was removed. Are these the wars you’re talking about?Yea, Obama should’ve known better than to start two wars at once!!!
![]()
I was trying to make the point that the economy was inherited and cannot be totally this administration’s fault. We were already spiraling before he went into office. Of course partisans will spin it to be the others fault even though they ALL are at fault.Considering how much he railed against the two that were ongoing, you would think he would have ended at least one of them, not go start a THIRD one.![]()
There is no difference between Fred Flintstone and Ron Paul. They’re both from the stoneage.I will vote for…
Homer Simpson
as a write in canidate.
Hummm
well… either Homer Simpson or Fred Flintstone.
The economy was built on an ecomonic faultline that was put in place back in the 1940s by a guy name John Maynard Keynes at the Bretton Woods Conference. All Presidents since FDR have “inherited” the mess and piled onto it. It is just coming to a tipping point with Obama, who hasn’t helped by pouring gas onto the already raging fire. So no, its not Obama, its not Bush. Its Obama, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Reagan, Carter, Ford, Nixon, Johnson, Kennedy, Eisenhower, Truman, Roosevelt.I was trying to make the point that the economy was inherited and cannot be totally this administration’s fault. We were already spiraling before he went into office. Of course partisans will spin it to be the others fault even though they ALL are at fault.
Sorry if you missed my sarcasm. I completely forgot about Libya and was thinking of Iraq and Afghanistan…Just finished 24 hour shift at 8 this morning and haven’t gone to sleep yet. Time to crash and burn.Obama started two wars? You mean the U.S. is now fighting four wars? Well, maybe Iraq, started under Bush, but Obama is quickly bringing that one to a close. Afghanistan, also started under Bush. Again, Obama has moved to bring that one closer to an end. Maybe Libya, though the U.S. isn’t so much at war with Libya as much as it is aiding the efforts of NATO in attempting to force “the mad dog of the Middle East” (Reagan’s description of Khaddafi) to step down as tyrant of the country. I’m unclear about where the fourth war might be, unless you are referring to the “war on terror,” but again, that began long before Obama was President and then he has made significant steps in prosecuting that war by making sure that Bin Laden was removed. Are these the wars you’re talking about?
I think that was my point, We can’t trust any of them. There is only one worthy of our trust and He seems to be forgotten in many of these discussions.The economy was built on an ecomonic faultline that was put in place back in the 1940s by a guy name John Maynard Keynes at the Bretton Woods Conference. All Presidents since FDR have “inherited” the mess and piled onto it. It is just coming to a tipping point with Obama, who hasn’t helped by pouring gas onto the already raging fire. So no, its not Obama, its not Bush. Its Obama, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Reagan, Carter, Ford, Nixon, Johnson, Kennedy, Eisenhower, Truman, Roosevelt.
He is the only one I really trust. Most of these others are publicity hounds.I think that was my point, We can’t trust any of them. There is only one worthy of our trust and He seems to be forgotten in many of these discussions.![]()
Maybe the fourth one is the recent action in Yemen.Obama started two wars? You mean the U.S. is now fighting four wars? Well, maybe Iraq, started under Bush, but Obama is quickly bringing that one to a close. Afghanistan, also started under Bush. Again, Obama has moved to bring that one closer to an end. Maybe Libya, though the U.S. isn’t so much at war with Libya as much as it is aiding the efforts of NATO in attempting to force “the mad dog of the Middle East” (Reagan’s description of Khaddafi) to step down as tyrant of the country. I’m unclear about where the fourth war might be, unless you are referring to the “war on terror,” but again, that began long before Obama was President and then he has made significant steps in prosecuting that war by making sure that Bin Laden was removed. Are these the wars you’re talking about?
Against covert wars? Not at all. I’m sure they’re the ones behind the growing war in the Republican Party. They’ve probably even donated to Ms. Palin’s road trip.Maybe the fourth one is the recent action in Yemen.
nytimes.com/2011/06/09/world/middleeast/09intel.html?_r=1&hp
“The Obama administration has intensified the American covert war in Yemen, exploiting a growing power vacuum in the country to strike at militant suspects with armed drones and fighter jets, according to American officials.”
So I guess if you count Libya, Iraq, and Afghanistan, you get four wars. I thought the Democrat left was against covert wars. I guess it depends on who is president.
Ishii
I don’t know of any “growing war” in the Republican party. I do know that there is a field of candidates all vying for the nomination. The only Republican who has spoken ill of another Republican is Newt Gingrich and he got pilloried for it.Against covert wars? Not at all. I’m sure they’re the ones behind the growing war in the Republican Party. They’ve probably even donated to Ms. Palin’s road trip.
I would totally vote for Uncle Ted, the Motor City Madman, Nuge.Ted Nugent for president 2012!
Democratics are against any war they don’t start.Maybe the fourth one is the recent action in Yemen.
nytimes.com/2011/06/09/world/middleeast/09intel.html?_r=1&hp
“The Obama administration has intensified the American covert war in Yemen, exploiting a growing power vacuum in the country to strike at militant suspects with armed drones and fighter jets, according to American officials.”
So I guess if you count Libya, Iraq, and Afghanistan, you get four wars. I thought the Democrat left was against covert wars. I guess it depends on who is president.
Ishii